hog88
Your ray of sunshine
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2008
- Messages
- 117,286
- Likes
- 170,427
I listened to the section of the podcast you offered. I read some of the transcript as well. Thanks for sharing it.@McDad I think I conflated two things. I believe he was saying the deal in the 60's was a sham. I conflated it with problems surrounding this deal.
With regard to the Oslo Accords, he talked about how the PLO lost power to maintain the treaty after the peace negotiation because it wasn't popular with many Palestinians, but we also know Netanyahu has been supporting the rise of Hamas to undermine the PLO/PA.
If you're interested in hearing about that, go to 54:38
![]()
Two Israel-Palestine Historians Explain: How Did We Get Here? And What Happens Next?
Two historians share their thoughts on Israel’s military response, the future of the Israel-Hamas conflict, and the "missing moderate middle" on both sideswww.theringer.com
And that's probably the most informative episode, if you want to just do 1.
It's not my fault that you can't write what you mean and that you can't answer clear questions.You’re all over the map with nonsense here. My meaning was obvious. Only you could’ve read that and assumed I was claiming Irish people are Muslims. That’s on you, not me.
lol and now you want me to answer nonsense questions? Islam doesn’t incite Christian Palestinians into terrorism. You’re falsely pretending that these are equal. 50% of Palestinian terrorists are not Christians.
It's not my fault that you can't write what you mean and that you can't answer clear questions.
What are the cultural bases for Zionist, Irish, and Christian Palestinian terrorism and how do they differ from the basis of Muslim Palestinian terrorism?
Wrong color of money to be peaceful. Don't you know any terrorist accounting principles???I listened to the section of the podcast you offered. I read some of the transcript as well. Thanks for sharing it.
My comment, Netanyahu and the Israeli government decided to funnel money in an effort to bolster Hamas. Their political maneuvering predicated on the belief Hamas would continue to act as a terrorist organization and the west would condemn them. Hamas did what was predicted.
Does Hamas not have a choice? Could they have taken that aid and addressed their water supply, sewage, infrastructure instead of using money to be violent?
I listened to the section of the podcast you offered. I read some of the transcript as well. Thanks for sharing it.
My comment, Netanyahu and the Israeli government decided to funnel money in an effort to bolster Hamas. Their political maneuvering predicated on the belief Hamas would continue to act as a terrorist organization and the west would condemn them. Hamas did what was predicted.
Does Hamas not have a choice? Could they have taken that aid and addressed their water supply, sewage, infrastructure instead of using money to be violent?
You seem to be a pragmatist. Even though you have your emotional hot buttons...we all do...you seem to pursue logical fixes to complex issues. Such as a two state solution.Hamas definitely could have done that.
You can't really believe that if Muslims are terrorists it's because of their religion and if anyone else is then it's just human nature. Even you couldn't be that stupid. But I know from experience that you could be such a mindless cheerleader that you try to distort the truth. Remember that Europeans used political terrorism in Europe and Palestine well before Arabs did.This is like saying “women commit violence too”! “If it’s (insert testosterone or the Y chromosome here in place of Islam) that causes violence, then why do women commit so much violence”!
As I’ve told you many, many times now…those things aren’t equal.
You seem to believe they’re equal. So you’re continue to try to get me to answer a question that makes sense from your point of view, but not from mine.
I do not see these as equal. So when you ask why those terrorists exist too, my answer is “human nature”. All groups have a capacity for violence and all groups commit violence.
But that’s like saying “women commit murders too!”. Sure they do, but you’re ignoring the proportionality. The question that really matters is “why do males (Muslims in this case) do so far more frequently”
You can't really believe that if Muslims are terrorists it's because of their religion and if anyone else is then it's just human nature. Even you couldn't be that stupid. But I know from experience that you could be such a mindless cheerleader that you try to distort the truth. Remember that Europeans used political terrorism in Europe and Palestine well before Arabs did.
There's no difference in 'level' between terrorism committed by Muslims and that done by Zionists, Irish Catholics, Basque Catholics, Philippine and Indian and Russian and Peruvian, etc. Communists and others.
I understand what you're trying to say and it's absolute horseshxt.At this point you’re not even trying to understand what I am saying. Yes, there’s a difference. Muslims are more likely than others to commit terrorist acts. Human nature means all groups have members who have committed evil at some point. Muslim culture however openly encourages it. That’s the obvious difference here
I understand what you're trying to say and it's absolute horseshxt.
Zionists attacks after they achieved their objective? Nice try. Let's take Palestinian and Zionist terrorism starting in 1900. They're not so very different. What's the basis for each group's use of terrorism as a political tool?Okay. List for me Zionist terrorist attacks outside of the Middle East since 1990. For everyone you identify, I’ll provide 2 additional Muslim terrorist attacks outside of the Middle East since 1990.
If there’s no difference in proportionality, this shouldn’t be difficult for you.
You seem to be a pragmatist. Even though you have your emotional hot buttons...we all do...you seem to pursue logical fixes to complex issues. Such as a two state solution.
Here's what reasonable people will have to accept, we cannot bring logic and reason as a solution to an issue so entangled with emotions. Just thinking logically about the situation in Gaza as if I am a Palestinian, it's a crap place to live, there are no jobs, pitiful infrastructure, unhealthy, my government is more interested in terror plots than its people, always in danger, and there is no real ability to fight against my overpowered enemy. I would emigrate by any means necessary asap.
No doubt. Solutions have to make sense. But people in highly emotional states are not receptive. You're married, you understand perfectly when you and your wife are in the middle of a "heated fellowship" no one is listening or processing reason and logic.I still think you need to apply logic to the solutions, you just can't plan things as if the players are going to behave rationally/logically.