Kavanaugh Confirmation

Dems, here is one of your leaders explaining how this works.

And it works because the press is a wing of the Dem party


They have no shame and the fact that a walking zombie like Pelosi could be the speaker again Is just Nuts . This is from the party that thinks Di Fi isn’t liberal enough to be backed by the DNC . Lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: Carl Pickens
Of course I'm going to be ideologically opposed to anyone Trump nominates. Gorsuch and K were equally ideologically unacceptable but Gorsuch was't a perjurer and probable sex offender. Gorsuch = okay. K = horrible pick.

You say probable like you have proof ... oh wait we just finished up that job interview and he got the job , NM
 
This was Hillary choices...
  • Chief Judge Merrick Garland (D.C. Cir.)
  • Judge Sri Srinivasan (D.C. Cir.)
  • Judge Jane Kelly (8th Cir.)
  • Judge Paul Watford (9th Cir.)
  • Judge Jacqueline Nguyen (9th Cir.)
  • Justice Goodwin Liu (California Supreme Court)
  • Justice Mariano-Florentino Cuéllar (California Supreme Court)
  • Judge Lucy H. Koh (N.D. Cal.)
  • Judge Patricia Millett (D.C. Cir.)
  • Senator Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.)
  • Senator Cory Booker (D.-N.J.)- LOL

Welp ...Booker is out since he admitted he’s an offender of women . Unless a Dem President gets elected then they will just say he was adjusting her shirt to help keep her modesty in tact . Lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol
You say probable like you have proof ... oh wait we just finished up that job interview and he got the job , NM
And many feel the pick was horrible because he is a perjurer and probable sex offender. We're in an endless loop here, the same as with Trump being the answer to politics as normal. That's like treating the flu with arsenic. (I guess it would make you completely forget about having the flu)
 
And many feel the pick was horrible because he is a perjurer and probable sex offender. We're in an endless loop here, the same as with Trump being the answer to politics as normal. That's like treating the flu with arsenic. (I guess it would make you completely forget about having the flu)
Morons. Morons feel this way. There is no proof.
 
And I guess only morons feel O.J. was guilty since he was found not guilty.
There’s evidence he killed those two. There’s no evidence of either of your K claims.

Have you seen the clip of Pelosi a while back? The one talking about the wrap-up smear? You’re the target audience for that. They prey on the stupid.
 
Last edited:
There’s evidence he killed those two. There’s no evidence of either of you K claims.

Have you seen the clip of Pelosi a while back? The one talking about the wrap-up smear? You’re the target audience for that. They prey on the stupid.
Sure there is. His college roommate heard him and his friends use the terms.
K and O.J. were both determined "not guilty" by those sitting in a position of official judgement. The court of public opinion may reach a different conclusion.
 
Sure there is. His college roommate heard him and his friends use the terms.
K and O.J. were both determined "not guilty" by those sitting in a position of official judgement. The court of public opinion may reach a different conclusion.

OJ cut the head of his wife with overwhelming evidence. Brett got accused of grabbing a boob 36 years ago.. big difference
 
OJ cut the head of his wife with overwhelming evidence. Brett got accused of grabbing a boob 36 years ago.. big difference
The similarity is they were both determined to be innocent even though many felt, and still feel, they were guilty.
 
Sure there is. His college roommate heard him and his friends use the terms.
K and O.J. were both determined "not guilty" by those sitting in a position of official judgement. The court of public opinion may reach a different conclusion.
Heresay. That’s your proof?

Also, K was never on trial. I’m not sure about this “not guilty” verdict your talking about.
 
Sure there is. His college roommate heard him and his friends use the terms.
K and O.J. were both determined "not guilty" by those sitting in a position of official judgement. The court of public opinion may reach a different conclusion.

Nope Nope and Nope ... no you don’t , you guys wanted a job interview because it’s not a trial . OJ was on trial . Ks was “ just an interview for a job” remember ? His employers felt he was qualified for said job , interview over , welcome to your new job mr K ...here is the key to the bathroom .
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orange_Crush
Of course I'm going to be ideologically opposed to anyone Trump nominates. Gorsuch and K were equally ideologically unacceptable but Gorsuch was't a perjurer and probable sex offender. Gorsuch = okay. K = horrible pick.

But it was okay if we had one as President. I'm curious why you guys don't give Juanita Brodderick the same benefit of doubt that you give Dr. Ford.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol
Of course I'm going to be ideologically opposed to anyone Trump nominates. Gorsuch and K were equally ideologically unacceptable but Gorsuch was't a perjurer and probable sex offender. Gorsuch = okay. K = horrible pick.
Kavanaugh is not a perjurer either by any rational and reasonable person’s logic
ABD19B01-720F-49DB-9D24-79593F79C70B.jpeg
 
Heresay. That’s your proof?

Also, K was never on trial. I’m not sure about this “not guilty” verdict your talking about.
Exactly. Guilt did not have to be proven. Millions of reasonable people think he is a perjurer and probable sex offender, yet the right gave him a lifetime appointment as a SCJ anyway.
 
26609b7445ecdf745c880152381cf0ab.jpg
 
Exactly. Guilt did not have to be proven. Millions of reasonable people think he is a perjurer and probable sex offender, yet the right gave him a lifetime appointment as a SCJ anyway.
So you believe the evidence against OJ as a multi killer is equal to the “evidence” that K might have touched a boob 36 years ago.....

We’re done here.
 

VN Store



Back
Top