Sudden Impact
Who we are is what We do with what We have!
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2007
- Messages
- 13,710
- Likes
- 6,988
That's your right and duty when you serve as a juror to see it that way.and current known evidence doesn't prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Jaylen is guilty of AGGRAVATED assault. I would not guilty until the cows come home.
You didn't need to be here. It was on ESPN. It was in Knoxville papers. You know, 4 players don't get busted for barging in a dorm room and then picked up with weed every day at UT. This isn't Miami or FSU.I don’t live on this message board. Life got busy so these days I basically just pop in and out during the actual season and I don’t do tv or cable, I stream the games. I used to be in the PF a bit but it’s been about a year or more out of there since I have a low tolerance for stupidity and wasn’t willing to risk getting booted from the site. So no, your mentioning it is the first I’ve heard of it.
You didn't need to be here. It was on ESPN. It was in Knoxville papers. You know, 4 players don't get busted for barging in a dorm room and then picked up with weed every day at UT. This isn't Miami or FSU.
Surely you know who Kaidon Salter was? The invasion was "strike 1" and getting caught with weed again got him dismissed.
I have no idea what actually happened, and neither does anyone else here. The only thing we have to go off of is one person's side of the story (alleged victim) taken down by a second person (police officer) and summarized by a third party (media) and now being argued about by a significantly less than neutral party.
If what has been written is accurate both in the letter and spirit it was written though, then McCollough was in the wrong and has let down his teammates.
Again, I have no knowledge if that's the case. But I do know that making false statements in a police report can be prosecuted. I also can't help but notice that McCollough's reps. haven't disputed the assault allegation.
I really, really, really want us to beat Bama and this Saturday feels like our best chance in years. I also know those odds decrease when we lose starters. But no matter how much I want to win, it doesn't deprive someone of their right to not be assaulted or give someone else the right to commit assault.
I believe everyone is innocent until proven guilty and he should be allowed to play until the verdict comes in. AK is playing in the NFL this year and his assault charges have been going on for over 6 months now.I have no idea what actually happened, and neither does anyone else here. The only thing we have to go off of is one person's side of the story (alleged victim) taken down by a second person (police officer) and summarized by a third party (media) and now being argued about by a significantly less than neutral party.
If what has been written is accurate both in the letter and spirit it was written though, then McCollough was in the wrong and has let down his teammates.
Again, I have no knowledge if that's the case. But I do know that making false statements in a police report can be prosecuted. I also can't help but notice that McCollough's reps. haven't disputed the assault allegation.
I really, really, really want us to beat Bama and this Saturday feels like our best chance in years. I also know those odds decrease when we lose starters. But no matter how much I want to win, it doesn't deprive someone of their right to not be assaulted or give someone else the right to commit assault.
Heupel's call was to dismiss two players and give a second chance to Salter and Willis.Not having cable or watching TV actually means no ESPN, which is trash anyhow, and not living in the Knoxville area means no Knoxville papers.
Freshman QB if I remember right from occasionally checking the RF around signing time. Eldest child who does watch TV only mentioned in passing that we’d lost a Fr. QB for weed but that was it and I was like damn, that sucks. He was gone and I was busy so I didn’t bother looking into it.
Good, he should have been booted off the team and why didn’t it happen after “strike 1”?
Heupel's call was to dismiss two players and give a second chance to Salter and Willis.
Salter got caught, if I recall, running with no lights or no brake lights or something like that down Cumberland late one night a few weeks later with a car full of weed smoke and some weed. He got "redeemed" by Hugh Freeze at Liberty, where I think he's starting.
Willis transferred to Houston but kept his nose clean as far as I know until he did.
So Heupel has shown he can decide these things on a case by case situation so JM may be given a chance and the so called "short leash." It's the felony charge..... if KPD sticks to that..... which makes this one tough both fot Heupel and JM.
If JM were the one with missing teeth, you'd be insisting he's the victim, not alleged, but clearly the victim because he's missing teeth, etc.
It's the squirming to find any possible way this guy could be lying and JM can be made out to be completely innocent....... when if JM had been down those stairs bleeding you'd want the puncher's head on a platter.
You're the problem.
You didn't need to be here. It was on ESPN. It was in Knoxville papers. You know, 4 players don't get busted for barging in a dorm room and then picked up with weed every day at UT. This isn't Miami or FSU.
Surely you know who Kaidon Salter was? The invasion was "strike 1" and getting caught with weed again got him dismissed.
Good grief, looks like he lost one tooth. Based on initial reports it sounded like he was in a coma with multiple facial fractures.Yes there is and here is that 4 page KPD initial incident report along with the photos of the stairs, Tank’s hand and Zion’s injuries.
https://www.outkick.com/wp-content/uploads/VOLS-ARREST-PUBLIC-RECORDS.pdf
If JM were the one with missing teeth, you'd be insisting he's the victim, not alleged, but clearly the victim because he's missing teeth, etc.
It's the squirming to find any possible way this guy could be lying and JM can be made out to be completely innocent....... when if JM had been down those stairs bleeding you'd want the puncher's head on a platter.
and current known evidence doesn't prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Jaylen is guilty of AGGRAVATED assault. I would not guilty until the cows come home.
The one that is talking is more than likely is the one that is lying and exaggerating the story by getting ahead of it.Good grief, looks like he lost one tooth. Based on initial reports it sounded like he was in a coma with multiple facial fractures.
No, if anything I would be biased against JM if he were the drunk person as they tend to be the poor judgement sh!t starters in most situations.. if you are wandering around disoriented at 3pm you have problems and an injury of some sort was probably going to happenIf JM were the one with missing teeth, you'd be insisting he's the victim, not alleged, but clearly the victim because he's missing teeth, etc.
It's the squirming to find any possible way this guy could be lying and JM can be made out to be completely innocent....... when if JM had been down those stairs bleeding you'd want the puncher's head on a platter.
View attachment 499735View attachment 499736
If McCollough did indeed follow the guy out of the apartment and punch him, he did intentionally cause bodily harm, so yes he assaulted the other. And, while not a lawyer/judge/on the jury, I'd say breaking of teeth would be considered "serious bodily injury". So, based on what's known so far, yes he committed aggravated assault.