EasternVol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2021
- Messages
- 8,224
- Likes
- 6,227
Prove the claim you made. What counter-arguments to my current position should I look into, exactly?
I don't talk in circles. The claim you need to prove is the half trillion. And who are these Saints? What significance in any religion do they have? What is your religion, again?Do you just like talking in circles? I’ve made a couple of claims. Which specific claim would you like me to prove?
For one you could look at the work that nearly every church does in their community. You could ask yourself why there’s so many hospitals named after saints
If the goal for some is to spread Islam to all corners of the globe, I doubt we see a cessation any time soon.Even then he’s failing to see that islams goal isn’t regional nor is it limited to any one conflict. That’s why we can all name Muslim terrorist attacks across the globe.
It’s a cultural problem that he refuses to accept
I don't talk in circles. The claim you need to prove is the half trillion. And who are these Saints? What significance in any religion do they have? What is your religion, again?
And that is just in this country.Sure. I just glanced at the number quickly so I’m off by about a factor of four. Roughly 1/2 trillion is the overall charitable giving in this country and over 100 billion of that is from religious organizations.
Who are these saints? Do you live in a bubble? There’s numerous hospitals throughout the world named after Saints. Neither my religion nor the religion of any saint is relevant to the question.
If religious is as bad as you believe, how do you explain the massive good that comes from it?
![]()
6 charts that illustrate the surprising financial strength of American houses of worship
Fewer people belong to a congregation or identify as Protestant or Catholic. And yet, most congregations say their membership is growing or stable.theconversation.com
"Religious people are 25 percentage points more likely than secularists to donate money (91 percent to 66 percent) and 23 points more likely to volunteer time (67 percent to 44 percent)."And doesn’t include the value of people’s time that’s often donated
Looks like that link insinuates American philanthropy is tied to religion but doesn't provide any hard evidence (or any evidence, actually). Nice graphs though.Sure. I just glanced at the number quickly so I’m off by about a factor of four. Roughly 1/2 trillion is the overall charitable giving in this country and over 100 billion of that is from religious organizations.
Who are these saints? Do you live in a bubble? There’s numerous hospitals throughout the world named after Saints. Neither my religion nor the religion of any saint is relevant to the question.
If religion is as bad as you believe, how do you explain the massive good that comes from it?
![]()
6 charts that illustrate the surprising financial strength of American houses of worship
Fewer people belong to a congregation or identify as Protestant or Catholic. And yet, most congregations say their membership is growing or stable.theconversation.com
Which religious groups? And what are they donating to and volunteering for?"Religious people are 25 percentage points more likely than secularists to donate money (91 percent to 66 percent) and 23 points more likely to volunteer time (67 percent to 44 percent)."
![]()
Religious Faith and Charitable Giving
Believers give more to secular charities than non-believers dowww.hoover.org