Orangeburst
Attention all Planets of the Solar Federation
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2008
- Messages
- 47,009
- Likes
- 107,495
(2022-1963)+18=?
JFK was assassinated because he wanted to blow the lid off of alien visitors.
Nice. Where did you end up going?Make it 17, and I'll be 76 this July. The "64" you see over on the left refers to the year I graduated from HS and entered UT. I actually have a lot of letters signed by Estes Kefauver and Albert Gore (Sr) because UT was an afterthought - I planned to go the the Air Force Academy until the AF decided in 1963 they only wanted pilots going there - did get two alternate nominations to West Point and one to Annapolis as consolation prizes.
Nice. Where did you end up going?
The very same thing could be said about the people that believe in the lone gunman theory. There is nothing I can likely do to shake you off of that belief.Right, but would would constitute “debunking” and “dismissing”? Again, I’m not ruling it out, but typically with conspiracy theorists I find that no matter the evidence and case against it they are entrenched and will just find another hole in the theory, or some other missing or available piece of evidence.
It’s like with the religious, it is exceedingly rare that such entrenched beliefs change with the insertion of evidence. It’s always “but what about” questions after being continually answered. Beliefs are like pedals that once pushed are exceedingly hard to let off of again.
Anyone ever try to cycle and fire three shots with a Mannlicher-Carcano rifle in the time it supposedly took Oswald to do it? Against a moving target? Maybe Oswald was just a whole lot better than I give him credit for, but I doubt it.
How do you explain the shot that hit him in the lower thoracic region of his back?
Anyone ever try to cycle and fire three shots with a Mannlicher-Carcano rifle in the time it supposedly took Oswald to do it? Against a moving target? Maybe Oswald was just a whole lot better than I give him credit for, but I doubt it.
The very same thing could be said about the people that believe in the lone gunman theory. There is nothing I can likely do to shake you off of that belief.
I saw a forensic show once where they re-created the scene exactly as it was that day in Dallas. Same angles, distance, speed, rifle, etc. then took someone that had taken marine marksman training and had them fire the 3 shots in the allotted amount of time against a ballistics dummy, complete with consistent skull and skeleton in the car. Playing the two videos (Zapruder and re-creation) were uncanny similar, and the injuries were almost exact, down to the secondary injuries to others caused by the “magic bullet”. It was also pretty conclusive that “back and to the left” was consistent with a re-entry wound to the back of the head with splatter out the front.
Now there are a lot of things surrounding the assination in the background they rightfully cause a moment of pause, and I don’t believe the multiple gunmen or conspiracy can/should be ruled out. But the lone gunman theory is certainly possible.
I have an m91 carcano. Not the same gun that was used but same workings. I’ve attempted the shot and distance on a stationary target several times. I don’t think it can be done.Anyone ever try to cycle and fire three shots with a Mannlicher-Carcano rifle in the time it supposedly took Oswald to do it? Against a moving target? Maybe Oswald was just a whole lot better than I give him credit for, but I doubt it.
I saw this also. It was interesting. However, I still think there were multiple shooters.I saw a forensic show once where they re-created the scene exactly as it was that day in Dallas. Same angles, distance, speed, rifle, etc. then took someone that had taken marine marksman training and had them fire the 3 shots in the allotted amount of time against a ballistics dummy, complete with consistent skull and skeleton in the car. Playing the two videos (Zapruder and re-creation) were uncanny similar, and the injuries were almost exact, down to the secondary injuries to others caused by the “magic bullet”. It was also pretty conclusive that “back and to the left” was consistent with a re-entry wound to the back of the head with splatter out the front.
Now there are a lot of things surrounding the assination in the background they rightfully cause a moment of pause, and I don’t believe the multiple gunmen or conspiracy can/should be ruled out. But the lone gunman theory is certainly possible.
Fun fact, I’ve had the privilege to meet and work with Dr. Wecht on several occasions (while he was doing routine autopsy work in my area). Brilliant man, also very funny. He likes to cut up a good bit.WARNING: video is very graphic
JFK assassination expert: Lone gunman theory is still ‘bulls--t’
I do not believe we will ever know who was really responsible
My guess is they didn’t expect Oswald to get far, and he was so confused that nothing he said would make sense. Ruby was tied to the mob, and they probably threatened to kill any family members he had as well as associates.I'm not discounting a conspiracy/cia involvement.
The person that made me question a conspiracy is Jack Ruby. If Oswald was a hired hitman and Ruby was hired to take him out why was Ruby allowed to live another 3+years before his death with the possibility to spill the beans on who hired him? Why not a " heart attack" a " suicide" .
Additionally why not kill Oswald before he was allowed to be arrested.
Seems a bit sloppy planning the biggest assassination in history, in broad daylight with hundreds of possible witnesses and the assassin allowed to escape.