Copy and Paste a book. Let no one respond and post another link, talking to yourself. Seems like a theme for some people in the Politics.
Anyone can click the reply button and respond at any time, in the thread you mention, one poster did respond, thanking me for posting that information since he had lived through the horror and was able to escape to America where he finds 99.99% of the people to be totally ignorant of what actually went down and continues to be hell on Earth for some while being touted as progress by American media and our esteemed politicians.
BTW, I provided a link to the book and only actually posted about 30 to 40% of the whole text, which could be read in less than an hour, even for slow readers and the attention span challenged.
Nothing but a bunch of
Wow, gsvol took over!
What is the deal?
Somebody had to do it, to save the place from banal double plus good duckspeak.
Sweet. I'm considering the Alexei Lalas mega goatee.
How meritorious, is that to be a political or fashion statement?
Do I really need to say it?
This is getting ridiculous.
The topic of the 'pattern' thread you spun this thread from is indeed ridiculous.
I got the idea from an Associated Press article published Sunday that notes that killings of policemen has jumped about 20 to 25% in 2009 compared to 2008 and we still have another month to report.
The article noted several cases, some of which I researched and found that the killings were accomplished by men with radical muslim backgrounds, the AP article failed to mention that fact at all.
The AP did mention the availability of guns was part of the problem and in all fairness did briefly, at it's end mention that there seemed to be more killings in areas with stricter gun laws and fewer in areas with less restrive gun laws.
My point is this, just why is it verboten to mention that many of these killings were done by men who are associated with muslim groups that preach hatred and even violence to accomplish their goals??????
That leads to another question, why do we have federal 'hate crimes' to protect some segments of our population, particularly if the victim belongs to a group considered to be a minority, including muslims but don't prosecute these murders of American policemen as hate crimes, which they certainly are and you can also state as fact that policemen are in the minority also.
Why is it only a hate crime if the victim is of a minority??
Why Wouldn't the torture, mutilation murders of the two UT students be considered a hate crime? It certainly was one of the most hateful of crimes I've ever heard of.