Except we know a lot of what really happened. And knowing what we do know, acting like this is some unbelievable accusation is quite stupid.
Also, I know you're a troll, but this is hilarious coming from you, Mr. "You all hate me cuz I'm black". Or do you only believe accusations when you make them?
Nah. Every "business owner" in Happy Valley that ever gave a discount to JoePa, Sandusky, or any coach who may have known and did nothing helped a predator prey on children because of his position with the football team. The school can still give an education to its students but that school and community should be made an example of that any person who ever knows of this kind of assault and doesn't report it is just as guilty as the perpetrator. Letting their precious football program survive gives the next person ANYWHERE an excuse to not report, which is precisely how this evolved since the 80s.
Sandusky would still have been a predator, but it's obvious that many people in the program and school had some knowledge and did nothing for decades because of their football team. Disgusting.
So the restaurant owner who gave JoePa a free meal or the barber who cut his hair helped aide and abet a molester? I'm sure they were well aware of what was going on in the showers....
Yes. Even though they knew nothing about the abuse they helped create an environment in which people came to the decision that it was better to not report sexual abuse with a minor because it would have hurt the football program.
Taking away football from PennState doesn't PUNISH anyone. Many universities throughout the country do not have football at the D1, power 5 conference level. My opinion is that having a football team and a top tier program is a privilege for a school, not a right. And if sexual abuse to a minor was unreported or reported and not followed through by ANYONE in the football administration than the school should lose the privilege of having a football program.
Sandusky and the people who failed to report or failed to investigate reports of Sandusky abusing children are the ones who ruined PennState football. It the shoe was on the other foot and it happened at UT I would argue the same position and start liking basketball or baseball more.
Yes. Even though they knew nothing about the abuse they helped create an environment in which people came to the decision that it was better to not report sexual abuse with a minor because it would have hurt the football program.
Taking away football from PennState doesn't PUNISH anyone. Many universities throughout the country do not have football at the D1, power 5 conference level. My opinion is that having a football team and a top tier program is a privilege for a school, not a right. And if sexual abuse to a minor was unreported or reported and not followed through by ANYONE in the football administration than the school should lose the privilege of having a football program.
Sandusky and the people who failed to report or failed to investigate reports of Sandusky abusing children are the ones who ruined PennState football. It the shoe was on the other foot and it happened at UT I would argue the same position and start liking basketball or baseball more.
I really don't understand this, since Pa and Sandusky weren't even really friends...did Joe care that much about winning and he thought he needed JS? Even that seems like a stretch of an explanation.
I would appreciate it if you could give one single shred of support for this position.