Substantially less dangerous than not removing him.Well, you have no problem removing a duly elected President over hearsay. That's a joke, and dangerous to the country.
Apparently, some time in the future, when a Democrat is President, Luther, Septic and other liberals will have no problem with their President being removed from office over somebody supposedly hearing a story from somebody that heard it from somebody else, who heard it from somebody else. Maybe some Republican activist can even make up a story that he supposedly overheard.
I hope this happensApparently, some time in the future, when a Democrat is President, Luther, Septic and other liberals will have no problem with their President being removed from office over somebody supposedly hearing a story from somebody that heard it from somebody else, who heard it from somebody else. Maybe some Republican activist can even make up a story that he supposedly overheard.
If the democrat is even half as horrendously despicable as Trump, please do.Apparently, some time in the future, when a Democrat is President, Luther, Septic and other liberals will have no problem with their President being removed from office over somebody supposedly hearing a story from somebody that heard it from somebody else, who heard it from somebody else. Maybe some Republican activist can even make up a story that he supposedly overheard.
Apparently, some time in the future, when a Democrat is President, Luther, Septic and other liberals will have no problem with their President being removed from office over somebody supposedly hearing a story from somebody that heard it from somebody else, who heard it from somebody else. Maybe some Republican activist can even make up a story that he supposedly overheard.
Well, you have no problem removing a duly elected President over hearsay. That's a joke, and dangerous to the country.
It sets a bad precedent for a President to bow to Congress, and waive executive privilege.As dangerous as using tax payer dollars to extort a foreign country to help maintain political power? Dangerous like that?
One would think that if all this hearsay is such b.s., Trump would be clamoring to get all of the 1st hand guys like Mulvaney, Bolton and himself in front of congress, pronto.
Weird.
Apparently, some time in the future, when a Democrat is President, Luther, Septic and other liberals will have no problem with their President being removed from office over somebody supposedly hearing a story from somebody that heard it from somebody else, who heard it from somebody else. Maybe some Republican activist can even make up a story that he supposedly overheard.
It sets a bad precedent for a President to bow to Congress, and waive executive privilege.
As bad a precedent as extorting a foreign country with aid to help fight Russia unless they helped dig dirt up on a domestic political rival? That seems like poor precedent to set with regards to foreign policy. #trumpfirst?
Here is a better question...
Why do we owe any other country, allies or not, anything?
Our relationship should be based solely on what is best for the US citizen and if that means holding funds from a country to find out if an presidential candidate is involved in shady dealings how is that not best for the us citizen considering this knowledge is useful to make a rational voting choice.
Do you care more about the Ukraine or the US citizen?