Kavanaugh Confirmation

[LouderVol]

Fair point

how is that a fair point? two different cases with two different subjects. probably different judges, I bet the opinions read differently etc etc. why should he have the same opinion on both?

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

Fair point

lulz.

 

[NEO]

Fair point

Does it bother you at all the Ginsburg is on record as admitting she originally voted for abortion for minority population control ( aka genocide) and only years later realized it was for woman’s rights?

These aren’t my words either.

She’s on record saying this.

May he views it as genocide like I do.

 

[NorthDallas40]

This isn't one sided. The treatment of Merrick Garland set the stage for this. Senate confirmation hearings and votes will be down party lines from now on... that will work out well for Kavanaugh but in the future? This is going to be a mess.

Incorrect. This all started with you lefties eviscerating Robert Bork lending to the slang term being “Borked”. You lefties are currently “Borking” Kavanaugh. Kudos.

 

[NEO]

I just have to follow up on my original post.
Ginsburg is on record for saying she passed legalized abortion to keep the population of races “we didn’t want!” down.

Those are her words!!!!

And by God, we have legally murdered over 50 million minority babies since.

Let that sink in....

Get your head out of your brainwashed ass and wake up. It was never about woman’s rights. That is a red herring handed out to the masses. It was about bringing back the Jim Crow laws veiled in woman’s rights.

It was always about screwing over black people!!!!

 

[volfanhill]

This isn't one sided. The treatment of Merrick Garland set the stage for this. Senate confirmation hearings and votes will be down party lines from now on... that will work out well for Kavanaugh but in the future? This is going to be a mess.

It should be very rare that a Presidents nominee, regardless of party, is not confirmed.

 

[McDad]

I just have to follow up on my original post.
Ginsburg is on record for saying she passed legalized abortion to keep the population of races “we didn’t want!” down.

Those are her words!!!!

And by God, we have legally murdered over 50 million minority babies since.

Let that sink in....

Get your head out of your brainwashed ass and wake up. It was never about woman’s rights. That is a red herring handed out to the masses. It was about bringing back the Jim Crow laws veiled in woman’s rights.

It was always about screwing over black people!!!!

Nobody cares. Killing babies for convenience is here to stay.

 

[NEO]

Nobody cares. Killing babies for convenience is here to stay.

I am sure at one point slaves and women wishing to vote felt the same way.

But it can change.

It just takes an enlightenment.

 

[BowlBrother85]

It should be very rare that a Presidents nominee, regardless of party, is not confirmed.

It should be even more rare (never) that a President's nominee doesn't even receive a vote.

 

[BowlBrother85]

Incorrect. This all started with you lefties eviscerating Robert Bork lending to the slang term being “Borked”. You lefties are currently “Borking” Kavanaugh. Kudos.

At least Bork did get a vote.

 

[SLICKYINC]

It should be even more rare (never) that a President's nominee doesn't even receive a vote.

Cry, cry, cry.

 

[volfanhill]

It should be even more rare (never) that a President's nominee doesn't even receive a vote.

I don’t disagree.

 

[NorthDallas40]

At least Bork did get a vote.

Thank Joe Biden for that particular whine. You’re welcome.

 

[McDad]

I am sure at one point slaves and women wishing to vote felt the same way.

But it can change.

It just takes an enlightenment.

Keep up the fight, then.

 

[BowlBrother85]

Thank Joe Biden for that particular whine. You’re welcome.

We've been over that before and of course, you're purely speaking in the hypothetical because the Democrats could have justified blocking the nomination of Clarence Thomas in 1991 (they had an overwhelming majority in the Senate - and a sexual harassment complaint on top of that) but they didn't. No Supreme Court nominee has ever been denied a vote before... until Garland.

 

[SLICKYINC]

Someone’s OCD is acting up again.

 

[NurseGoodVol]

Well, she’s fairly attractive. Outside of that, I agree - not a fan. I’m assuming, based on your avatar, you enjoy a nice bourbon. Kind of like Harvey Penick used to say, “If you play golf, you’re my friend.” Bourbon and golf are interchangeable in my world.

Is there anything else but bourbon?

 

[NurseGoodVol]

Attractive? If you Meant 20 years ago I would agree with you.

She caught willies eye or she had a political tower to climb and he was just the best first rung in the ladder.

 

[txbo]

We've been over that before and of course, you're purely speaking in the hypothetical because the Democrats could have justified blocking the nomination of Clarence Thomas in 1991 (they had an overwhelming majority in the Senate - and a sexual harassment complaint on top of that) but they didn't. No Supreme Court nominee has ever been denied a vote before... until Garland.

It wasn't denied. It was delayed....... but then your girl lost.

 

[T-TownVol]

It wasn't denied. It was delayed....... but then your girl lost.

Shhhhh.....he is on a roll.

 

[NorthDallas40]

It wasn't denied. It was delayed....... but then your girl lost.

Yep. They were smug they knew the Repubs were just delaying the inevitable... and then Nov 6 2016 happened.

 

[NurseGoodVol]

Booker isn’t Spartacus! I’m Spartacus!

‘Confidential’ Kavanaugh emails posted by Cory Booker were cleared, despite dramatic claim of defying rules

I think it's called saber rattling, you know the saber Corey was willing to throw himself down on rules be d*mned, I'll sacrifice everything to get this out to the public that, I, yes I, Corey Booker serve proudly and with distinction... Uh Corey you knew before the soliloquy ( that equaled a Shakespearean drama) it was released earlier...smh

 

[BowlBrother85]

It wasn't denied. It was delayed....... but then your girl lost.

No, that wouldn't have been Obama's nominee getting a vote... that would have been Clinton's nominee getting a vote and she would have nominated someone else. There is no reason to have not given Garland a vote. If the Republicans in the Senate wanted to vote him down? Fine... but make that vote.

 

[NorthDallas40]

No, that wouldn't have been Obama's nominee getting a vote... that would have been Clinton's nominee getting a vote and she would have nominated someone else. There is no reason to have not given Garland a vote. If the Republicans in the Senate wanted to vote him down? Fine... but make that vote.

I stated earlier today that if Ginsburg steps down on Trumps watch I think Garland would make a great candidate. An extremist court, in either direction, I don’t feel is good for the country. Kavanaugh even stated during his hearings that he’s a Garland fan. Admittedly what else will he say though. And frankly Garland isn’t what I would call an extremist candidate. When Barry picked him i read up and thought he was reasonably centrist and a solid pick.

 

[txbo]

No, that wouldn't have been Obama's nominee getting a vote... that would have been Clinton's nominee getting a vote and she would have nominated someone else. There is no reason to have not given Garland a vote. If the Republicans in the Senate wanted to vote him down? Fine... but make that vote.

That pesky ol' constitution sure can get in the way some times. I understand why you lefties hate it so much.