Jamal Khashoggi

Qualifying for citizenship through generations of ancestry can be just as stupid. You want to grant American citizenship to children that were born to parents that have never lived in the US? That’s what the European countries you’re talking about do generally.

Never said that. I don't have a problem with the few territories we have like Guam and Puerto Rico, but no we shouldn't award citizenship to parents who are really not US citizens except by a piece of paper. Your side is the one expanding that possibility through anchor babies and the birth tourism industry that flourished under obama - particularly the Chinese babies that got the certificate and went to China with the parents.
 
I'm sure that special consideration would only be for journalists that support his brand of politics.
Or in other words, the truth.


as opposed to those beloved trumpian alternative facts.
 
Last edited:
No it's not. I'm sure I could find incidents of journalists being present caused service members to die.

When we commit our military to combat the president needs to give them an objective then GTF out of the way and let them get it done.
Maybe the truth brings a quicker end to the conflict, saving far more lives than the presence of journalists caused.

Vietnam is a pretty decent example.
 
Thanks.
Is it your position that he did not deserve to be targeted?
My position is that he did not receive his constitutional t
right to due process. That the country largely yawned, as evidenced by the numerous Obama supporters who always say they have never heard of this, at the idea of a POTUS granting himself the right to assassinate a US citizen. No recourse.
 
My position is that he did not receive his constitutional t
right to due process. That the country largely yawned, as evidenced by the numerous Obama supporters who always say they have never heard of this, at the idea of a POTUS granting himself the right to assassinate a US citizen. No recourse.
I see it more as the cops shooting a guy who is raising his gun. No trial, no due process.....bang. That is justifiable.

If they shoot an unarmed man walking away, different story.

A person's actions can negate their right to due process.
 
I see it more as the cops shooting a guy who is raising his gun. No trial, no due process.....bang. That is justifiable.

If they shoot an unarmed man walking away, different story.

A person's actions can negate their right to due process.


This is the single dumbest position you have taken. Side note: If Trump were the first POTUS to do this, as supposed to Obama, you would be screaming for an impeachment.
 

VN Store



Back
Top