evillawyer
Kung Fu Kamala, B*tches!
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2010
- Messages
- 31,876
- Likes
- 21,089
CDC estimates from 500k to 3 million.I know I've seen stuff and even cited it here before but not for some time. I found this:
Defensive Gun Uses in the U.S.
If you don’t do something stupid which requires somebody else to exercise their right of self defense you have nothing to worry about. And I literally laughed out loud on reading your first sentence. Just lay back and take it huh sister?I believe the right to self-defense is not a fundamental right. You have the right to self-defense BECAUSE you have the right to go on living. The wide availability of guns in society leads to widespread violation of the right to go on living. My argument has always rested on what's the better societal good. Overall, fewer guns in society makes us safer overall than widespread availability. Do you really debate something like that? For every justified homicide, like this case, there's probably 10 that are not "justified."
CDC estimates from 500k to 3 million.
Even at the low side that shatters EL's position that guns do more harm than good.
Of course he wont ever acknowledge any counter numbers, instead relying on court room inspired dodges and double talk to avoid the topic.
Do you think safety in America would get worse or better if l snapped my fingers and every privately-held gun disappeared?
SCOTUS clearly disagrees with your take on the issue. Read Heller some time.I think once you acknowledge that the right to self-defense is a derivative right and if you have tools that are supposed to enhance that derivative right but instead have the effect of infringing the underlying right that explains the derivative right, you have a pretty straightforward path to gun control.
Did they source or cite that data as coming from another entity?CDC estimates from 500k to 3 million.
Even at the low side that shatters EL's position that guns do more harm than good.
Of course he wont ever acknowledge any counter numbers, instead relying on court room inspired dodges and double talk to avoid the topic.
If you don’t do something stupid which requires somebody else to exercise their right of self defense you have nothing to worry about. And I literally laughed out loud on reading your first sentence. Just lay back and take it huh sister?
But it is a fundamental right. It isn’t covered under the “right” to go on living as you stated. You don’t get to impose on another and violate their rights to where they must defend themselves while claiming your right to go on living trumps that imposition. That’s just stupid.Saying the right to self-defense is not a fundamental right just means a more basic right explains it. In the same way plates exist even though plates are explained by something more fundamental (molecules, atoms, etc).
You start astray and get worse from there. I don't know if you can ever find your way back. I'm rooting for ya, though.
It is a highly self-perpetuating occupation. I would call it a profession but snake oil salesmen were "professionals" also.Lawyer think is weird. It's all focused around a library of laws and nitpicking things to death with respect to the verbiage. Not much of it actually makes sense outside the courtroom. If it were rational debate about matters, society would need far fewer lawyers.