I don't think I would hate Kentucky...

#376
#376
Berry4Heisman14 said:
I'm not stupid enough to judge 2 players that haven't played a minute yet of college ball unlike you. I've said nothing about them 2, or Stokes being better. All I said was, is that it's rediculous for you to go ahead and say those 2 are better then Stokes when you haven't even seen them play in college yet. Reading comprehension is clearly a area of weakness for you :crazy:
Click to expand...

I read reports. Maybe you should, too?

Stokes was rated 20th in the country. Shabazz and Noel are rated 1 and 2, not by me, but by experts who travel to every high school game. So far, they've been amazingly accurate with ratings in the last few years. ALL say Noel and Shabazz are on a level of ther own. Both would go pro if not for the rule. If you want to say "we're not sure because we havent seen them play"...speak for yourself, both are on ESPN quite a bit.
 
#377
#377
Bleeding orange, where are you? I havent heard a response since you told me Stokes outplayed Jones...:lolabove:

Cue the Troll comments since I proved him wrong.
 
#378
#378
Judge_Smails said:
I read reports. Maybe you should, too?

Stokes was rated 20th in the country. Shabazz and Noel are rated 1 and 2, not by me, but by experts who travel to every high school game. So far, they've been amazingly accurate with ratings in the last few years. ALL say Noel and Shabazz are on a level of ther own. Both would go pro if not for the rule. If you want to say "we're not sure because we havent seen them play"...speak for yourself, both are on ESPN quite a bit.
Click to expand...

Once again, your comprehension sucks. I said we haven't seen them play yet in COLLEGE. I didn't say no nobody has seen them play yet. If they turn out better then Stokes and prove it next year when we play UK, sure, i'll admit they're better. But nobody has seen them play yet IN COLLEGE. So until we do, it's fair to not make a judgement on who's better. I haven't once said Stokes is better. We'll just have to wait and see.
 
#379
#379
Berry4Heisman14 said:
Once again, your comprehension sucks. I said we haven't seen them play yet in COLLEGE. I didn't say no nobody has seen them play yet. If they turn out better then Stokes and prove it next year when we play UK, sure, i'll admit they're better. But nobody has seen them play yet IN COLLEGE. So until we do, it's fair to not make a judgement on who's better. I haven't once said Stokes is better. We'll just have to wait and see.
Click to expand...

Have you ever seen Badder Santa? The part where Billy Bob says to the kid "Wish in one hand and chit in the other and tell me which one fills up first"...... this reminds me a little of that.

John Wall was rated high coming out of high school, everyone was talking about him like they are about Noel and Shabazz. I understand your theory, but the experts are been batting 1.000 when predicting a superstar.
 
#380
#380
Judge_Smails said:
Have you ever seen Badder Santa? The part where Billy Bob says to the kid "Wish in one hand and chit in the other and tell me which one fills up first"...... this reminds me a little of that.

John Wall was rated high coming out of high school, everyone was talking about him like they are about Noel and Shabazz. I understand your theory, but the experts are been batting 1.000 when predicting a superstar.
Click to expand...

Wasn't Harrison Barnes supposed to be one of the all time greatest college players ever.
 
#381
#381
Judge_Smails said:
Have you ever seen Badder Santa? The part where Billy Bob says to the kid "Wish in one hand and chit in the other and tell me which one fills up first"...... this reminds me a little of that.

John Wall was rated high coming out of high school, everyone was talking about him like they are about Noel and Shabazz. I understand your theory, but the experts are been batting 1.000 when predicting a superstar.
Click to expand...

I see your point too. Obviously basketball ranking has been a lot more accurate then football ranking when comparing busts, etc, but still, it's only fair to wait simply bc any player can turn out to be a bust. For all I know, these 2 could turn out to be better then anyone on UK or UT's roster right now. I know just as well as you do, and we'll find out. If i'm wrong, i'll admit I was wrong.
 
#382
#382
Judge_Smails said:
Yeah, Jones outscored him both times. Good try, though, keep grasping.
Click to expand...

