Kyle Rittenhouse - The Truth in 11 Minutes

#2,526
#2,526
Even if he’s found not guilty, there’s likely to be civil cases brought against him, and he’s likely to go Nick Sandman on the media. He’s going to become very familiar with the inside of the courtroom for a long time to come.
 
#2,527
#2,527
Vol8188 said:
Do you feel the same about parents who take their kids to BLM protests in general?

That odd double standard is one I struggle to understand. So many people appear to defend looting and rioting while strongly opposing attempts to prevent looting and rioting.

I just can’t understand that. Wanting to stop looting and rioting is bad? Is it just a sustain for private property in general?
Click to expand...
You know the answers to all these questions already. The double standard isn't a double standard to our hateful leftist friends posting in here. They're blackhearts, and it comes through in how they post.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol8188 and hog88
#2,528
#2,528
Vol8188 said:
Do you feel the same about parents who take their kids to BLM protests in general?

That odd double standard is one I struggle to understand. So many people appear to defend looting and rioting while strongly opposing attempts to prevent looting and rioting.

I just can’t understand that. Wanting to stop looting and rioting is bad? Is it just a sustain for private property in general?
Click to expand...
Not if you're a cop. When you're a 17 year old high school dropout, you should concentrate on getting a GED, and leave crowd control and disbursement up to the trained professionals.
 
#2,529
#2,529
VolStrom said:
I sincerely hope that if the proper judgment is announced and the space cadets decide to try and burn down the city again that the National Guard and police treat them for what they are, criminals.
Click to expand...


I don't get the sense that significant protests, much less riots, are likely either way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BowlBrother85
#2,530
#2,530
Madscientistvol said:
Even if he’s found not guilty, there’s likely to be civil cases brought against him, and he’s likely to go Nick Sandman on the media. He’s going to become very familiar with the inside of the courtroom for a long time to come.
Click to expand...

I highly doubt he has much of a case against any media outlets or "journalists". You are correct about him facing civil suits, I expect him and his parents (since he was a minor) to be broken by them. Even if found not guilty he's not looking at a very bright future.
 
#2,533
#2,533
BowlBrother85 said:
Not if you're a cop. When you're a 17 year old high school dropout, you should concentrate on getting a GED, and leave crowd control and disbursement up to the trained professionals.
Click to expand...

While I wholeheartedly agree that KR shouldn't have been there I find the bold funny coming from you. I'd bet if we went into the G Floyd threads we could find several of your posts calling the police something entirely different.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MG1968 and W.TN.Orange Blood
#2,535
#2,535
Vol8188 said:
Do you feel the same about parents who take their kids to BLM protests in general?

That odd double standard is one I struggle to understand. So many people appear to defend looting and rioting while strongly opposing attempts to prevent looting and rioting.

I just can’t understand that. Wanting to stop looting and rioting is bad? Is it just a sustain for private property in general?
Click to expand...


I don't know who you are talking about.

I think any person who engages in property destruction or otherwise converts a protest into a riot with losses should be held criminally accountable for their acts and the losses they cause, just as he should be held accountable for his.

Taking a kid to a protest send teaching them about civil discourse and protecting is fine. But of there's rioting and you have your kid there and are promoting that, I think that's awful too and should result in some form of sanction.

Pay attention. I am NOT justifying or excusing rioting. I don't know anyone here who has.

But I also think this young man's decisions to play guardsman for a day was fraught with the risk that materialized and two people are dead because of it. That has to be remedied.
 
#2,536
#2,536
Madscientistvol said:
Even if he’s found not guilty, there’s likely to be civil cases brought against him, and he’s likely to go Nick Sandman on the media. He’s going to become very familiar with the inside of the courtroom for a long time to come.
Click to expand...
I suppose that anyone can file a civil lawsuit against anyone, but what does Rittenhouse have to fear if he's found not guilty?
 
  • Like
Reactions: walkenvol and MemphisVol77
#2,537
#2,537
hog88 said:
While I wholeheartedly agree that KR shouldn't have been there I find the bold funny coming from you. I'd bet if we went into the G Floyd threads we could find several of your posts calling the police something entirely different.
Click to expand...
You would find me calling Derek Chauvin poorly trained... he is one officer.
 
#2,538
#2,538
VolStrom said:
I suppose that anyone can file a civil lawsuit against anyone, but what does Rittenhouse have to fear if he's found not guilty?
Click to expand...

He will face several wrongful death lawsuits and probably several others for whatever an LG type lawyer can make up. He and his parents will be financially ruined by legal bills at best.
 
#2,539
#2,539
lawgator1 said:
I don't know who you are talking about.

I think any person who engages in property destruction or otherwise converts a protest into a riot with losses should be held criminally accountable for their acts and the losses they cause, just as he should be held accountable for his.

Taking a kid to a protest send teaching them about civil discourse and protecting is fine. But of there's rioting and you have your kid there and are promoting that, I think that's awful too and should result in some form of sanction.

