Israel vs Palestinians

[Orangeslice13]

I thought about this post occassionally yesterday. It made me chuckle everytime. The Hades gif where he cracks wise and gets no love was the perfect exclamation point.

One of my better jokes, imo.

My favorite gifs

 

[Vol8188]

Guess we’ll see

Did you condemn anything at Columbia?

 

[NashVol11]

Did you condemn anything at Columbia?

Yeah, I condemn Columbia sending a billion cops there to beat up its own students

 

[NashVol11]

 

[Vol8188]

Yeah, I condemn Columbia sending a billion cops there to beat up its own students

So it’s bad if the right doesn’t condemn actions by both sides, but you also refuse to condemn both sides?

Weird.

 

[Vol8188]

Good.

 

[hog88]

Yeah, I condemn Columbia sending a billion cops there to beat up its own students

Can you believe that they are going to prosecute their own students? It's crazy to think an entity you send money to every year would prosecute you for protesting their actions.

 

[NashVol11]

 

[NashVol11]

Can you believe that they are going to prosecute their own students? It's crazy to think an entity you send money to every year would prosecute you for protesting their actions.

They won’t. They’ll make a show of this and then put up their pictures all over campus 10 years from now, patting themselves on the back for the student protests they themselves cracked down on, just like every other time

 

[Vol8188]

Lmfao “we should be able to take over your buildings if we disagree with you”

You should be arrested and mocked

 

[NashVol11]

So it’s bad if the right doesn’t condemn actions by both sides, but you also refuse to condemn both sides?

Weird.

Where did I say the right needs to condemn both sides? I don’t really care who the right condemns

 

[NashVol11]

Lmfao “we should be able to take over your Edmund Pettis Bridge if we disagree with you”

You should be arrested and mocked

Not hard to see which side you’d be on in the 60s

 

[McDad]

Lmfao “we should be able to take over your buildings if we disagree with you”

You should be arrested and mocked

Once the line protecting free speech is crossed, consequences are likely.

 

[Vol8188]

Where did I say the right needs to condemn both sides? I don’t really care who the right condemns

….

Guess we’ll see

 

[NashVol11]

….

That would be hilariously inconsistent, yes. Doesn’t mean everyone needs to “both sides” everything. Be smarter next time

 

[Vol8188]

Not hard to see which side you’d be on in the 60s

So properties don’t exist if people disagree with your political stances?

100% protestors should be arrested if they attempt to do “sit ins” or “take over buildings”.

If the police/legal system doesn’t protect property rights, then the property owners have to. That typically ends with far, far worse outcomes

 

[hog88]

They won’t. They’ll make a show of this and then put up their pictures all over campus 10 years from now, patting themselves on the back for the student protests they themselves cracked down on, just like every other time

You mean they shouldn't be prosecuted for interfering in the operation of the university and destroying property?

 

[NashVol11]

So properties don’t exist if people disagree with your political stances?

100% protestors should be arrested if they attempt to do “sit ins” or “take over buildings”.

If the police/legal system doesn’t protect property rights, then the property owners have to. That typically ends with far, far worse outcomes

Coming out and saying you would be on the side of the police during sit-ins in the 60s is certainly a choice

 

[NashVol11]

You mean they shouldn't be prosecuted for interfering in the operation of the university and destroying property?

Property meaning window glass or a table lol, no they shouldn’t and they won’t. I assume Columbia knows what a horrendous look that would be especially after yesterday

 

[Vol8188]

Coming out and saying you would be on the side of the police during sit-ins in the 60s is certainly a choice

I wouldn’t answer the question either if I were you

 

[EasternVol]

That would be hilariously inconsistent, yes. Doesn’t mean everyone needs to “both sides” everything. Be smarter next time

You're asking for a lot there.

 

[NashVol11]

Coming out and saying you would be on the side of the police during sit-ins in the 60s is certainly a choice

I wouldn’t answer the question either if I were you

Didn’t even say “no I wouldn’t” what a choice to volunteer that information unsolicited. This mf would be on here in the MLK spray-protestors-with-hoses era saying “Good. They didn’t follow the rules”

 

[volfanhill]

Coming out and saying you would be on the side of the police during sit-ins in the 60s is certainly a choice

If I were the president of the university I would permit protests that involved these clowns self-immolation. Outside of that not interested in putting up with their tantrums.

 

[hog88]

Property meaning window glass or a table lol, no they shouldn’t and they won’t. I assume Columbia knows what a horrendous look that would be especially after yesterday

So Columbia university is smarter than our DOJ?

 

[Vol8188]

Didn’t even say “no I wouldn’t” what a choice to volunteer that information unsolicited

Then answer the question. Do property rights not matter when protesting? If you disagree with me, do I loose my property rights?