Stokes played about 14 mins the first game I'd hope he did. Your too dumb to realize when stokes was on jones he owned him. Find the stats when they were matched up against each other I'll wait:

I'm waiting on my 4 other links still too
 
#383
#383
Judge_Smails said:
Being the water boy to the best 2 players in the country doesnt mean you suck. It means you arent as good as the 2 mentioned, and the 2 mentioned are insanely good.

Just like I used to tell my college girlfriends "read carefully and dont assume".
Click to expand...

College boyfriends is actually what you meant because there's no female that'd listen to your BS
 
#384
#384
Judge_Smails said:
This one still cracks me up. A double screw up. Jones outscored him in both matchups, even by shooting less.

Then you have to go out and tell me what position Gilchrist plays. You're getting less intelligent by the hour. UK has 2 positions, a 5 and everything else. And on defnse gilchrist has guarded every position, from center to point guard.

What else ya got Dickie V? :eek:lol:
Click to expand...

Saying you have 2 position may be your dumbest post. Why doesn't jones run your offense oh hes not the PG that's right.

Idiot.
 
#385
#385
Judge_Smails said:
I read reports. Maybe you should, too?

Stokes was rated 20th in the country. Shabazz and Noel are rated 1 and 2, not by me, but by experts who travel to every high school game. So far, they've been amazingly accurate with ratings in the last few years. ALL say Noel and Shabazz are on a level of ther own. Both would go pro if not for the rule. If you want to say "we're not sure because we havent seen them play"...speak for yourself, both are on ESPN quite a bit.
Click to expand...

And neither claim UK as their favorite. How funny!
 
#386
#386
And funny judge in the first game.
Jarnell played 7 less minutes yet had only 1 less point on 3 less shots, and only 1 less rebound. So in his time on the court which remember was his first college game he outplayed jones. You can't look at what jones did off the court idiot. Lmao and he fouled out guarding a HS SENIOR ROFL

IN the 2nd game yes jones outplayed him, it helped though that they could bear hug him and not be called for a foul.

But ok so the matchuos 1-1 clearly jones isn't head and shoulders better than him. There's a reason cal wanted him so bad idiot
 
#387
#387
Judge_Smails said:
Bleeding orange, where are you? I havent heard a response since you told me Stokes outplayed Jones...:lolabove:

Cue the Troll comments since I proved him wrong.
Click to expand...

Judge where are you? looking for all those links that you never have provided to back up your false claims...

oh wait thatd never happen because you know they only existed in yours and michael jacksons special place :crazy:
 
#389
#389
Judge_Smails said:
Have you ever seen Badder Santa? The part where Billy Bob says to the kid "Wish in one hand and chit in the other and tell me which one fills up first"...... this reminds me a little of that.

John Wall was rated high coming out of high school, everyone was talking about him like they are about Noel and Shabazz. I understand your theory, but the experts are been batting 1.000 when predicting a superstar.
Click to expand...

Let see #1 in recent years, who was superstar:
2011: anthony davis...yes
2010: harrison barnes..no
2009: derrick favors...no
2008: brandon jennings...no
2007: oj mayo..no
2006: greg oden...yes
2005: josh mcroberts...no
2004: shaun livingston..no
2003: lebron james...yes
2002: raymond felton...no


wow. 3/10 equals batting 1000? is that KY math?
 
#390
#390
BleedingTNorang,
So even though Stokes was outplayed and outscored in both meetings while taking more shots, Stokes is still better? Dont get so angry, just asking you a question. Your theories fascinate me. In 10 categories you'll find one that he wins and you'll ride it till the end. Kind of funny.
 
