BigorangeBoy
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2014
- Messages
- 2,808
- Likes
- 6,668
No, I mostly agree there, but I was referring to one of the 6 main contributors. An injury to any one of them could drastically alter our season, and two of those guys have had chronic injury issues, one of which is already feeling some ill-effects of his latest surgery (Turner).Obviously not ideal, but I don’t think an injury to Pember, Gaines or Johnson derails the season.
I agree. Also if Fulkerson ever gets hurt, we are going to be in a heap of trouble.No, I mostly agree there, but I was referring to one of the 6 main contributors. An injury to any one of them could drastically alter our season, and two of those guys have had chronic injury issues, one of which is already feeling some ill-effects of his latest surgery (Turner).
Agree about that partNo, I mostly agree there, but I was referring to one of the 6 main contributors. An injury to any one of them could drastically alter our season, and two of those guys have had chronic injury issues, one of which is already feeling some ill-effects of his latest surgery (Turner).
Agree about that part
Agree about that part
I have always wondered if adding a walk on guard who might not be an offensive stalwart, also not a defensive liability, but a great ball handler, passer and a good FT shooter is not possible to throw out there in clock burning press breaking situations to take the pressure off a team built like ours now.... sure seems like I used to see some candidates in intramurals. Was hoping that might be the role our latest addition is to fill, but not seeing that in stats or discussions....
Fleschman was first walk on off the bench last game, also has some experience under his belt, could be a possibility.I have always wondered if adding a walk on guard who might not be an offensive stalwart, also not a defensive liability, but a great ball handler, passer and a good FT shooter is not possible to throw out there in clock burning press breaking situations to take the pressure off a team built like ours now.... sure seems like I used to see some candidates in intramurals. Was hoping that might be the role our latest addition is to fill, but not seeing that in stats or discussions....
Fulky walking around holding his wrist last game had me a little concerned also.No, I mostly agree there, but I was referring to one of the 6 main contributors. An injury to any one of them could drastically alter our season, and two of those guys have had chronic injury issues, one of which is already feeling some ill-effects of his latest surgery (Turner).
Fleschman was first walk on off the bench last game, also has some experience under his belt, could be a possibility.
Fulky walking around holding his wrist last game had me a little concerned also.
So gassed there at one point he looked a little intoxicated. Chuckled a wee bit.
Tough as nails and leaves it all on the floor.He wasn't just holding it. He waved to the bench to be subbed out (they didn't see him). Based by the look on his face, he was in extreme pain. It was his surgically repaired right wrist. I thought it was a disaster. Then he literally shook it off and continued on to the offensive end after AL State took their 2 free throws.
I don't think strength will be a problem with Pember, he's thicker than he looks now. I was really impressed with his shot, he's smooth and plays at a good tempo. Anyone with that size, athleticism and shooting stroke has a chance to be a really good player. As for Fulky, let's get into conference play before we decide what type player he's going to be. I hope he can maintain it but feel like he's going to get exposed down the road.So we are comparing Fr. Fulky and Fr. Pember because they are both......? They are not even close to the same type of players. Fulky showed a lot of promise as a freshman because he was already "what he is" and that is a long bouncy high energy post player with no perimeter game. That's not that difficult to translate onto the court as a freshman. Pember is not that and doesn't appear that he will every be that. He is a developmental prospect. There is less certainty of what he will become. He has a rare combination of size, length, shooting ability, and feel for the game on the offensive end of the court. That is promising. But he is a long ways from that type of ceiling as a player. I would equate it to him having a ceiling of becoming one of those players that Gonzaga just always seems to have on their team. It's also unlikely her gets to that point any time soon. And he might never develop the strength and physicality and defense to get to that point.
Except that he came in in mop up the other night and pretty much filled it up.So we are comparing Fr. Fulky and Fr. Pember because they are both......? They are not even close to the same type of players. Fulky showed a lot of promise as a freshman because he was already "what he is" and that is a long bouncy high energy post player with no perimeter game. That's not that difficult to translate onto the court as a freshman. Pember is not that and doesn't appear that he will every be that. He is a developmental prospect. There is less certainty of what he will become. He has a rare combination of size, length, shooting ability, and feel for the game on the offensive end of the court. That is promising. But he is a long ways from that type of ceiling as a player. I would equate it to him having a ceiling of becoming one of those players that Gonzaga just always seems to have on their team. It's also unlikely her gets to that point any time soon. And he might never develop the strength and physicality and defense to get to that point.