Kyle Rittenhouse - The Truth in 11 Minutes

#2,556
#2,556
hog88 said:
Doesn't matter, he'll be paying legal fees or judgments against him for the rest of his life.
Click to expand...
I'm not so sure that you can get a legal judgement against a minor that follows him throughout his life. On the other hand, IDGAF either since he's not mine to worry about.
 
#2,559
#2,559
ButchPlz said:
It's not bizarre. You're in here crucifying a kid when you, now, should have had plenty of time to watch the trial. You're bringing up a totally irrelevant "riot", you're standing up in defense of the protestors... it's not so hard to extrapolate out that you toe the party line in defense of pedophiles, woman abusers, and rotten political elites, all of whom I assume you see as "victims" of Rittenhouse and people like him.
Click to expand...
I haven't defended anyone, but Rittenhouse. That is an outright lie. I have said in multiple posts, that even vigilantes have the right to defend themselves when someone points a gun at them. Based on the evidence brought forth in this case. I think Kyle Rittenhouse should be acquitted. He still shouldn't have been there in the first place.
 
#2,560
#2,560
BowlBrother85 said:
Not if you're a cop. When you're a 17 year old high school dropout, you should concentrate on getting a GED, and leave crowd control and disbursement up to the trained professionals.
Click to expand...

The people who weren’t controlling crowds. Let’s make sure we are on the same page here. The police were not controlling the crowds. Therefore private citizens had to get involved.

Why do you see that as bad? Isn’t the real problem the people doing the looting and rioting? Like the first guy shot
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood
#2,561
#2,561
BowlBrother85 said:
Did I say that? No... someone posted that he was considering becoming a nurse. He should finish high school, or obtain a GED.
Click to expand...
Not here you were not. Specifically talking about police action and “trained professionals”

Not if you’re a cop. When you're a 17 year old high school dropout, you should concentrate on getting a GED, and leave crowd control and disbursement up to the trained professionals.
Click to expand...

I know you originally dropped the “high school dropout” tag when discussing nursing.
 
#2,563
#2,563
lawgator1 said:
I don't know who you are talking about.

I think any person who engages in property destruction or otherwise converts a protest into a riot with losses should be held criminally accountable for their acts and the losses they cause, just as he should be held accountable for his.

Taking a kid to a protest send teaching them about civil discourse and protecting is fine. But of there's rioting and you have your kid there and are promoting that, I think that's awful too and should result in some form of sanction.

Pay attention. I am NOT justifying or excusing rioting. I don't know anyone here who has.

But I also think this young man's decisions to play guardsman for a day was fraught with the risk that materialized and two people are dead because of it. That has to be remedied.
Click to expand...

Are two people dead because he “decided to play guardsman?” Or because he defended his life from insane people?

None of his actions that lead to the shooting involved him guarding a building. Instead a man with a violent history, who was was actively rioting according to both the defense and the prosecution, who told Rittenhouse he would kill him, chased him, and reached for his gun, while another man chasing Rittenhouse was shooting in the air.

To say they died because Rittenhouse wanted to defend private property is blatantly ignoring the facts. They died because they attacked an armed man who was attempting to run away from them. That sentence isn’t even debatable
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10nacvols, DynaLo, MemphisVol77 and 3 others
#2,564
#2,564
Vol8188 said:
The people who weren’t controlling crowds. Let’s make sure we are on the same page here. The police were not controlling the crowds. Therefore private citizens had to get involved.

Why do you see that as bad? Isn’t the real problem the people doing the looting and rioting? Like the first guy shot
Click to expand...
They are the focal problem, but vigilantism is not the answer. It will cause more problems than it will prevent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OL SMOKEY
#2,565
#2,565
BowlBrother85 said:
They are the focal problem, but vigilantism is not the answer. It will cause more problems than it will prevent.
Click to expand...
Then stand up with the rest of us and demand they do their jobs, call in the national gaurd and shut down violent protests before people, property and livelihoods are destroyed. If they do their jobs this never happens.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NCFisher, Zues1 and BowlBrother85
#2,566
#2,566
JOEY'S ALL VOL !!! said:
They are a pitiful lot aren’t they. It would be funny if it weren’t so sad, almost makes one feel sorry for them with the staggering amount of dumbassary they display ... almost.
Click to expand...
Each and every one of them- including the ones posting here- has directly or indirectly wished ill fortune on those who disagree.
 
#2,567
#2,567
KB5252 said:
Then stand up with the rest of us and demand they do their jobs, call in the national gaurd and shut down violent protests before people, property and livelihoods are destroyed. If they do their jobs this never happens.
Click to expand...
No, the answer is to defund the police and demand people let their **** be destroyed in the name of "justice".
 
  • Like
Reactions: NCFisher
#2,568
#2,568
BowlBrother85 said:
They are the focal problem, but vigilantism is not the answer. It will cause more problems than it will prevent.
Click to expand...

I have no opposition to protecting property. Idk now anyone could. Especially when the police force is either overwhelmed or being told to stand down for political reasons.

Even so this case really isn’t about vigilantism because it’s unrelated to why he acted. It’s famous because the media seems to support looting/rioting and openly opposes private property.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ButchPlz and W.TN.Orange Blood
#2,569
#2,569
The way the deliberation is going it appears there is not consensus among the jurors. IMO they are asking for the instructions to illustrate their points in the particulars of law. I'm not sure they come to verdict here, that surprises me.
 
#2,571
#2,571
KB5252 said:
The way the deliberation is going it appears there is not consensus among the jurors. IMO they are asking for the instructions to illustrate their points in the particulars of law. I'm not sure they come to verdict here, that surprises me.
Click to expand...

Asking for instructions may be to just make sure they are being thorough. May not be an indication of consensus or lack thereof. I presume they know the world is watching so they want to get it right.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KB5252
#2,574
#2,574
BowlBrother85 said:
They are the focal problem, but vigilantism is not the answer. It will cause more problems than it will prevent.
Click to expand...

Let's say that's true. When there is burning and looting and general rioting what are you suggesting be done? Having bad things happen and pointing out what you say shouldn't be done to address the problem isn't particularly helpful.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol8188
#2,575
#2,575
Franklin Pierce said:
EXCLUSIVE: 'Binger was set up for failure!' Kenosha DA knew the case against Kyle Rittenhouse was a losing proposition and passed the buck to Thomas Binger whose presentation has been marked with missteps and clashes with the judge

The choice of prosecutor for Kyle Rittenhouse's murder case could be a precise pointer as to how little confidence the County District Attorney had in securing a conviction.

Mike Graveley, the Kenosha County DA would normally have taken the case himself, but instead handed it down to prosecutor Thomas Binger, whose presentation of the case in Wisconsin has been marked with missteps and clashes with Judge Bruce Schroeder.

'Binger was set up for failure,' one Kenosha legal insider told Dailymail.com. 'Graveley is the superstar and he knew this one was sure to tarnish it.'

According to conservative outlet Milwaukee Right Now, Graveley 'pawned the case off to his unfortunate assistant district attorney, Thomas Binger, who was left to spin gold out of a pile of self-defense straw.'

Now court observers believe that even if Rittenhouse is found guilty, Binger's performance has given him good grounds for appeal.

Kenosha DA knew Rittenhouse case was a losing proposition and passed to Thomas Binger | Daily Mail Online
e0dd2acd3574679864cd76965aa5dce2.png
Click to expand...
National coverage case… asst DA. Losing proposition. If I was Binger I’d be mad.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top