Volfan2012
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2012
- Messages
- 34,412
- Likes
- 63,635
I can’t remember. Did Heupel recruit relatively well at UCF compared to other AAC schools? I remember there being some conversations about it on the Recruiting forum when he was hired. Maybe one of them can verify.Usually no coach is an elite recruiter until they get a job where they can become an elite recruiter.
Really can't use that though because it was against a team with a tremendous amount more talent playing on their homecourt. Kellie and the Lady vols blew out Green Bay and that coach has been well regarded for years. Sometimes the talent level just makes it impossible even though I can agree 41 is quite a walloping.And they were basically blown out by 41 points.
I get that but no one would be a head coach anywhere if that logic were pursued to it's conclusion because everyone has to start somewhere and progress up stay even or even go down in stature.There are not many in any profession who is hired as CEO in their 1st job.Look up Mark Campbell at Union’s record. He won at NAIA level and Division 2 level. Did we interview him? You’re right winning can carry to other levels for sure, but winning consistently at the D1 level is much harder. I said she could be the next greatest coach out there but there just isn’t that much to go off of on this level.
They won the regular season conference championship and tournament championship.Tbf she bullied a new conference by getting P5 transfer down players
How much was coaching and how much was skill gap?
They didn’t win the reg season did they or was it just a crazy OT conference championship game
We’d have to outbid by a lot in the beginning. What we offer in the first few years of recruiting can’t be comparable to SC, LSU, UConn, etc. until she gets established. If it is in the same ballpark, we’d again be swimming upstream compared to their history of success.All of it if you have enough of it. There are plenty of players that would play for Bugs Bunny for the right amount of compensation. It won't matter who we hire if she or he has that backup were headed for success.
Really can't use that though because it was against a team with a tremendous amount more talent playing on their homecourt. Kellie and the Lady vols blew out Green Bay and that coach has been well regarded for years. Sometimes the talent level just makes it impossible even though I can agree 41 is quite a walloping.
I remember people not being impressed with his recruiting even compared to other AAC schools.I can’t remember. Did Heupel recruit relatively well at UCF compared to other AAC schools? I remember there being some conversations about it on the Recruiting forum when he was hired. Maybe one of them can verify.
I guess you could look at how they recruited compared to other mid major schools like with Heupel at UCF. For Caldwell, we’d have to look at how she recruited compared to other D2 schools, which for that level does look promising.
That’s a good way of looking at it! Ha! I know my opinion isn’t going to hold sway in Danny’s decision one way or another. And you are exactly right that everyone has to start somewhere. Just in my own opinion which again doesn’t matter in the grand scheme of things, I would feel better about the hire if she had just a little more experience at this level.I get that but no one would be a head coach anywhere if that logic were pursued to it's conclusion because everyone has to start somewhere and progress up stay even or even go down in stature.There are not many in any profession who is hired as CEO in their 1st job.
But let me say this ......I am old ,set in my ways ,recalcitrant and often spout off what is on my mind without apology these days ......am 85 ........none of us know who AD White has interviewed nor have any idea at this point who he is going to hire . He has a record /trend of hiring those who have won and/or competed for championships so I will be content with whomever he hires because he and his family know basketball. Then in a few years if that person doesn't work out I will be on the train to go a different direction.....ha !
Our best bet is to get someone at a school that has two or three nice players that like that coach and transfer. Get them here along with two of the best portal additions and try to have a big winning season. That could help you get started on the right path to recruiting.We’d have to outbid by a lot in the beginning. What we offer in the first few years of recruiting can’t be comparable to SC, LSU, UConn, etc. until she gets established. If it is in the same ballpark, we’d again be swimming upstream compared to their history of success.
I don't want her specifically just saying it is not a fair a comparison of her ability with better players and having the homecourt advantage all going to the other team. She has two star players trying to compete with mostly five star players. Probably lost by to much, but it happens sometimes to a lot of teams.So you want a coach who lost by 41 points to a team that generally lost to teams we want Tennessee to beat. That doesn't make sense. Had the outcome of that game been a close buzzer beater loss - then that would prove a point - but on the biggest stage the Marshall coach looked terrible.
Yeah, I couldn’t remember if that was the case. I think him winning more and showing positive direction definitely helped him with recruiting here going into second season and now. Granted, Cornbread left us scorched earth. Would recruits take notice if the new coach doesn’t improve slightly on Kellie’s last year or does worse?I remember people not being impressed with his recruiting even compared to other AAC schools.
I would argue that she got something out of the players that the previous coach couldn't.
You don't base a hire on one individual result, especially a game where a team shot 24% from the field and 14% from three.So you want a coach who lost by 41 points to a team that generally lost to teams we want Tennessee to beat. That doesn't make sense. Had the outcome of that game been a close buzzer beater loss - then that would prove a point - but on the biggest stage the Marshall coach looked terrible.
It's sad how many losers pretend to have connections online.Sounds legit
She did beat Florida at their place this season was her best win. Won over Poppe who got the Clemson job. Won 27 games and lost big to Va TechIf we are going to end up with a mid-major coach, at least get one that was competitive against the best schools and use the NCAA as the judgment. That by the way is why Harper was fired. She was fired because she could only make the sweet 16 and some of you are okay with a coach who couldn't get past the first round. SMH
Actually, recruiting was the concern with him and his staff. He never landed a four star at UCF where they are surrounded by many. But it was UCF. The bigger issue is he brought much of his staff and they were not in on the type of 0layers TN needed and hampered by the “we are terrible cheaters” press conference, recruiting did not go well early at all. In this case, some big time recruiters would be key imo.I can’t remember. Did Heupel recruit relatively well at UCF compared to other AAC schools? I remember there being some conversations about it on the Recruiting forum when he was hired. Maybe one of them can verify.
I guess you could look at how they recruited compared to other mid major schools like with Heupel at UCF. For Caldwell, we’d have to look at how she recruited compared to other D2 schools, which for that level does look promising.
Just like Brooks who took the best Va Tech players with him to Kentucky.Would be nice if Dawn Staley did ride the same horse to Tennessee ? Ha ....dreams are nice ......Our best bet is to get someone at a school that has two or three nice players that like that coach and transfer. Get them here along with two of the best portal additions and try to have a big winning season. That could help you get started on the right path to recruiting.