VOLINVONORE
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2008
- Messages
- 16,927
- Likes
- 15,369
Agree. There's some huge differences. I think no huddle football is great and I'm not sure why more don't do it. As long as you can get your plays and players in, why wouldn't you try to go before the other team subs in their highly specialized defenses?Here is the thing. these comparisons to Heupel and American football are completely bogus.
It has happened/ worked in the men’s game several time….. Rick Pitino, Billy Donovan, Bruce Pearl( he played a 6’4” back up point guard at PF), Loyola Marymount…. The press doesn’t just cause turnovers…. It wears the other team out and gets them to take quicker shots than they are use too…. I look forward to watching it in action.Agree. There's a some huge differences. I think no huddle football is great and I'm not sure why more don't do it. As long as you can get your plays and players in, why wouldn't you try to go before the other team subs in their highly specialized defenses?
But the big difference btw "the system" in basketball is that in basketball you need the other team to cooperate a little more for it to work. You need them not to be able to break your press, you need them to turn the ball over, and you need them to give up boards.
Which is why many of us have said it won't work when you can't control tempo, which you often won't against better teams.
Yes, those same examples from across a few decades have been cited here several times. Never seen any from the women’s game though. We’ll see how it goesIt has happened/ worked in the men’s game several time….. Rick Pitino, Billy Donovan, Bruce Pearl( he played a 6’4” back up point guard at PF), Loyola Marymount…. The press doesn’t just cause turnovers…. It wears the other team out and gets them to take quicker shots than they are use too…. I look forward to watching it in action.
Kapinus went to Vandy and we’re making bets on whether Tess or Edie will get the most playing time. This is why I get cranky.
Man are we getting another commit 3 hrs ago you said we could have one at any momentWho is we?
You think that’s worse than worrying about a player that just committed to a team that Tennessee stomped a mud hole in this season where a player that was once sitting at the end of Tennessee’s bench is now a starter?
You specialize in taking any chance to crap on players of the same team you claim to support! I guess that makes you feel like somebody.
A L at its finest.
Definitely have good players no doubt. Both old and new. Just a bit short on reliable outside shooters besides Jewel and Sara, the rest are on the potential list. I just think one more will divert some defensive pressure off Jewel. She’s going to get Rickea type defensive attention now.I have to agree. Kim is going to have better shooters here she inherited on the roster than she had on Marshall. Some fans act like the cupboard was empty when Kim came in. We have some good players on the team.
Put the phone/keyboard down. Usually I look forward to comments from certain ppl because they are objectively viewed. However, you on this topic are becoming exhausting and the team hasn't played one minute of importance yet. Eat a snicker or something and relax.I’ve always said this season would be rough, no matter who was coach. I deluded myself the last two yrs bc at least we had a couple of elite players. Wasn’t enough.
Agree. There's a some huge differences. I think no huddle football is great and I'm not sure why more don't do it. As long as you can get your plays and players in, why wouldn't you try to go before the other team subs in their highly specialized defenses?
But the big difference btw "the system" in basketball is that in basketball you need the other team to cooperate a little more for it to work. You need them not to be able to break your press, you need them to turn the ball over, and you need them to give up boards.
Which is why many of us have said it won't work when you can't control tempo, which you often won't against better teams.
Put the phone/keyboard down. Usually I look forward to comments from certain ppl because they are objectively viewed. However, you on this topic are becoming exhausting and the team hasn't played one minute of importance yet. Eat a snicker or something and relax.
The biggest question with players currently on the team is how well will they respond to new coaching? None of us know that. For all we know, this new staff could help them improve greatly, or it could go the opposite direction. We'll have to wait and see what Coach Kim can get out of the players she has.Definitely have good players no doubt. Both old and new. Just a bit short on reliable outside shooters besides Jewel and Sara, the rest are on the potential list. I just think one more will divert some defensive pressure off Jewel. She’s going to get Rickea type defensive attention now.
I’m 50/50 on Tess. In one way she could be used as a closer of quarters and get up 3s… or more likely she will be playing a PF and in the corner. I don’t see her in extended minutes and that’s fine bc of CKCs philosophy.Tess will play a bunch this season, I have no feel for Edie’s ability, doubt anyone does yet. I think some will be surprised how useful Tess is in this new program.
I’m 50/50 on Tess. In one way she could be used as a closer of quarters and get up 3s… or more likely she will be playing a PF and in the corner. I don’t see her in extended minutes and that’s fine bc of CKCs philosophy.
Im not sold on her guard ability esp on D and it seems CKC is very defensive and athlete minded. Can Tess find a role? Yes. Will she buy into it? Idk? Can u change a 5th year?