chattavol420
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2011
- Messages
- 7,129
- Likes
- 7,816
Buckeye fan here. Been reading this thread over the past week or so to get your side's perspective on Tate's recruitment. Been enjoying it, lots of good info and I love a fanbase that cares. However, aside from all that, is the presiding thought really that OSU is some second rate program that is only good because it's in the "weak" Big Ten? Asked another way, if Tennessee and Ohio State flipped conferences, do you think Tennessee would be more successful in the Big Ten than Ohio State is? And that Ohio State would be less successful in the SEC than Tennessee is?
edit to give my point of view: I concede that the SEC is absolutely better than the Big Ten overall. My view is that Ohio State basically operates like a top SEC team, and that if you dropped them in the SEC, they'd compete for titles along with Georgia, Bama, and LSU. They obviously wouldn't be winning the conference every year like they do in the Big Ten, but they wouldn't be a middling SEC program either.
If Ohio state had to play bama and uga every year along with an additional 7 sec games…they’d definitely not end the year with the same record as they have enjoyed in recent years. Same as Clemson. However, just based on talent on the rosters I’m sure they’d still win a bunch of games. And I’m sure the committee would take into consideration strength of schedule and give them more leniency when choosing their teams. As is…teams outside the sec really have to be undefeated to get in the 4 team playoff.