How will the media handle Bidens sexual assualt allegation? NYT tweet lets us know...just amazing

Biden got the Obama blessing for 2020. The democrats aren't going to let Obama's Vice President of 8 years be a sexual predator of women.

If it got really bad for him at very worst Biden may back out and Reade get paid off to be quiet. And they'll let Joe fade quietly to be forgotten.

I doubt this will ever get to an actual investigation either way. Bidens future relies on how much the democrats want to plug their ears and pretend not to hear.
 
So the Townhall was co-hosted by Hillary Clinton?

No mention of the allegations.

In the clips I've seen it's not clear that Joe even said much.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FLVOL_79
What??????????
You think CNN and CNBC are more left than Fox is right.
Good one.
CNN opinions are polar opposites of Fox’s and equally biased. The only difference I see is Fox at least has two liberal goofs that appear every now and then......Geraldo and Juan Williams. CNN is all goof ......all the time
 
How biased is your news source? You probably won’t agree with this chart
Notice the location of Fox compared to CNN and MSNBC
MW-GE557_MediaB_20180228115701_NS.jpg
this is utter ********
 
this is utter ********
It's always amusing to see you guys confronted with truth.
Google "media bias".
I now, I know.....you don't need some fancy high-falutin sciency studies telling you what to think.....that's what Fox is for; and they say CNN is the worstest.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mick
this is utter ********
I watched a hit piece on ABC, that pretty much said Covid is Trumps fault. Trump made mistakes, but the piece was so slanted to make things look much worse. It stretches the truth in several places. I spent the next 20 minutes researching some of the claims. It talks about how trump shutdown agencies, but never mentioned how those agencies were merged. It never presented how any single death would have been prevented or any policy changed. There is. I doubt, having watched, that this had nothing to die with Covid and everything to do with politics.

The new narrative is how Covid has killed more than Vietnam.

In 2018, the flu killed more people than vietnamCDC: 80,000 people died of flu last winter in the U.S. - STAT
And that was WITH a vaccine. Any quarantine? Stay at home? Shut down? Nope.

Fox doesn’t disguise anything. These other news agencies are far more dangerous.
 
Last edited:
It's always amusing to see you guys confronted with truth.
Google "media bias".
I now, I know.....you don't need some fancy high-falutin sciency studies telling you what to think.....that's what Fox is for; and they say CNN is the worstest.

CNN’s journalism was on full display during the Russian collusion hoax. I don’t remember them asking too many tough questions. They regularly relied on anonymous sources as if they were the truth. CNN ruined their credibility in an effort to take down the president.

Not really much journalism going on over there. It looks to me like news shaping to support an agenda.
 
It's always amusing to see you guys confronted with truth.
Google "media bias".
I now, I know.....you don't need some fancy high-falutin sciency studies telling you what to think.....that's what Fox is for; and they say CNN is the worstest.

You are like the guy that doesn’t fish , but read online how to do it , and is giving advice to the ones that do actually fish based off what you read in an outdated article . Do you watch Fox CNN or MSNBC on a regular bases ?
 
It's always amusing to see you guys confronted with truth.
Google "media bias".
I now, I know.....you don't need some fancy high-falutin sciency studies telling you what to think.....that's what Fox is for; and they say CNN is the worstest.


There are a couple things wrong with the chart. First of all, the analysis of the news sources would have to be proven to be without bias. After reading through her website and bio as well as the bios of her advisory board, it would be difficult to say that theirs was a completely unbiased analysis.
Second, one of her main measures was using already in place “fact checkers.” These fact checkers have the same propensity to bias as well.
Lastly, the bell shaped curve used in the chart assumes a normal distribution. A different observer may view the data set as a skewed distribution, possibly even a positive skewed distribution where the mode is much further left than the mean.
 
There are a couple things wrong with the chart. First of all, the analysis of the news sources would have to be proven to be without bias. After reading through her website and bio as well as the bios of her advisory board, it would be difficult to say that theirs was a completely unbiased analysis.
Second, one of her main measures was using already in place “fact checkers.” These fact checkers have the same propensity to bias as well.
Lastly, the bell shaped curve used in the chart assumes a normal distribution. A different observer may view the data set as a skewed distribution, possibly even a positive skewed distribution where the mode is much further left than the mean.
Doesn't matter, it's all a continuum, to luther, who's x/y axis is skewed.
 

VN Store



Back
Top