I don't think there are very many weak personalities on here that are going to think like you want them to. You are wasting your time and energy. You are entitled to think as you wish and others are entitled to think as they wish. Chasing every post to try and get them to think "your way" will be a time consuming and fruitless endeavor...
Hugh Freeze had a year of coaching at Ole Miss under his belt before recruiting for 2013. He had a few moral victories and Rebels are showing major improvement on the field. I don't understand why you would expect a brand new coach (unproven in the SEC) who has just inherited an embarrassment of a program to do as well...regardless of how much he and staff were paid (for 2 months). And facilities mean jack if recruits are afraid that they could be potentially signing a letter binding them to a school that could change coaches 3 times during their college career. And, yes, Vonn Bell would have absolutely made this class impressive...or at least,very good. Not Florida good. Not Alabama good...but considering the circumstances...VERY good. And, since when is being an optimistic fan...or a realistic fan relative to being a rival. We all want UT to be top tier and an SEC championship contender....I guess some of us are seeing the silver lining and some of us are just moaning.
Beautifully stated Volgrl. Just go easy on the reason, facts and logical conclusions while OregonVol and OskieVolum are lurking.
Just so I have this straight, in your mind, the notion that UT is an "embarrassment of a program" compared to Ole Miss and the idea that the signing of Vonn Bell alone would have made the 2013 class "impressive" by UT's standards, constitutes "facts". But questioning Butch Jones' recruiting prowess based on a signing class that finished 11th in the SEC, behind Vanderbilt demonstrates a deficiency of logic? Nice to know what I'm dealing with here.
After having only 2 months to sign said class and still finishing top 25 nationally, I would say its acceptable given that dools burned EVERY SINGLE damn BRIDGE he could on his way to destroying the program.
Do u have a clue of what u r talking about?? Do u even understand the state the program was in when Dooley took over?? If you think he destroyed the program u are just ignorant.
Also, please pt me to the list of all the bridges he burnt on the way out. I would ask u to list them all yourself but according to u its soooo long i reckon it would take to much time to type them all out. I haven't seen such a list that merits a comment like "EVERY SINGLE damn BRIDGE," so if I'm someone that needs to learn the "facts" show them to me. Thanks bud :hi:
What is wrong with people on here? Why can't you just admit that Butch did not succeed with this year's class? Is it so hard to admit that your hero has any failures? There is a difference between being a fan and being a sycophant.
Now, we're making excuses for him by using Hugh Freeze as an example? Seriously? You do realize that Freeze's staff ("one of the best recruiting staff in the nation") makes a fraction of what UT's staff is paid, right? You realize his facilities and fanbase are a far cry from UT's? You realize that Ole Miss has about a 40 year history of being an SEC doormat?
I'm getting sick of "fans" at UT making excuses for their coach by comparing him to Ole Miss' coach or Vanderbilt's coach. You did that during the Dooley era too (and maybe that's why we had to suffer through 3 years of that loser). We should expect our coach to do better than that. We shouldn't be saying "well, if you look at this other recruiting site or if you factor in the number of players, etc. we maybe did better than Vanderbilt." It's Vanderbilt! You shouldn't have to say, "Well, we can't expect him to have the recruiting success of Ole Miss' coach, but maybe if we give him time, he'll come close." He'd better be a step above Ole Miss' coach.
You're never going to catch the Floridas and Alabamas of the world, when all you care about is lowering your expectations and coming up with subjective arguments as to why your guy might someday be better than the coaches at the worst programs in the conference.
Do u have a clue of what u r talking about?? Do u even understand the state the program was in when Dooley took over?? If you think he destroyed the program u are just ignorant.
Also, please pt me to the list of all the bridges he burnt on the way out. I would ask u to list them all yourself but according to u its soooo long i reckon it would take to much time to type them all out. I haven't seen such a list that merits a comment like "EVERY SINGLE damn BRIDGE," so if I'm someone that needs to learn the "facts" show them to me. Thanks bud :hi:
Do u have a clue of what u r talking about?? Do u even understand the state the program was in when Dooley took over?? If you think he destroyed the program u are just ignorant.
Also, please pt me to the list of all the bridges he burnt on the way out. I would ask u to list them all yourself but according to u its soooo long i reckon it would take to much time to type them all out. I haven't seen such a list that merits a comment like "EVERY SINGLE damn BRIDGE," so if I'm someone that needs to learn the "facts" show them to me. Thanks bud :hi:
In-game coaching was his problem? How'd you come up with that?
If anything, it seems like the expectation around here was the opposite. Coaching was solid, but recruiting was suspect. And obviously, he's knocked it out of the park with the latter.
It's safe to say that about ANY coach that lost to Dooley. But, I think most are just cautiously optimistic with good reason.
Someone didn't think Kiffin had passion? He has enthusiasm and passion, it was the whole no morals and inability to tell the truth that kinda reared its head.