How will the media handle Bidens sexual assualt allegation? NYT tweet lets us know...just amazing

#677
#677
evillawyer said:
Good article examining the strengths and weaknesses of her allegations in USA Today.

SIAP: Why I'm skeptical about Reade's sexual assault claim against Biden: Ex-prosecutor
Click to expand...
The other thing about the allegation is that is there was an actual complaint failed in the Senate the GOP would have found it in there oppo research in 2008 or 2012. They didn’t. Reade reminds me more of the woman who says Peyton Manning assaulted her in the locker room and from time to time she calls the university demanding the truth be told.
 
#679
#679
SpaceCoastVol said:
Has nothing to do with belief. It is damage control. Seal any records you don't want people to see (Zero's college records for example) or say the case has no merit and close it without any real investigation. The left is a disgusting lot.
Click to expand...
Trump has more sealed documents and NDAs than any politician ever.
Trumpers are a unthinking lot.
 
#680
#680
RockyTop85 said:
A year ago, she said what happened wasn’t sexual, and said she left his office because of bullying by his staff, which she said wasn’t his fault but theirs. She lamented that he didn’t know why she left or what was happening to her.

It’s not a good case.
Click to expand...
She didn’t allege sexual assault until after last summer when Biden entered the race. And the allegation didn’t begin to drip out until after Super Tuesday when she started going to far left news outlets that just so happened to support Sanders.
 
#681
#681
Weezer said:
In the past, the left was far more vocal about believing women. Why? Probably because it was a conservative being accused. The reason I take issue with the left on this is the blatant double standard they've displayed. They were all about #metoo and "believe women" until it was a Dem being accused. And not just any Dem, but Biden, their Presidential hopeful. So that's why I'm calling them out. They've suddenly changed their stance because it's one of their own. Blatant hypocrisy. That's why I take issue with it.
Click to expand...
It all goes back to my football analogy.
If there is holding happening on every play, the coach whose team is on defense will be the one yelling at the refs.
 
#683
#683
luthervol said:
It all goes back to my football analogy.
If there is holding happening on every play, the coach whose team is on defense will be the one yelling at the refs.
Click to expand...
Comparing holding in football to sexual assault. Thought you were better than that. Sorry to be wrong.
 
#686
#686
carlos86 said:
She said if I’m correct it happens the summer of 1982. She didn’t give us a 5 year period.
Click to expand...
She originally told the WaPo that it happened mid-80's, then she told Diane Fienstein it was sometime in the early 80's, then magically settled on the summer of 1982...which Kavanaugh was able to produce calendars showing that summer he did not have any free weekends during her time frame. But she doesn't know the location, how she got there, or how she got home and doesn't have one single person to place her or Kavanaugh together.

I didn't realize this but her father supported Kavanaugh and didn't believer her claims.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BlackCreekVol, 37L1, SpaceCoastVol and 3 others
#687
#687
Weezer said:
Not even close. Reade has a lot more. Including a recording of her mother calling in to Larry King.
Click to expand...
You couldn’t convict a person in court with an Anonymous phone call from the 90s. And no one can verify if it is her mother because she’s dead.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Mick
#689
#689
hog88 said:
Summer of 82 is a ****ing far cry from having a date and place.
Click to expand...

Vague timelines are pretty common in false accusations when you don't want the person you are accusing to be able to pull up a calendar entry or a Senate floor taping and prove their innocence.

So in both cases, the lack of a specific time and place doesn't help the credibility of the accuser.
 
#690
#690
Weezer said:
Comparing holding in football to sexual assault. Thought you were better than that. Sorry to be wrong.
Click to expand...
Please.
For you to claim the left is treating the two differently while the right is treating them the same is preposterous.
You're supposed to be the one who firmly stands in the middle and views both sides objectively and without bias.
You're losing your footing.
 
#691
#691
Rifleman said:
Vague timelines are pretty common in false accusations when you don't want the person you are accusing to be able to pull up a calendar entry or a Senate floor taping and prove their innocence.

So in both cases, the lack of a specific time and place doesn't help the credibility of the accuser.
Click to expand...

I think both cases are BS and even if they weren't so much time has passed they are irrelevant and should be ignored.

The only interesting thing about these cases is the media and several of our posters hypocrisy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BlackCreekVol and SpaceCoastVol
#692
#692
SpaceCoastVol said:
But of course there were hearings for Kavanaugh. But I guess the potential democrat POTUS doesn't warrant that.
Click to expand...

Sorry that there is no advice and consent of the Senate requirement for Presidential candidates. But don't worry, I'm sure on day one Mitch and his goons would launch 7 investigations into Reades allegations
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top