Biggest hole:
Sacks. Not sure what sack rate is, probably not terrible, but total sacks we are near the bottom. Don't have access to sack rate, but I'd imagine we're closer to just average.
Yeah. It may be semantics but I took LittleVol's tone to be negative. IIRC, he is somewhat negative toward Heupel.
I didn't calculate it but I suspect UT is near the bottom on sacks/attempt too. I don't deem it a "hole" for a couple of reasons. One, UT was great at the "big play"... meaning they traded holding the ball and taking a few more sacks for some of those bombs they hit. Two, UT was still very good compared to the SEC in 3rd down conversions. Versus the SEC, UT was 4th behind Bama, MSU, and UK.... ahead of UGA and Ole Miss by a fairly significant margin.
Beyond that, rushing YPC is 34th. Sacks play a part in that too. Not a big hole, but room for improvement.
Overall we're 17th in YPP. 24th in 3rd down%. 30th in RZ TD%. 13th in points per play.
Most importantly, we were 17th in points per possession.
I'm pretty confident in saying we have a top-20 caliber offense (unadjusted for SoS), that's out of 130 teams...with a top notch schedule. We have room for improvement. I would say sacks are a "hole". Beyond that, we're very solid-to-great across the board. Jmo
Nothing to disagree with there except I generally look at the Vs SEC numbers a little more than national. For instance, the Vols were 7th nationally in scoring. But if they had played the schedules of WKU, Pitt, WFU, or Coastal Carolina... I'm pretty sure they would be closer to #1.
I think there is room for improvement. But a "hole" to me indicates something you fail to do. Something you can't do that you are trying to do.
The bottom 6 rushing O's in the SEC in order were Auburn, Bama, USCe, Vandy, LSU, and MSU. I think you'd be fairly accurate in saying that Bama and MSU decided to ride their passing game. I think you'd be accurate in saying that the inability to run the ball represents "holes" in the performance of Auburn, Vandy, USCe, and LSU.