January 6 Retribution Begins

Dems sure called foul in 2000. Then again in 2016.
Yep, but not nearly to the extreme as 2020. Not remotely close. Trump cried it 2016 as to the popular vote. Spent far more money than Hillary investigating it. I get nuance and detail don't factor into your simplistic generalizations.
 
Yep, but not nearly to the extreme as 2020. Not remotely close. Trump cried it 2016 as to the popular vote. Spent far more money than Hillary investigating it. I get nuance and detail don't factor into your simplistic generalizations.

You asked a question and got an answer you didn't like.
 
How many Presidential elections did you call foul on before the con man, grifter deluxe told you he was cheated?
Your Dems called foul and contested all Repub wins starting in 2000 I believe.

Now that you're here - Do you believe that on Jan 6, 2021 that there was a clear and coordinated attempt to overthrow the government of the United States from Donald Trump and his supporters at his rally?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
Oh, but he is. Trump supporters are living life on a record with scratches on it that just skips and skips forever.

Trump supporter: "There is no evidence Trump did anything wrong!"

Show him the evidence.

Trump supporter: "There is no evidence Trump did anything wrong!"

Followed by, "The election was stolen!"

Ask to see evidence of that and there is none.

"The election was stolen!"


View attachment 605529


And on and on it goes....
Your assumptions are great. I like it. I've been asking questions that you all are too scared to answer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol
Your Dems called foul and contested all Repub wins starting in 2000 I believe.

Now that you're here - Do you believe that on Jan 6, 2021 that there was a clear and coordinated attempt to overthrow the government of the United States from Donald Trump and his supporters at his rally?
Not a"Dem"

No. Just a bunch of dumbed downed idiots protesting
 
You asked a question and got an answer you didn't like.
Uh huh. Huge differences between them. Only pointing out your answer was without substance and generalized. Sorry to tell you it wasn't about "liking" or "disliking" it. Nice effort at a false narrative
 
Uh huh. Huge differences between them. Only pointing out your answer was without substance and generalized. Sorry to tell you it wasn't about "liking" or "disliking" it. Nice effort at a false narrative

You didn't ask for substance.
 
Except your response was neither contextual or relevant to my question, which you deflected from with ease
You easily lean left, it's obvious. You came at me from that angle. I'm asking questions. I'm new to the board and am trying to get how people really feel instead of perusing thousands of messages in each thread. You can learn a lot from asking basic questions. I've already been labeled as a MAGA Trumper and haven't mentioned anything about who I vote for, or rather against. Politics is polarizing and I get it. Also, everything I do is with ease baby.
 
I actually didn't ask you for anything. By all means, please provide some substance for a change. Back it up with something more than "the Dems protested the election too" if you choose to do so.

Why? You would just whine and argue about that too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
You easily lean left, it's obvious. You came at me from that angle. I'm asking questions. I'm new to the board and am trying to get how people really feel instead of perusing thousands of messages in each thread. You can learn a lot from asking basic questions. I've already been labeled as a MAGA Trumper and haven't mentioned anything about who I vote for, or rather against. Politics is polarizing and I get it. Also, everything I do is with ease baby.
What view have I espoused that would lead you to believe I lean left?
 
I found that it was suspicious that Donald was whining about the election being rigged long before any votes were cast.

That's because the election was rigged with vote by mail fraud well before the first votes were cast; to say the plan was flawed because it was ill conceived and poorly implemented would be unbelievably generous and misleading. Dems had a goal to circumvent election rules, and they did it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BreatheUT
That's because the election was rigged with vote by mail fraud well before the first votes were cast; to say the plan was flawed because it was ill conceived and poorly implemented would be unbelievably generous and misleading. Dems had a goal to circumvent election rules, and they did it.

Donald wasn't that far into it to know that was the tack he was taking. He's always claimed EVERYTHING that has gone against him was rigged. Hillary called him on it in 2016 in debates - he's always been the "victim" of forces conspiring against him.

Maybe it was "rigged" but he's the little boy that's cried wolf for too long. In the absence of verifiable evidence recognized by a court of law - rational people are shrugging the MAGA claims of "rigged" as just another in the long line of him whining about being a victim.
 
Here's the whining lady in action. Amazing how she thinks she's being unjustly punished.


Should have just waited until the Capitol police invited them in because we all know that totally would have still happened if hundreds of people hadn’t broken in making it impossible to maintain the perimeter and forcing them to evacuate members of congress.
 
Ok. Is that it?

I also think it's incredibly suspicious that none of the claims of election fraud were brought before a court of law were found to be credible. It leads me to believe that either there was no widespread election fraud as claimed on social media OR that there was multi state and district collusion of judges to find that the evidence being presented wasn't credible.

Really it boils down to whether or not social media "claims" weigh more than the judgment of legal experts?
 
  • Like
Reactions: NashVol11

VN Store



Back
Top