lawgator1
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2005
- Messages
- 72,899
- Likes
- 42,996
I'll play the Ginsberg rule...
20-30 years ago, Senators voted on the qualifications for the job rather than a political position. And that's a damning statement from BOTH sides of the aisle. Now, regardless of the information, less than 15 minutes after he was announced, your boy Chucky made the announcement they were going to oppose. No further information, no credential check, nothing. Just a flat "NO!" And you certainly can't blame the sexual assault allegations for that little turn of events.
Can you admit your party has made a farce of this nomination?
Yes.
They'd have a lot more credibility if they had not knee jerk said no in ten seconds.
Can you admit that blocking a vote in Garland was dirty pool, too?