JFK assassination expert: Lee Harvey Oswald lone gunman theory is ‘bulls–t’

#8
#8
The "Warren Commission" concluded "the shots which killed President JFK & wounded Governor Connally were fired by Lee Harvey Oswald".
A 2017 poll taken by FiveThirtyEight found only 33% believe that Oswald alone killed Kennedy.

Assassination of John F. Kennedy
 
#9
#9
0nelilreb said:
“ Back and to the left , Back and to the left , Back and to the left “. Anybody that hunts.. knows what that means .
Click to expand...

No, the initial blood spray was foward, the back and to the left was the secondary action. The car is going foward, the brain matter initially goes foward. That tells me the bullet came out in front the of the skull
 
  • Like
Reactions: rjd970
#10
#10
Volaholic320 said:
No, the initial blood spray was foward, the back and to the left was the secondary action. The car is going foward, the brain matter initially goes foward. That tells me the bullet came out in front the of the skull
Click to expand...
If it exited the skull in the front, then there should have been a large exit wound around the right side of his face.

Also, lets play along with your assertion that there was forward movement of the head. I would say that is probably correct and it probably did come from a bullet from the rear. But he was also clearly hit with a fatal shot from the front. There is no disputing that if you have eyes to see even the edited version of the Zapruder film. He was hit almost simultaneously by two head shots. The first from the rear and a millisecond later the fatal shot that hit his right temple.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols
#11
#11
GreyWolf1129 said:
We do. E. Howard Hunt laid it all out. The rest is simply connecting the dots.
Click to expand...
What particular story? I know he had a death bed confession, but he also made some claims while he was alive that seemed to be rather confusing.

Also, do you think we was one of the 3 Tramps found in the railcar?
 
#12
#12
Rasputin_Vol said:
If it exited the skull in the front, then there should have been a large exit wound around the right side of his face.

Also, lets play along with your assertion that there was forward movement of the head. I would say that is probably correct and it probably did come from a bullet from the rear. But he was also clearly hit with a fatal shot from the front. There is no disputing that if you have eyes to see even the edited version of the Zapruder film. He was hit almost simultaneously by two head shots. The first from the rear and a millisecond later the fatal shot that hit his right temple.
Click to expand...

The bullet it The right corner of this head, so bullet basically tore the right upper side off, so there is no pure bullet exit wound due to hitting the edge of his school. There no 2 shots simultaneously, there would have been way more damage. The head did not move foward, the blood splatter is the key
 
  • Like
Reactions: rjd970
#13
#13
Volaholic320 said:
The bullet it The right corner of this head, so bullet basically tore the right upper side off, so there is no pure bullet exit wound due to hitting the edge of his school. There no 2 shots simultaneously, there would have been way more damage. The head did not move foward, the blood splatter is the key
Click to expand...
And what about the blood and bone fragments blown on to the trunk of the limo? What about the piece of occipital bone found the next day on the south side of Elm Street?
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols
#14
#14
Rasputin_Vol said:
And what about the blood and bone fragments blown on to the trunk of the limo? What about the piece of occipital bone found the next day on the south side of Elm Street?
Click to expand...
The wind caused by the moving car would have blown those pieces backwards. The pieces landed on the left side of the car, yet all the damage was on the right side of the brain.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rjd970
#16
#16
Rasputin_Vol said:
What particular story? I know he had a death bed confession, but he also made some claims while he was alive that seemed to be rather confusing.

Also, do you think we was one of the 3 Tramps found in the railcar?
Click to expand...

If not then it is someone who looks exactly like him. For you or anyone else who would like to read probably the best book I have read regarding the JFK assassination…and I have read most of them…I would recommend “Best Evidence”, by David Lifton.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols and Smokey X
#19
#19
GreyWolf1129 said:
If not then it is someone who looks exactly like him. For you or anyone else who would like to read probably the best book I have read regarding the JFK assassination…and I have read most of them…I would recommend “Best Evidence”, by David Lifton.
Click to expand...
While I have your attention for a moment, can I ask you a few questions?
1. How much has police policy changed over the past 60+ years?
2.!is it reasonable, considering how nosy and inquisitive cops are today, that a cop would interview a person at a murder scene to not get their name or contact information?
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols
#20
#20
Rasputin_Vol said:
While I have your attention for a moment, can I ask you a few questions?
1. How much has police policy changed over the past 60+ years?
2.!is it reasonable, considering how nosy and inquisitive cops are today, that a cop would interview a person at a murder scene to not get their name or contact information?
Click to expand...

Ras, you asked, so I will give you my honest opinion. On that note, there are a number of current / former Peace Officers on this board, so maybe they will see this and chime in as well...

