evillawyer
Kung Fu Kamala, B*tches!
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2010
- Messages
- 31,876
- Likes
- 21,089
I cannot count the number of times I've seen that, either, because I've never seen it. Not saying it does not happen. I'm saying that you are focusing on such abuses and exaggerating in order to draw attention away from the fact that there are a lot of poor people in this country who work forty hours a week without being able to pay rent and put food on the table for their children, because you don't care.
The poor do pay less for clothes. They buy off the rack not tailored. And a consumption tax properly recognizes that. In fact the rich who are cheap bastards and buy off the rack are rewarded for being miserly.The price of everything is regressive if you ain't got no money. Duh. Should the poor pay less for clothes because clothing takes up a larger percentage of their check. Less for cigs, tats, utility bills, etc?
They should have made better choices and not ended up trying to support a family on minimum wage.I cannot count the number of times I've seen that, either, because I've never seen it. Not saying it does not happen. I'm saying that you are focusing on such abuses and exaggerating in order to draw attention away from the fact that there are a lot of poor people in this country who work forty hours a week without being able to pay rent and put food on the table for their children, because you don't care.
Why is it his responsibility to take these ambiguous people whom he most likely has no connection with and support them with his wages and labor? These BS emotional pleas don’t work.I cannot count the number of times I've seen that, either, because I've never seen it. Not saying it does not happen. I'm saying that you are focusing on such abuses and exaggerating in order to draw attention away from the fact that there are a lot of poor people in this country who work forty hours a week without being able to pay rent and put food on the table for their children, because you don't care.
That's measuring by income. Look it up when measured by expenditures which is a better indicatorAs always homeslice, you're wrong
Who would bear the burden of a VAT?.
I said it. I really don’t care about ambiguous people somewhere that I have no connection with. I’m not antagonistic to their situation it’s more apathy. I’m more inclined to be supportive of people like this within my community and thus the Fed can let me keep that money and use it locally. Compulsory charity is no longer charity.So you admit it. You don't care if working people cannot afford to feed their families. Why can't you be honest enough to say it? You do not care.
I'm just using the standard definition of regressive taxationThat's measuring by income. Look it up when measured by expenditures which is a better indicator
I was there. Two young sons and I’m only making $5.25/hour delivering furniture. My wife not making much more than that. It sucked and every day was a struggle. I had no one to blame but myself and my lack of effort. Not even my mythical white privilege could overcome a lack of training and experience. So, I decided to sacrifice my family life and get a CDL. I was a truck driver for nearly 25 years.So you admit it. You don't care if working people cannot afford to feed their families. Why can't you be honest enough to say it? You do not care.
Owning your own situation and fixing it doesn’t help their dependency agenda.I was there. Two young sons and I’m only making $5.25/hour delivering furniture. My wife not making much more than that. It sucked and every day was a struggle. I had no one to blame but myself and my lack of effort. Not even my mythical white privilege could overcome a lack of training and experience. So, I decided to sacrifice my family life and get a CDL. I was a truck driver for nearly 25 years.
Caring only makes you feel better about yourself, unless you adopt a poor family and help them.