Kavanaugh Confirmation

#10,576
#10,576
evillawyer said:
Given that it is a job interview (and not a trial), that we're talking about a lifetime appointment to the most powerful court in the country, that the Court's legitimacy is absolutely tantamount (and certainly more important than the reputation of any one potential justice), and the difficulty of removing through impeachment a wrongly appointed justice, I would say your doubt doesn't even have to be "reasonable." For example, I think if you only believe there's a 20% chance Kavanaugh assaulted Ford, that may be sufficient to keep him off. Why take the risk when there are plenty in line without the cloud of suspicion that overhangs Kavanaugh?
Click to expand...
I would walk out of a job interview like that one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigOrangeTrain
#10,577
#10,577
I heard someone on a radio show say that if they hadn't seen her and just heard her testify that they would have never known it was her. Said she doesn't even talk like that. Said they ported her to look and sound like a little innocent school girl. Mentioned her glasses were different to portray the image. Can't remember but said they were not sure she wore glasses but I can't be 100% on that. I wonder if some old pictures of her pre testimony to see if that's true.
 
#10,578
#10,578
evillawyer said:
Given that it is a job interview (and not a trial), that we're talking about a lifetime appointment to the most powerful court in the country, that the Court's legitimacy is absolutely tantamount (and certainly more important than the reputation of any one potential justice), and the difficulty of removing through impeachment a wrongly appointed justice, I would say your doubt doesn't even have to be "reasonable." For example, I think if you only believe there's a 20% chance Kavanaugh assaulted Ford, that may be sufficient to keep him off. Why take the risk when there are plenty in line without the cloud of suspicion that overhangs Kavanaugh?
Click to expand...

So I take it you are proud at the way your party has conducted itself?
 
#10,579
#10,579
evillawyer said:
Given that it is a job interview (and not a trial), that we're talking about a lifetime appointment to the most powerful court in the country, that the Court's legitimacy is absolutely tantamount (and certainly more important than the reputation of any one potential justice), and the difficulty of removing through impeachment a wrongly appointed justice, I would say your doubt doesn't even have to be "reasonable." For example, I think if you only believe there's a 20% chance Kavanaugh assaulted Ford, that may be sufficient to keep him off. Why take the risk when there are plenty in line without the cloud of suspicion that overhangs Kavanaugh?
Click to expand...
😴😴😴😴
 
#10,580
#10,580
InVOLuntary said:
I heard someone on a radio show say that if they hadn't seen her and just heard her testify that they would have never known it was her. Said she doesn't even talk like that. Said they ported her to look and sound like a little innocent school girl. Mentioned her glasses were different to portray the image. Can't remember but said they were not sure she wore glasses but I can't be 100% on that. I wonder if some old pictures of her pre testimony to see if that's true.
Click to expand...
She did sound like a 13 year old. Of course, she writes like one too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
#10,581
#10,581
1972 Grad said:
I would walk out of a job interview like that one.
Click to expand...
He is hoping you will. He doesn't want you.

The mental gymnastics people will propose to prop up their partisan needs is scary.

If we dont need reasonable doubt about someone's character to deny them, then all you need to create is what we have here. Unfounded, unprovable accusations.

Depending how dirty a side wanted to play, we may never get another appointment.

This is nothing more than people who are cool with dirty politics making excuses for dirty politics from their side.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
#10,583
#10,583
evillawyer said:
Given that it is a job interview (and not a trial), that we're talking about a lifetime appointment to the most powerful court in the country, that the Court's legitimacy is absolutely tantamount (and certainly more important than the reputation of any one potential justice), and the difficulty of removing through impeachment a wrongly appointed justice, I would say your doubt doesn't even have to be "reasonable." For example, I think if you only believe there's a 20% chance Kavanaugh assaulted Ford, that may be sufficient to keep him off. Why take the risk when there are plenty in line without the cloud of suspicion that overhangs Kavanaugh?
Click to expand...
Have you been to many job interviews where you had to explain items in your high school yearbook?
 
#10,587
#10,587
InVOLuntary said:
I heard someone on a radio show say that if they hadn't seen her and just heard her testify that they would have never known it was her. Said she doesn't even talk like that. Said they ported her to look and sound like a little innocent school girl. Mentioned her glasses were different to portray the image. Can't remember but said they were not sure she wore glasses but I can't be 100% on that. I wonder if some old pictures of her pre testimony to see if that's true.
Click to expand...
Ironically, she deleted all social media accounts.
 
#10,590
#10,590
We were at the beach this week and I was subjected to listening to other people’s kids. A 15 year old boy and girl were taking turns trying to impress each other with cool stories. The boy said he went to a party and he remembers someone opening a bottle of gin and the next thing he remembers is waking up in a bathtub. I thought oh buddy there goes your political career.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Obsessed, InVOLuntary and NorthDallas40
#10,591
#10,591
Anyone listen to Graham's questioning of K during initial SC interviews? About his knowledge and beliefs per the difference between standard criminal law and military law? Whether we are at war since 9/11? About trying civilian traitors in military courts?

Per swamp draining... Is it possible that may be the real reason lots of people don't want him on the court? His beliefs on military tribunals? Not just roe v Wade?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1972 Grad
#10,597
#10,597
AirVol said:
Ironically, she deleted all social media accounts.
Click to expand...
I’ll bet the FBI can find them! Maybe they’ll stumble across Hills emails too!

And I’d like to send T&Ps to the agents family for upcoming self imposed demise of whatever agent that finds that social media data. Turrible turrible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AirVol
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top