If voter fraud is proven in Ga

#301
#301
BigOrangeTrain said:
EL will never admit it. The proof has been right in the public eye. Yet he and the other mouth breathers will not admit it because orange man bad.
Click to expand...


Very true. As more and more evidence comes out we need to keep putting this out there. Not trying to beat a dead horse and I know we are stuck Biden for a little while but every American deserves to see these things that the media refuses to report and make up their own mind what happened. People need to look at the evidence and make up their own minds whether or not our elections are secure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: davethevol and AM64
#302
#302
VolinWayne said:
Very true. As more and more evidence comes out we need to keep putting this out there. Not trying to beat a dead horse and I know we are stuck Biden for a little while but every American deserves to see these things that the media refuses to report and make up their own mind what happened. People need to look at the evidence and make up their own minds whether or not our elections are secure.
Click to expand...

Evidence? More like:
 
  • Like
Reactions: TN Ribs and OHvol40
#303
#303


🚨 FRAUD ANOMALY 🚨

Can’t be explained. The evidence is right there. Just putting out there for folks to make up their own mind.
 
#304
#304
burntorangeVOLffle said:


🚨 FRAUD ANOMALY 🚨

Can’t be explained. The evidence is right there. Just putting out there for folks to make up their own mind.
Click to expand...


The hasidic community votes in the NYC were bonkers. They went all in on Trump. One of the Monsey area districts was 100% Trump.
 
#305
#305
 
#306
#306
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and VolinWayne
#308
#308
Not a bit of proof of fraud.

The real fight here is that some republicans want to disenfranchise millions of American voters AFTER they voted by following the rules presented to them in their states. It is not a fight over whether there is fraud because there isn't enough to even warrant an investigation. Notice, republicans aren't screaming for an investigation into the voter fraud proven when Trump took the dead mother vote in Pa. They want to not count millions of votes which were cast in accordance with the rules of states at the time of the election. I don't even know whether the rules were violative of voting laws, but the entire premise is unamerican.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DJimgo
#309
#309
ClearwaterVol said:
Not a bit of proof of fraud.

The real fight here is that some republicans want to disenfranchise millions of American voters AFTER they voted by following the rules presented to them in their states. It is not a fight over whether there is fraud because there isn't enough to even warrant an investigation. Notice, republicans aren't screaming for an investigation into the voter fraud proven when Trump took the dead mother vote in Pa. They want to not count millions of votes which were cast in accordance with the rules of states at the time of the election. I don't even know whether the rules were violative of voting laws, but the entire premise is unamerican.
Click to expand...

I think it has more to do with states changing their voting rules without going through their legislatures, ie changing the rules improperly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol737, AM64 and VolinWayne
#310
#310
hog88 said:
I think it has more to do with states changing their voting rules without going through their legislatures, ie changing the rules improperly.
Click to expand...

There is a fair argument regarding this issue on the other side, as well.

And that was the argument I was laying out. The Trump club wants to disenfranchise millions of voters that followed the rules which were given to them. After the fact, Trump wants to make these arguments and silence millions of voters that made their choice clear. It is downright unamerican.
 
#311
#311
ClearwaterVol said:
There is a fair argument regarding this issue on the other side, as well.

And that was the argument I was laying out. The Trump club wants to disenfranchise millions of voters that followed the rules which were given to them. After the fact, Trump wants to make these arguments and silence millions of voters that made their choice clear. It is downright unamerican.
Click to expand...

On the flip side. Didn't the states that didn't go through the proper procedures to change they way people can vote possibly disenfranchise the voters that followed the old rules?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and VolinWayne
#312
#312
  • Like
Reactions: evillawyer
#313
#313
hog88 said:
On the flip side. Didn't the states that didn't go through the proper procedures to change they way people can vote possibly disenfranchise the voters that followed the old rules?
Click to expand...

No, because they would not have followed rules which were published and in effect for this election. Besides, these rule changes all addressed mail in voting. If you were in compliance before you would still be in compliance.
 
#314
#314
ClearwaterVol said:
No, because they would not have followed rules which were published and in effect for this election. Besides, these rule changes all addressed mail in voting. If you were in compliance before you would still be in compliance.
Click to expand...

So do you have any problems with non-elected state state officials or even governors changing laws outside of the respective legislative process?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#315
#315
ClearwaterVol said:
Not a bit of proof of fraud.

The real fight here is that some republicans want to disenfranchise millions of American voters AFTER they voted by following the rules presented to them in their states. It is not a fight over whether there is fraud because there isn't enough to even warrant an investigation. Notice, republicans aren't screaming for an investigation into the voter fraud proven when Trump took the dead mother vote in Pa. They want to not count millions of votes which were cast in accordance with the rules of states at the time of the election. I don't even know whether the rules were violative of voting laws, but the entire premise is unamerican.
Click to expand...



