Kavanaugh Confirmation

#12,853
#12,853
luthervol said:
Something as trivial as the meaning of boof and devil's triangle. Some of you are ready to celebrate the placement of man onto the Supreme Court who finds it acceptable to lie under oath when it's expedient and self-serving.
Click to expand...

This is what you're hanging your hopes of impeachment on?
 
#12,855
#12,855
luthervol said:
The fact that he would lie about something so trivial is even more worrisome.
Click to expand...
Which you don't know if he lied about it or not. Not surprising since you are completely ok with hanging a person for something without any evidence or corroboration if he is a republican.
 
#12,861
#12,861
volinbham said:
This is what you're hanging your hopes of impeachment on?
Click to expand...
Who said I have hopes of impeachment? He's a poor choice but I have no reason to believe Trump would ever make a better choice. We can have a known perjurer sit on the bench for the next 30 years......MAGA.
 
#12,862
#12,862
GAVol said:
They don't call him Luther the Boofer for nothing.
Click to expand...

Attaboy Boofer!

hqdefault.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1972 Grad and FLVOL69
#12,864
#12,864
luthervol said:
Who said I have hopes of impeachment? He's a poor choice but I have no reason to believe Trump would ever make a better choice. We can have a know perjurer sit on the bench for the next 30 years......MAGA.
Click to expand...

Do you read your own posts? You replied to an "impeachment for what?" post with a claim he lied under oath.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orange_Crush
#12,865
#12,865
luthervol said:
Who said I have hopes of impeachment? He's a poor choice but I have no reason to believe Trump would ever make a better choice. We can have a know perjurer sit on the bench for the next 30 years......MAGA.
Click to expand...
You struggle with fact. No matter how much you want about it or wish it to be true, he hasn't perjured **** lol
 
#12,867
#12,867
LouderVol said:
Congress doesn't launch one of these official investigations that Kavanaugh talks about, so its a moot point on what his opinion on official investigations is. They "review". calling impeachment an empty threat goes a long way to dismissing the whole system, again not something Kavanaugh even could weigh in on.

if the legislative can't be trusted who do we turn to. we already have justices, RBG, coming out and saying Trump should be removed regardless of any evidence put in front of her. so we can't trust the Judiciary already. Trump is obviously incompetent so we can't trust him. what else are we supposed to do?

There are measures in place. The Supreme Court doesn't even get involved in impeachment except the chief justice as the supervisor (I forget the official term). so your problem shouldn't be with Kavanaugh. the system as a whole should be your issue, you are just using Kavanaugh as a scapegoat.
Click to expand...
This totally ignores the context of the conversation, and I need to rehash some things.
1. In 2009, Kavanaugh wrote a law review article suggesting that legislation be passed exempting the president from civil and criminal investigation.

2. I was called intellectually dishonest for saying Kavanaugh opined that the president should be immune from prosecution.

3. The article basically says “well this would be a safe move because... impeachment.” A comment that I probably disregarded as toothless when I read it in August and missed when I skimmed it this morning, and I was well trolled over this mistake.

4. Impeachment is toothless. Impeachment without investigation is hopeless and toothless.

The discussion was only ever intended as a logical proof to show that Kavanaugh in fact believes that the president should effectively be immune from scrutiny for crimes. This is abundantly clear if you examine the article through the lens of our current political situation, the situation as it existed in 2009 when the article was written, and as it has existed since 1998 when the senate failed to remove Clinton. Criticisms of the system we have were made to provide context.

I don’t approve of any Supreme Court Justice who takes that position, for reasons that should be obvious by now.

His ability to directly affect Donald Trump is largely beside the point. I don’t care about Trump. His opinions and written work are the best measure of what he will be like as a Justice for possibly 40 years or more.
 
  • Like
Reactions: luthervol
#12,868
#12,868
volinbham said:
Do you read your own posts? You replied to an "impeachment for what?" post with a claim he lied under oath.
Click to expand...
Answering why he would be impeached does not equate to hoping he is impeached; even though I would be fine with impeachment. Sort of indifferent.
 
#12,873
#12,873
luthervol said:
Do you even have a best guess? Sure you do. You guys can't possibly be that gullible.
Click to expand...
Honestly had never used either term in my life. Even if I had, there's no way I'm putting stock in trying to interpret the notes page of a yearbook. It's absolutely asinine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RockyTop85
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top