#392
#392
Judge_Smails said:
BleedingTNorang,
So even though Stokes was outplayed and outscored in both meetings while taking more shots, Stokes is still better? Dont get so angry, just asking you a question. Your theories fascinate me. In 10 categories you'll find one that he wins and you'll ride it till the end. Kind of funny.
Click to expand...

wow did you miss the point that badly?

pay attention here closely...in the first matchup STOKES PLAYED 7 LESS MINUTES. if you took each of their averages and made it an even 30 minutes for each stokes would have beaten him in every category. in 7 less minutes stokes had 1 less point, yet took 3 LESS SHOTS THAN JONES DID, had 1 less rebound in 7 LESS MINUTES, had the same assists in 7 LESS MINUTES...do you get the point? if stokes were to have played 7 MORE MINUTES he would have beaten jones in every category.

and the fact that jones got fouled out by a high school senior in 20 minutes should tell you how well jones did against him. :crazy:
 
#393
#393
bleedingTNorange said:
Let see #1 in recent years, who was superstar:
2011: anthony davis...yes
2010: harrison barnes..no
2009: derrick favors...no
2008: brandon jennings...no
2007: oj mayo..no
2006: greg oden...yes
2005: josh mcroberts...no
2004: shaun livingston..no
2003: lebron james...yes
2002: raymond felton...no


wow. 3/10 equals batting 1000? is that KY math?
Click to expand...

You're too dumb to discuss anything with. ESPN, CBS and Scout dont say that the #1 kid is going to be a superstar. Its only about once every few years they go this into detail.
 
#394
#394
Judge_Smails said:
You're too dumb to discuss anything with. ESPN, CBS and Scout dont say that the #1 kid is going to be a superstar. Its only about once every few years they go this into detail.
Click to expand...

your right. go read the scout on each of those guys, i guarantee you more than 3 say the word elite or superstar somewhere in their profile.
 
#395
#395
bleedingTNorange said:
weak? you do realize that 5 out of the top 10 in that class are currently on nba rosters right?

proving you wrong gets easier and easier
Click to expand...

Yes, that class is kind of weak. Who jumps ship to the NBA has nothing to do with the talent level, the NBA has a draft whether the college level is loaded with talent or not.

Why do I feel like I'm talking with a 5 yr old?
 
#396
#396
Judge_Smails said:
Yes, that class is kind of weak. Who jumps ship to the NBA has nothing to do with the talent level, the NBA has a draft whether the college level is loaded with talent or not.

Why do I feel like I'm talking with a 5 yr old?
Click to expand...

so going to the NBA doesnt require talent :eek:lol::eek:lol:

oh geez i dont know how long i can take this
 
#397
#397
Judge_Smails said:
Yes, that class is kind of weak. Who jumps ship to the NBA has nothing to do with the talent level, the NBA has a draft whether the college level is loaded with talent or not.

Why do I feel like I'm talking with a 5 yr old?
Click to expand...

the 09 class with almighty wall, also had 5 out of 10 go after 1 year. so the top 10 was pretty even as far as nba talent is considered, that is unless the nba no longer requires talent as you suggested.
 
#398
#398
I have to give you credit, for knowing nothing about college basketball you could argue why the rim is set at 10ft for hours. My all time favorite is when you said that Cal hiring AAU coaches for a recruit was absolutely terrible and considered dirty or cheating. I felt so sorry for you I actually brought it up easy, how those practices are done by everyone.

I'm off to bed Shirley, you have a good night, we'll pick up where we left off tomorrow. Me answering your dumb questions :)
 
#399
#399
Judge_Smails said:
I have to give you credit, for knowing nothing about college basketball you could argue why the rim is set at 10ft for hours. My all time favorite is when you said that Cal hiring AAU coaches for a recruit was absolutely terrible and considered dirty or cheating. I felt so sorry for you I actually brought it up easy, how those practices are done by everyone.

I'm off to bed Shirley, you have a good night, we'll pick up where we left off tomorrow. Me answering your dumb questions :)
Click to expand...

haha i find it funny that when called out on you making a dumb A statement like nba doesnt require talent you end the convo.

im done with you judge, you seriously are too stupid to even insult.
 
#400
#400
By the way....what happened to your old pic? The one with a UT player driving against a UK player? Your new one is funny, all of a sudden everyone is a Martin fan...but UK fans are the bandwagoners, right? Catch you tomorrow
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top