SLICKYINC
Beef n cheddar
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2010
- Messages
- 22,532
- Likes
- 82,428
Not sure i get your point. This appointment has nothing to do with Roe v Wade. This was luberal idiocy regarding President Donald J Trump.Women's Rights:
I told my wife, who doesn't follow politics closely, that BK had been confirmed. She asked why the Ds made such punks of themselves over this. I said it would tip the balance of the court from liberal to conservative. The Ds are afraid Rowe Vs Wade will be overturned.
Her eyes brightened. You think it may?
It's not a woman's rights debate. It's a moral debate.
Their excuse to whip their base into a frenzy was R v W.Not sure i get your point. This appointment has nothing to do with Roe v Wade. This was luberal idiocy regarding President Donald J Trump.
Here's the disconnect. It's not really pro-abortion. It's pro-choice. It's about the government not controlling what a woman can do with her body. Pro-life folks seem to think they get together and have baby-killing parties or something.
Strangely, I can actually see the motivation of those rare individuals on the radical fringe (I think the vast majority of pro-life folks would condemn such actions). They think that by killing one they can save thousands. Don't think that legitimizes it, but I can understand how someone might get to that point. They might also consider themselves martyrs to the cause, knowing full well they'll go to prison.I think this is true. On the flip side, I've never understood the hypocrisy of those on the pro-life side that think it's okay to kill abortion doctors or bomb abortion clinics. It's like WTF??! Crazy people are everywhere.
No it’s about population control and mass genocide wrapped in the veil of woman’s rights.
We aren’t aborting rich kids.
We are wiping out the sector or population that our government doesn’t want to get truly educated and free of the Jim Crowe laws.
The woman’s right part is a bunch of lies. Just go google RBG own words on why she passed it. And it’s not a coincidence this law happened within 10 years of the Jim Crowe laws being dismantled.
Strangely, I can actually see the motivation of those rare individuals on the radical fringe (I think the vast majority of pro-life folks would condemn such actions). They think that by killing one they can save thousands. Don't think that legitimizes it, but I can understand how someone might get to that point. They might also consider themselves martyrs to the cause, knowing full well they'll go to prison.