In B4 LG starts the DOJ brings suit VS Georgia thread.

#27
#27
RockyTop85 said:
This is not how the statute reads.


https://static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2021/04/Georgia-election-law-SB-202.pdf

Each use of the words “nor shall” indicates a separate and distinct prohibition.

You cannot solicit votes in any manner or by any means or method, (If what follows was all just about soliciting or enticing then it would be redundant because it’s already encompassed by “any means or method”)

You cannot distribute or display any campaign material.

You cannot give, offer to give, or participate in the giving of any money or gifts, including, but not limited to, food and drink, to an elector,

You cannot solicit signatures for any petition. (For your version to be correct, this would have to be an enticement. It’s not.)

You cannot establish or set up any tables or booths on any day in which ballots are being cast, unless you’re an election official.
Click to expand...
I'm trying to figure out what it is that I got wrong.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40, volinbham and hog88
#31
#31
hog88 said:
Been the law in TN for decades. Suck it up buttercup.
Click to expand...
That's what makes the "Jim Crow" argument so dishonest. When compared to other states, Georgia's law is actually pretty moderate. States like Delaware and Connecticut don't even have early voting. Let me know when the protest begins in Dover.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40, SpaceCoastVol, RollinVol and 2 others
#32
#32
GAVol said:
That's what makes the "Jim Crow" argument so dishonest. When compared to other states, Georgia's law is actually pretty moderate. States like Delaware and Connecticut don't even have early voting. Let me know when the protest begins in Dover.
Click to expand...

It’s complete theater. If GA had just reverted to the pre-pandemic voting process it would be harder to vote than it is with the changes this law brings.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40, LouderVol, hUTch2002 and 1 other person
#37
#37
Weezer said:
For a detailed list, ask your wife. Guarantee she knows.
Click to expand...
I don’t know Ga’s wife.
He’s seems smart enough to analyze himself, but this group is more than willing to help him if he wants a 2nd opinion

Edit: unless your saying my wife would know what GaVol got wrong……which would be accurate. She knows what’s wrong with everyone
 
  • Like
Reactions: GAVol and Weezer
#38
#38
Orangeslice13 said:
I don’t know Ga’s wife.
He’s seems smart enough to analyze himself, but this group is more than willing to help him if he wants a 2nd opinion

Edit: unless your saying my wife would know what GaVol got wrong……which would be accurate. She knows what’s wrong with everyone
Click to expand...
Red could probably spend a week just detailing what's wrong with you. And that would still be just the cliff notes.
 
#40
#40
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary, StarRaider, 825VOL and 2 others
#41
#41
Hunerwadel said:
Can anyone explain the reasoning behind passing a law that someone cannot bring food or water to someone waiting in line to vote? I mean other than knowing some will get thirsty and leave joining those who already got tired and left. The fact that black voters throughout Georgia have to wait in much longer lines than white voters is well established.
Click to expand...
All you have to do is give it to a volunteer. No idea why this constantly gets ignored.
 
#42
#42
GAVol said:
...Which nobody seems to want to notice.

This is simply a large state where Democrats have made gains and they want to accelerate the process.
Click to expand...
Expanded voting on the WEEKENDS, not sure how that's racist. Saturdays required (were optional), sundays are now optional (werent allowed before)

Expanded early voting.

Vote by mail NOW officially allowed.

ALL polling locations REQUIRED to have AT LEAST one drop off box.

Anyone who argues this restricts voting is smoking crack. If people want they can say it didnt go far enough, but that's not RESTRICTING votes
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40
#43
#43
This lawsuit tells you everything you need to know about Merrick Garland and what an unethical POS he is. To think that this guy was a nominee to be a supreme court justice and pull this kind of banana republic crap is inexcusable. This maneuver is plainly political and if the independent and moderate democrats don't see what is happening and continue to vote for democrats our country is doomed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Carl Pickens and SpaceCoastVol
#45
#45
RockyTop85 said:
This is not how the statute reads.


https://static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2021/04/Georgia-election-law-SB-202.pdf

Each use of the words “nor shall” indicates a separate and distinct prohibition.

You cannot solicit votes in any manner or by any means or method, (If what follows was all just about soliciting or enticing then it would be redundant because it’s already encompassed by “any means or method”)

You cannot distribute or display any campaign material.

You cannot give, offer to give, or participate in the giving of any money or gifts, including, but not limited to, food and drink, to an elector,

You cannot solicit signatures for any petition. (For your version to be correct, this would have to be an enticement. It’s not.)

You cannot establish or set up any tables or booths on any day in which ballots are being cast, unless you’re an election official.
Click to expand...
Ok…. So you can’t try to cheaply bribe someone with food or water…. That’s not racist
 
Last edited:
#46
#46
Carl Pickens said:
Ok…. Do you can’t try to cheaply bribe someone with food or water…. That’s not racist
Click to expand...
It doesn’t say you can’t try to “cheaply bribe” someone with food or water. It says you can’t give an elector (voter) food or water.

I didn’t say it was racist.
 
#47
#47
RockyTop85 said:
It doesn’t say you can’t try to “cheaply bribe” someone with food or water. It says you can’t give an elector (voter) food or water.

I didn’t say it was racist.
Click to expand...
Since you're an attorney maybe you can summarize for all of us luddites what legal standing is behind this lawsuit that claims it discriminates against blacks?
 
#48
#48
VolStrom said:
Since you're an attorney maybe you can summarize for all of us luddites what legal standing is behind this lawsuit that claims it discriminates against blacks?
Click to expand...
I can, but all I’m going to do is read this Link, which was linked in the article, and then summarize it.

Have you already read it? If so, it would save time to point out which part you didn’t understand.
 
#49
#49
RockyTop85 said:
I can, but all I’m going to do is read this Link, which was linked in the article, and then summarize it.

Have you already read it? If so, it would save time to point out which part you didn’t understand.
Click to expand...
I just read it and I'm still confused as to what is in the Georgia law that affects black people that doesn't affect white people. Please point that out since this will be argued in possibly up to the supreme court assuming the doj filed this in the 9th circuit?
 
#50
#50
VolStrom said:
I just read it and I'm still confused as to what is in the Georgia law that affects black people that doesn't affect white people. Please point that out since this will be argued in possibly up to the supreme court assuming the doj filed this in the 9th circuit?
Click to expand...

There is nothing racist, illegal or discriminatory in the law but that yahoo is going to follow his party and professions line.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Carl Pickens, Orangeslice13 and InVOLuntary
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top