Kamala Harris ‘ready’ to debate JD Vance

I wouldn’t really call what I wrote an opinion as much as a description of an OPPORTUNITY. I don’t think anyone would disagree that the rust belt will be the key battleground going forward. All I am saying is that IF the Republicans play it right and be gracious winners, they could flip the electoral map for decades to come. That is why I think Trump made the pick he did
It's still just an opinion but...
1721171157131.png
 
Nope. School officials and parents would have condemned any boy for such a thing. Parents would demand you be expelled, to make themselves look good, -protective, holy and all that, the administration would have publically shamed you. And the behavior of the "look at me and my azz" girls would be portrayed as innocent victims. And what these girls did is nothing compared to other stuff they pulled off. Anyone harboring the idea of girls being sugar and spice, daddy's little angels, was never a high school student. And that goes for so-called religious and private schools as well. Which in my view were worse because the stricter you are, it seems it provokes both curiosity and clandestine defiance.

But nevermind that, the Trump-Vance ticket is practically a can't miss candidacy. In the movie, "I care A Lot" there was a dirt bag lady who exploits elderly people out of their homes and bank account. When the mother of Roman Lunyov (Peter Dinklage) was victim, she knew her son would hear of it. Hr response to dirt bag was, "OHHHHH! You're trouble now." And that's what the Biden and the Demos face now. They're in deep trouble. Couple with Elon Musk's 45M/day bankrolling Trumpie's war chest, it's game, set, and match. Not that it matters much now, but if Dems are serious about evicting Biden, they better do it now. Then focus on putting together the strongest possible ticket team. But seriously, it's too late anyway. Putin wins.
Did you mean to close that with "America wins". You accidentally misspelled it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol
Did you mean to close that with "America wins". You accidentally misspelled it.
You people don't or refuse to realize that Trumpie is essentially, Putin's lapdog. But that's OK, the reality will hit down the road. And I will laugh my head off because when one decides to arrogant and ignorant by choice, they deserve it. For now, I'm doing a web search to see if my state allows me to enter a write in candidate. If so, Putin is who I will enter.
 
You people don't or refuse to realize that Trumpie is essentially, Putin's lapdog. But that's OK, the reality will hit down the road. And I will laugh my head off because when one decides to arrogant and ignorant by choice, they deserve it. For now, I'm doing a web search to see if my state allows me to enter a write in candidate. If so, Putin is who I will enter.
I don't get the Trump Putin stuff.

Do you think if Trump gets elected that Putin might invade Ukraine or something?
 
Alot of hurt feeling in this thread about Vance...seems like it a repeat of the same "mean tweets" that Trump gets...and for that being the big issue and then calling someone else oversensitive seems funny to me.
JD Vance will mop the floor with KH and will do so pretty easily.
I find it odd that you have addressed hurt feelings, sensitivity, and mean tweets as the focus for a political forum response/comment.
 
I don't get the Trump Putin stuff.

Do you think if Trump gets elected that Putin might invade Ukraine or something?
Too bad. I'm not going to endlessly explain my positions here. Seems you guys take turns asking the same questions periodically. I call it the ring-around-the-roses tactic.

Meanwhile, Putin isn't an option for me. He isn't eligible as per state law, so I can't unilaterally enter him. Guess it will be either the Kennedy guy, or swallow HARD to punch in ole Donnie.
 
Too bad. I'm not going to endlessly explain my positions here. Seems you guys take turns asking the same questions periodically. I call it the ring-around-the-roses tactic.
I guess trying to connect Orange to Putin for how many years now is NOT ring around the roses?

Give it up dude. Anyone with a brain knows Orange ain't trying to turn us into Russia.

It's getting ridiculous to keep saying it
 
I guess trying to connect Orange to Putin for how many years now is NOT ring around the roses?

Give it up dude. Anyone with a brain knows Orange ain't trying to turn us into Russia.

It's getting ridiculous to keep saying it
Then stop saying it. No one forces you to read my posts. And since I'm not in your army, I don't follow your orders. Got it?
 