Pay attention. I am NOT justifying or excusing rioting. I don't know anyone here who has.

But I also think this young man's decisions to play guardsman for a day was fraught with the risk that materialized and two people are dead because of it. That has to be remedied.
Click to expand...
Isn't that what they're doing right now? I mean, he has been charged with murder, doesn't that remedy the deaths?
 
#2,540
#2,540
BowlBrother85 said:
That is typical right-wing alarmism.... but after January 6th, I'm glad to see that riots are a bad thing again.
Click to expand...
Ah yes, I remember when the US Capitol Building burned down and mass destruction and death reigned after police let the "rioters" in.

Like I said, lay off the sauce. It's very sad to want to defend useless politicians and literal pedophiles.
 
#2,542
#2,542
BowlBrother85 said:
Not if you're a cop. When you're a 17 year old high school dropout, you should concentrate on getting a GED, and leave crowd control and disbursement up to the trained professionals.
Click to expand...
You mean the same group that were told to stand down and watch blocks burn to the ground and people killed and maimed. Livelihoods destroyed. Civil liberties infringed on........ They neglected to do their job, when there is a void guess what happens?
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood
#2,543
#2,543
lawgator1 said:
I don't know who you are talking about.

I think any person who engages in property destruction or otherwise converts a protest into a riot with losses should be held criminally accountable for their acts and the losses they cause, just as he should be held accountable for his.

Taking a kid to a protest send teaching them about civil discourse and protecting is fine. But of there's rioting and you have your kid there and are promoting that, I think that's awful too and should result in some form of sanction.

Pay attention. I am NOT justifying or excusing rioting. I don't know anyone here who has.

But I also think this young man's decisions to play guardsman for a day was fraught with the risk that materialized and two people are dead because of it. That has to be remedied.
Click to expand...
Big stretch to call a convicted pedophile dropping n-bombs and telling people he'd tear out the hearts and a multiple-convicted woman beater "people", but you do you.
 
#2,544
#2,544
ButchPlz said:
Ah yes, I remember when the US Capitol Building burned down and mass destruction and death reigned after police let the "rioters" in.

Like I said, lay off the sauce. It's very sad to want to defend useless politicians and literal pedophiles.
Click to expand...
Where did I defend anyone? Let alone "literal pedophiles". That was a bizarre thing to say, and uncalled for based on anything that I have posted.
 
#2,545
#2,545
BowlBrother85 said:
Where did I defend anyone? Let alone "literal pedophiles". That was a bizarre thing to say, and uncalled for based on anything that I have posted.
Click to expand...
It's not bizarre. You're in here crucifying a kid when you, now, should have had plenty of time to watch the trial. You're bringing up a totally irrelevant "riot", you're standing up in defense of the protestors... it's not so hard to extrapolate out that you toe the party line in defense of pedophiles, woman abusers, and rotten political elites, all of whom I assume you see as "victims" of Rittenhouse and people like him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood
#2,546
#2,546
VolStrom said:
I suppose that anyone can file a civil lawsuit against anyone, but what does Rittenhouse have to fear if he's found not guilty?
Click to expand...
OJ was found liable in the civil suit brought against him for example. Not guilty in the criminal case doesn’t auto grant immunity in civil and the threshold of evidence is lower in civil.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hog88
#2,547
#2,547
BowlBrother85 said:
I'm pretty sure that he will need at least a high school diploma for that. Kyle Rittenhouse is a high school dropout, and wannabe cop, who was recently rejected by the Marine corps..

It's funny how some of you are making this kid out to be Wally Cleaver. Normal teenagers don't brandish lethal weaponry in the streets during a riot, as he was filmed doing. He was not a law enforcement officer, a security guard, an EMT, or a member of the fire department. His actions were that of a vigilante.
Click to expand...

No way I let my kid go into something like that. That said, it wasn’t a protest either. It was a full blown, destructive riot. So on the flip side we can agree that based what we saw in all of 2020, sure as s*** the police weren’t going to stop anything. The left just wants to explain away all the riots, looting and destruction and pass it off as peaceful protests. Now maybe people will think twice if they believe there’s a chance they get their ass shot off for destroying property and businesses of people that have nothing to do with George Floyd or any other SJ issue. Protest all you want, but leave people and their s*** alone.
 
#2,548
#2,548
Madscientistvol said:
OJ was found liable in the civil suit brought against him for example. Not guilty in the criminal case doesn’t auto grant immunity in civil and the threshold of evidence is lower in civil.
Click to expand...
The kid doesn't have a pot to piss in. Do you remember how much money you had when you were 17?
 
#2,549
#2,549
BowlBrother85 said:
Not if you're a cop. When you're a 17 year old high school dropout, you should concentrate on getting a GED, and leave crowd control and disbursement up to the trained professionals.
Click to expand...
So had he completed his HS education he would have been qualified to assist here? Good to know. Stay in school, kids.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hog88 and ButchPlz
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top