Illinois gov teaching sex ed

#2
#2
If passed into law, the Responsible Education for Adolescent and Children's Health, or REACH Act would start sex ed in kindergarten through second grade with lessons on personal safety and respecting others.
Click to expand...

The horror

it's health class
 
#11
#11
allvol123 said:
The soft ignorance of "well it is just blah blah" is just as dangerous as the ignorance of those that create such nonsense as this.

It is hard to imagine supporting anything passed by a state legislature in the name of education.
Click to expand...
No, the jump is to act like they'll suddenly force 5yo to watch gay porn from racistjoes personal collection. I know everyone at my hs took a health class that was pretty graphic and we also had them in middle. What is the difference?
 
#13
#13
utvolpj said:
No, the jump is to act like they'll suddenly force 5yo to watch gay porn from racistjoes personal collection. I know everyone at my hs took a health class that was pretty graphic and we also had them in middle. What is the difference?
Click to expand...

Who jumped to that, I didnt.

HS and middle you reference. This is elementary.

How about a public school system that by and large sucks, focus on fundamentals.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jaybird_1981, MemphisVol77 and AM64
#15
#15
allvol123 said:
Who jumped to that, I didnt.

HS and middle you reference. This is elementary.

How about a public school system that by and large sucks, focus on fundamentals.
Click to expand...
I have 2 in elem and don't see an issue based on the generic definition.
 
#16
#16
utvolpj said:
No, the jump is to act like they'll suddenly force 5yo to watch gay porn from racistjoes personal collection. I know everyone at my hs took a health class that was pretty graphic and we also had them in middle. What is the difference?
Click to expand...

You're so ignorant. If you can't see the road we're going down when it comes to morality. you must be really desensitized if you think itd no big deal. You honestly think they'll not teach a pro sodomy lesson? You obviously haven't read about hiw communist schools indoctrinated kids at a young age and how they did not allow any parental influence on their kids. Only a morally warped individual sees no issue with this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman, Zues1 and TNVOLNAVY
#17
#17
utvolpj said:
No, the jump is to act like they'll suddenly force 5yo to watch gay porn from racistjoes personal collection. I know everyone at my hs took a health class that was pretty graphic and we also had them in middle. What is the difference?
Click to expand...

You're the morally Repugnant one, id say if anyone has gay porn it would you. Normally when one's own morality is compromised they'll have no issues puting it on someone else.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman
#20
#20
"Grades 3-5 would cover anatomy, sexual orientation, gender identity and gender expression "

Sounds to me like this is a way for the state to indoctrinate children with transgender garbage (i.e. "gender fluidity"). Which is what the left has been pushing for a while.

This doesn't belong in schools. This doesn't belong anywhere near children.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MemphisVol77, AM64, Weezy and 8 others
#22
#22
Volgolfer1618 said:
You're so ignorant. If you can't see the road we're going down when it comes to morality. you must be really desensitized if you think itd no big deal. You honestly think they'll not teach a pro sodomy lesson? You obviously haven't read about hiw communist schools indoctrinated kids at a young age and how they did not allow any parental influence on their kids. Only a morally warped individual sees no issue with this.
Click to expand...
Sounds like you could use a sodomy lesson. Maybe you'd relax and realize how ridiculously ignorant your posts in here are.

I have kids in schools and so do my friends and have not experienced this widespread indoctrination you always claim. The curriculum was laid out for you and you ignore it in favor of some made up fantasy land run by evil libruls.
 
  • Like
Reactions: USAFgolferVol
#24
#24
Volgolfer1618 said:
I bet you're that parent who'd have no issues with them getting it on at your house once they're in jr high. As long as they use protection right?
Click to expand...
Look, I realize occasional missionary under covers with the lights off is the way you roll but that's not normal for everyone. It's hard when a modern world tears down your ridiculous ideas huh?
 
  • Like
Reactions: volfanhill
#25
#25
Matt2496 said:
"Grades 3-5 would cover anatomy, sexual orientation, gender identity and gender expression "

Sounds to me like this is a way for the state to indoctrinate children with transgender garbage (i.e. "gender fluidity"). Which is what the left has been pushing for a while.

This doesn't belong in schools. This doesn't belong anywhere near children.
Click to expand...
It was in schools 30yrs ago. Why does it not being now?
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top