Let's not kid ourselves, Hornsby was always expendable. He was a backup plan and with our late surge, his offer has been withdrawn.
This discussion has been ridiculous from day one, though.
Everyone keeps saying, "He used a dead girl's credit card. He's scum."
Dead people own nothing! The deceased have no worldly possessions. Death is a release from material items.
To continue to refer to one, Ashley Slonina, as that "dead girl" is completely disrespectful to her life. It's just people looking for an excuse to point fingers and project anger.
He was charged with "misdemeanor larceny of a credit card and felony fraudulent use of a credit card."
He was charged with larceny; he didn't sell opium to a 5-yr old. He's not a rapist or a serial killer.
His lawyer stated that he was given permission to use the card. If that's true and he didn't know her parents footed the bill, then should we put her on trial? Should we talk about what a bad person she was for making her parents put gas in her friends' cars?
If he was just making these purchases, thinking the credit card company would shut the card off and no one was going to ever have to pay it---then he's guilty of being naive.
He made very bad decisions, but the argument has been so juvenile and absurd from day one.
She had a name---she had a life. She is not "dead girl." If people want to put this kid on trial for the foolish things he did, then people need to become more submerged in the details of what happened.
I have never taken a public stance on him one way or the other, but I do find it offensive that no one has bothered to investigate or to ask any intelligent questions on the matter.
Gator dismissed, faces charge of using dead woman's credit card - St. Petersburg Times