Kavanaugh Confirmation

#10,627
#10,627
NorthDallas40 said:
It takes two bodies to seat a SCOTUS appointee. POTUS picks but Senate affirms. You moonbats started this whole **** show with Bork that evolved to where we are today. Blame yourselves.

You want to seat who you pick? Control both POTUS and the senate.
Click to expand...
Unless you have a Flake and 2 women on your side, and then it's in doubt. At least Dems stick together.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol
#10,628
#10,628
Chalk up another lie for lyin' Bart O'Kavanaugh. Looks like grandpappy was a Yale alum, making lil' Bart a legacy. So much for him having no connections to Yale, as he claimed.

 
#10,630
#10,630
1972 Grad said:
My desire for revenge isn't political. It is about right and wrong, and the politics of personal destruction. I don't want to see innocent people destroyed on either side. I don't want to punish the Dems next pick. I want to punish the people responsible for this lynching of a good man.
Click to expand...
If they don’t want to vote for him then don’t vote for him. But the blatant character assassination and destruction is punitative and should bear some damn retribution!
 
#10,633
#10,633
evillawyer said:
Given that it is a job interview (and not a trial), that we're talking about a lifetime appointment to the most powerful court in the country, that the Court's legitimacy is absolutely tantamount (and certainly more important than the reputation of any one potential justice), and the difficulty of removing through impeachment a wrongly appointed justice, I would say your doubt doesn't even have to be "reasonable." For example, I think if you only believe there's a 20% chance Kavanaugh assaulted Ford, that may be sufficient to keep him off. Why take the risk when there are plenty in line without the cloud of suspicion that overhangs Kavanaugh?
Click to expand...
What if there’s only a 19% chance?
 
#10,634
#10,634
luthervol said:
Again with the retaliation for a past wrong. Was it wrong to deny a vote on Garland? 10 fold, you say?
Click to expand...
Always thought it peculiar you scumbags did not protest further the vote on Garland. Thought u had it in the bag with the hag huh? In these circles, people voted for Trump for this very reason.
 
#10,639
#10,639
InVOLuntary said:
Your party is not voting for him regardless of the investigation. They could discover evidence that it was a total frame job and they will not vote for him so why the investigation? It's a total hack job and you know it. Your just too morally bankrupt to back track now.
Click to expand...
They possibly may be naive enough to think some republicans may vote against him if he is determined to be a poor candidate.
 
#10,643
#10,643
Orange_Crush said:
I don't know the story. Wanst paying attention. I wouldn't doubt that he was since the Rs are every bit as political and cut throat pigs as the Ds.

The thing is, unlike you, I think right is right, wrong is wrong, turnabout is never fair play, and the ends never justify the means.

I believed in being what you claim to want and not being what you claim to hate.

Click on my user name. Find my recent posts. Read where I've told the other conservatives in here the same thing about their revenge fantasies about this of late.

Even though you can't fathom it, I'm really not an amoral political hack like you.
Click to expand...
Do you also believe in confession and attempting to right a past wrong?
 
#10,645
#10,645
luthervol said:
They possibly may be naive enough to think some republicans may vote against him if he is determined to be a poor candidate.
Click to expand...
Keep justifying your moral depravity. Your should be embarrassed that your party s stooping to this level but all means try to justify it your mind.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol, 1972 Grad, Orange_Crush and 1 other person
#10,647
#10,647
1972 Grad said:
My desire for revenge isn't political. It is about right and wrong, and the politics of personal destruction. I don't want to see innocent people destroyed on either side. I don't want to punish the Dems next pick. I want to punish the people responsible for this lynching of a good man.
Click to expand...
and it was wrong to deny a vote on Garland.
 
#10,648
#10,648
luthervol said:
Do you also believe in confession and attempting to right a past wrong?
Click to expand...
I don't understand your question. If you're asking if I believe the ends to justify the means, I've already answered that. If you are asking if being wronged in the past means I get to be immoral now, I've already answered that.
 
#10,650
#10,650
luthervol said:
They possibly may be naive enough to think some republicans may vote against him if he is determined to be a poor candidate.
Click to expand...
Do you believe there is any possible outcome to the FBI investigation that would lead to any of the Democratic Committee members voting to confirm Kavanaugh?
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top