1. I can only speak back to 2000 (1993 if you count my time as an MP), but the change is difficult if not impossible to describe here. Mind you, I only have experience to speak of from 3 agencies, all in SE Georgia, but the way we operate now in no way resembles what we did way back then. I'd like to think we have become more professional, educated, trained, and developed. I know I have. But much like chain restaurants, the level of service varies from agency to agency. Some are still stuck in the 90's, and some are so far to the left now that they almost have to ask your permission to arrest you.

2. No. I have some experience here, both as "first on scene", and as an investigator. The initial canvass is critical. Identify everyone who might know anything, or be involved in any way. Coppage 101.

Hope that helped.

Oh..."Best Evidence" refers to the body, which is the best evidence of what happened to JFK. Once you know "what", then you can work on "how". Solid book. If you really want to know what happened, this is a good place to start your quest.

Happy Hunting. When you finish that, we can talk about RFK and MLK. It was a decade of assassinations, and we've been lied to about all 3 of those.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols, SlipKidVol, Vol737 and 1 other person
#21
#21
GreyWolf1129 said:
Ras, you asked, so I will give you my honest opinion. On that note, there are a number of current / former Peace Officers on this board, so maybe they will see this and chime in as well...

1. I can only speak back to 2000 (1993 if you count my time as an MP), but the change is difficult if not impossible to describe here. Mind you, I only have experience to speak of from 3 agencies, all in SE Georgia, but the way we operate now in no way resembles what we did way back then. I'd like to think we have become more professional, educated, trained, and developed. I know I have. But much like chain restaurants, the level of service varies from agency to agency. Some are still stuck in the 90's, and some are so far to the left now that they almost have to ask your permission to arrest you.

2. No. I have some experience here, both as "first on scene", and as an investigator. The initial canvass is critical. Identify everyone who might know anything, or be involved in any way. Coppage 101.

Hope that helped.

Oh..."Best Evidence" refers to the body, which is the best evidence of what happened to JFK. Once you know "what", then you can work on "how". Solid book. If you really want to know what happened, this is a good place to start your quest.

Happy Hunting. When you finish that, we can talk about RFK and MLK. It was a decade of assassinations, and we've been lied to about all 3 of those.
Click to expand...
My 2 questions were mainly directed at the murder of Officer Tippet in Oakcliffe. It’s interesting that you would mention the officer “first on scene” because that is specifically who I’m referring to at the 10th and Patton murder scene.
 
Last edited:
#22
#22
I saw a forensic show once where they re-created the scene exactly as it was that day in Dallas. Same angles, distance, speed, rifle, etc. then took someone that had taken marine marksman training and had them fire the 3 shots in the allotted amount of time against a ballistics dummy, complete with consistent skull and skeleton in the car. Playing the two videos (Zapruder and re-creation) were uncanny similar, and the injuries were almost exact, down to the secondary injuries to others caused by the “magic bullet”. It was also pretty conclusive that “back and to the left” was consistent with a re-entry wound to the back of the head with splatter out the front.

Now there are a lot of things surrounding the assination in the background they rightfully cause a moment of pause, and I don’t believe the multiple gunmen or conspiracy can/should be ruled out. But the lone gunman theory is certainly possible.
 
#23
#23
rjd970 said:
I saw a forensic show once where they re-created the scene exactly as it was that day in Dallas. Same angles, distance, speed, rifle, etc. then took someone that had taken marine marksman training and had them fire the 3 shots in the allotted amount of time against a ballistics dummy, complete with consistent skull and skeleton in the car. Playing the two videos (Zapruder and re-creation) were uncanny similar, and the injuries were almost exact, down to the secondary injuries to others caused by the “magic bullet”. It was also pretty conclusive that “back and to the left” was consistent with a re-entry wound to the back of the head with splatter out the front.

Now there are a lot of things surrounding the assination in the background they rightfully cause a moment of pause, and I don’t believe the multiple gunmen or conspiracy can/should be ruled out. But the lone gunman theory is certainly possible.
Click to expand...
Anyone can create an animated video to spread their narrative. Just like they did with the 9/11 videos.
 
  • Like
Reactions: davethevol
#24
#24
Rasputin_Vol said:
Anyone can create an animated video to spread their narrative. Just like they did with the 9/11 videos.
Click to expand...

This wasn’t an animated video. It was physically recreated down to almost every detail other than actually doing it on the plaza. Even filmed from the same angle.
 
#25
#25
I don't have anything to add, but it seems pretty implausible to me that a sniper with a bolt action rifle could fire three times at a moving car and hit a body three times in the head/neck. But to be honest, it's been 60 years and if there was a conspiracy or more than one shooter, they're either dead or damn close to it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top