Last edited:
Not to be siding with anybody, but your post above reflects how uniformed you are and you are basically asking a question that you should already know the answer. The fool is the one that has to ask this question on a chat board and is too lazy to reasonably research information readily available on Google for ever side you support.

The question is just garbage because any response will just be counter with more garbage. Google is your friend and the only difference in the answers you get depends on which side you support. Try figuring it out before you ask the question. Then counter. This is just crap stirring.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WoodsmanVol
Not to be siding with anybody, but your post above reflects how uniformed you are and you are basically asking a question that you should already know the answer. The fool is the one that has to ask this question on a chat board and is too lazy to reasonably research information readily available on Google for ever side you support.

The question is just garbage because any response will just be counter with more garbage. Google is your friend and the only difference in the answers you get depends on which side you support. Try figuring it out before you ask the question. Then counter. This is just crap stirring.
Lots to unpack here.
Not sure if I want to attempt it.

One thing before I quit posting again (not much of an arguer) you super sure about the bolded?
 
Lots to unpack here.
Not sure if I want to attempt it.

One thing before I quit posting again (not much of an arguer) you super sure about the bolded?
Not sure about anything. Plenty of arguments are based on Social Media Posts, Google research both good and bad, some lies, and ABC, NBC, CBS and Fox's take, add to that MSNBC, and CNN. Add to it the foreign govts media and input. No true facts really to be found.

Bottom line: It's all tribal and people are going to believe what they want.

Calling somebody out on this is all opinion which is fair but touting someone for not giving you the answer you wish to hear is foolish because within reason you can answer your own question, but that requires research from the other sides POV.

Both sides' views are correct and it comes down in the long run to personal preference of which one you support or don't. Think about the long term vs the short. Then find the happy medium between both views vs scrapping over the top.

More to unpack here as well.
 
JD Vance will mop the floor with KH and will do so pretty easily.
I find it odd that you have addressed hurt feelings, sensitivity, and mean tweets as the focus for a political forum response/comment.
Because literally the 1 issue that seems to be there is he speaks before he thinks(GOP way of putting it)., he responded to SNL with tweets so he is oversensitive ( left/liberal) way of putting ..this is the same mean tweets BS from 2016 Trump...and I agree I don't think it's even gonna be a good debate..because KH speaks in circlea and says nothing..
 
Because literally the 1 issue that seems to be there is he speaks before he thinks(GOP way of putting it)., he responded to SNL with tweets so he is oversensitive ( left/liberal) way of putting ..this is the same mean tweets BS from 2016 Trump...and I agree I don't think it's even gonna be a good debate..because KH speaks in circlea and says nothing..
But seriously who really cares if someone is sensitive or not and based on a response of an SNL tweet. This is just Fodder. JD Vance is more articulate, polished and people are going to vote for what lies they can bite into on both sides. JD has the ability to polish his lies and KH does not. Reasons it is not a draw is because JD is the new toy in the drawer and we witnessed what KH has done or not done. It is tribal.
 
But seriously who really cares if someone is sensitive or not and based on a response of an SNL tweet. This is just Fodder. JD Vance is more articulate, polished and people are going to vote for what lies they can bite into on both sides. JD has the ability to polish his lies and KH does not. Reasons it is not a draw is because JD is the new toy in the drawer and we witnessed what KH has done or not done. It is tribal.
We agree that he will beat KH. The rest is anti trump tribal BS so we agree on that as well..for once I'd like to see the left come after policy over feelings... as many on here literally have said about Trump "no problem with his policies, i don't like him" thats oversensitive and the same thing they blame on Trump and Vance...that's all ibwas commenting on..the rest we agree
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood
Alright, I’ve had time to learn about his views.

I don’t like his views on economics. He’s in the Tucker Carlson/Bernie Sanders realm there.

With that said, he will run intellectual circles around Kamala Harris in a way that will be as sad as watching Biden’s last debate performance
 
After the disastrous secret service protection of Trump, there is no way they are letting Kackles get anywhere near a debate stage with Vance. It would be a massacre.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol

VN Store



Back
Top