gsvol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2008
- Messages
- 14,179
- Likes
- 11
By the way, no "scholars" would disagree with what I wrote about the Mecca and Medina Suras, it is common knowledge... should have been common for you as well, but...
What I meant by the term 'scholars' was islamic religious authorities.
So what you maintian is that the medina verses DO NOT take precendence over the mecca verses when they are not in agreement?
So to me that means you promote a dupliscious religion that has one story when dealing with adversaries from a postition of weakness and another story when dealing from a position of strength.
I am a scholar on Islam. (You do not say Islamic Scholar as it changes the meaning of the terms)
And you are wrong. If you looked at Islam historically, actually real history, you would see your fault; but you prove an ideologue forcing himself to see reason. I suggest you stop reading your "scholars" and read the Quran.
So in what islamic schools have you studied?
If I look at islam historically, actually real history, I see a bloody path that has slaughtered and enslaved countless millions of people.
I am having trouble finding your post denegrating the 'Zionists.'
At any rate, how do you know the plans of the so-called zionists?
If you are referring to the document referred to as the 'protocols of zion' this has proven to be a hoax and bogus as a three dollar bill.
Back during the late sixties I worked closely with some arab moslems and they were always 'zionists this' and 'zionists that' and there was seemingly no way to get them away from their dogma so I just quit associating with them.
I know of no authentic source for the plans of the zionists, perhaps you can enlighten me on that.
I do know the protcols are widely and falsely presented in the world of islam and the nazis did so also during the heyday of their very successful propaganda compaigns.