If you honestly don't believe there was fraud please take the time to check this out. There are lots of questions that need to be answered for the sake of future elections.. Also, Professor Clements does a good job of explaining why the courts refused to see the evidence
https://www.theprofessorsrecord.com/
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#316
#316
VolinWayne said:
If you honestly don't believe there was fraud please take the time to check this out. There are lots of questions that need to be answered for the sake of future elections.. Also, Professor Clements does a good job of explaining why the courts refused to see the evidence
https://www.theprofessorsrecord.com/
Click to expand...
The courts didn't refuse. When asked the Trump lawyers didn't have any evidence to present and never claimed fraud anyways
 
  • Like
Reactions: USAFgolferVol, ClearwaterVol and volfanhill
#317
#317
ClearwaterVol said:
Not a bit of proof of fraud.

The real fight here is that some republicans want to disenfranchise millions of American voters AFTER they voted by following the rules presented to them in their states. It is not a fight over whether there is fraud because there isn't enough to even warrant an investigation. Notice, republicans aren't screaming for an investigation into the voter fraud proven when Trump took the dead mother vote in Pa. They want to not count millions of votes which were cast in accordance with the rules of states at the time of the election. I don't even know whether the rules were violative of voting laws, but the entire premise is unamerican.
Click to expand...

Have you ever noticed we have a problem (often legal) in this country. You can't challenge a plan because it hasn't been put into effect. You can't challenge it after because it is too late ... should have been done before and it will disenfranchise victims of the scam. The other tactic courts use to avoid doing the right thing ... there isn't time to investigate and make it right; that way you can always keep a fraudulent system operating because no one (officially) cares until the next installment is up and then it's too late ... again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolinWayne
#318
#318
utvolpj said:
The courts didn't refuse. When asked the Trump lawyers didn't have any evidence to present and never claimed fraud anyways
Click to expand...

Since the states had the evidence all neatly locked up, challengers couldn't produce direct evidence of fraud. The best they could do was show evidence that fraud existed ... which is neatly excluded as "real evidence". There's a reason you can't fight city hall.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolinWayne
#319
#319
AM64 said:
Since the states had the evidence all neatly locked up, challengers couldn't produce direct evidence of fraud. The best they could do was show evidence that fraud existed ... which is neatly excluded as "real evidence". There's a reason you can't fight city hall.
Click to expand...
They didn't do that and didn't claim fraud in court, only twitter
 
  • Like
Reactions: ClearwaterVol and volfanhill
#320
#320
AM64 said:
Have you ever noticed we have a problem (often legal) in this country. You can't challenge a plan because it hasn't been put into effect. You can't challenge it after because it is too late ... should have been done before and it will disenfranchise victims of the scam. The other tactic courts use to avoid doing the right thing ... there isn't time to investigate and make it right; that way you can always keep a fraudulent system operating because no one (officially) cares until the next installment is up and then it's too late ... again.
Click to expand...

They challenged the process in Pa prior to the election and Pa's Supreme Court ruled against them. As I said, there is a credible argument against the circumventing the legislature argument.

As for Professor Clements - He is relying on mostly debunked theories.
 
#321
#321
AM64 said:
Since the states had the evidence all neatly locked up, challengers couldn't produce direct evidence of fraud. The best they could do was show evidence that fraud existed ... which is neatly excluded as "real evidence". There's a reason you can't fight city hall.
Click to expand...


Very good anology. Also the simple fact that there absolutely never was the least bit of transparency throws up huge red flags to any normal human being.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#322
#322
ClearwaterVol said:
They challenged the process in Pa prior to the election and Pa's Supreme Court ruled against them. As I said, there is a credible argument against the circumventing the legislature argument.

As for Professor Clements - He is relying on mostly debunked theories.
Click to expand...

What's been debunked by whom?? Debunking involves more then just taking the other sides word for it.. Dominion has been lying through their teeth about their machines being secure. This has been proven by many people.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#324
#324
evillawyer said:
Boom! We finally got some voter fraud evidence in Georgia!

Click to expand...


user-images%2Fde%2Fde29d2f7e271d944f58cd56144b07121.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sin City Vol, NashVol11 and volfanhill
#325
#325
This is some earth-shattering stuff. I think they just got married. This is from the article:

Election records show that Blanchard used her Atlanta address to return an absentee ballot, which she mailed in October from the couple’s residence in Westlake, Texas. Blanchard also owns a home near Buckhead.

“If we’re residents in both places, is that legally wrong?” Blanchard said when reached by The Atlanta Journal-Constitution on Monday. “If you have multiple homes, you can’t vote where you have a home?”

Blanchard followed up Tuesday, saying she considers herself a resident of Georgia, where she has a driver’s license, owns a car and does business. She didn’t answer a question about whether she spends more time at her Georgia or Texas property.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top