How will the media handle Bidens sexual assualt allegation? NYT tweet lets us know...just amazing

You guys discount everything from almost every media source as fake news, but when its a sexual assault claim, it suddenly becomes gospel. Interesting. I would like to hear Biden's response, his staff at the time's response etc.

I think most everyone knows this hag is FOS but the dems and msm created the rules for this stuff....except when it happens to them.
 
I’ve done no such thing in this case so put down the big brush Picasso.

What I’ve screamed about is the obvious bias of the MSM in the (lack of) coverage of this.

Of course her claim is suspect after all this time. But this time why am I not seeing it on every news cast, every media page, every news paper ... 🤷‍♂️

It’s obvious and it stinks. Plain and simple.

I have seen many stories on it. On CNN, on Fox etc.
 
She made them to her superiors. Lo and behold they remember nothing and there is no paper trail.

Sorry about her bad luck then, maybe she should have went to the authorities. Or brought it to the press when he was a senator or when he was running for VP?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boca Vol
Lol. Ok yeah sure you’ve seen the same level of coverage and plastering and coddling of her.

You’re making **** up now.

Im waiting for the women’s protest groups , people banging on doors, waiting on teams of lawyers “ volunteer “ to represent her , and that all important #GoFundMe account .
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boca Vol and Bigun
I don’t believe anything until I hear from Danny Glover , Sean Penn and Robert Denerdo
Oh we have to hear the from the flock of clients that will make claims thru creepy porn lawyer too!

Oh we can’t... he’s in jail and at least one of them had criminal charges filed against them 😂
 
Nope. Two members I do know and respect agree with me. The 3rd I know personally disagrees.

I am not sure what I supposed to say to this... Of the 1.3M attorneys in the US, you know 2 that agree with you and one that disagrees. Attorneys are simply a cross section of America. You have liberal, conservative and the extremes of both. Some attorneys are small business owners, others work for large firms, some are employed by private companies in a variety of ways and still others work for the government. Your attempts to paint them into one group or another are not born out by the realities.
 
The Dems set the rules during the Kavanaugh hearing. Now we make them play by the rules they set.
And there is much more evidence against O'Biden than Judge K. Ford couldn't name a single detail about the incident nor could was there ever any evidence they had ever even met. It's proven this lady worked for O'Biden
 
I am not sure what I supposed to say to this... Of the 1.3M attorneys in the US, you know 2 that agree with you and one that disagrees. Attorneys are simply a cross section of America. You have liberal, conservative and the extremes of both. Some attorneys are small business owners, others work for large firms, some are employed by private companies in a variety of ways and still others work for the government. Your attempts to paint them into one group or another are not born out by the realities.
The only group I would paint them in is a group of people with no concept of right and wrong, only legal and illegal. The whole group is a bunch of liars and manipulators. They manipulate the truth, the jury, and the system. There is a reason that the Lost State of Franklin prohibited lawyers from holding political office over 200 years ago. You folks haven't changed.
 
The only group I would paint them in is a group of people with no concept of right and wrong, only legal and illegal. The whole group is a bunch of liars and manipulators. They manipulate the truth, the jury, and the system. There is a reason that the Lost State of Franklin prohibited lawyers from holding political office over 200 years ago. You folks haven't changed.

On the whole, nothing could be further from the truth. Very rarely in a dispute has one side committed no wrong and the other done completely wrong. Each side has their own perception of the truth. When I take a case, I am hired to present my client's version of the truth. I am also hired to give my client counsel on the holes in his version of the truth and how an unbiased third party might view his version of the truth. Sometimes that will lead a client to settle, which is my hope when the case is not strong. However, if the client wants to proceed to trial, my job is to present his version of the truth to jury while attempting to discredit the other party's version. The jury then decides who they believe. Just because I do not believe the client has a strong case does not mean the jury will see it the same way. I have been surprised many times both good and bad by juries. In short attorneys are not paid to present the absolute truth because we do not know it. We are paid to present a client's truth.

In my opinion, your beef whether you know it or not, is with society at large because the attorneys for the time they are retained are merely a mirror of their client.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Purple Tiger

VN Store



Back
Top