Kyle Rittenhouse - The Truth in 11 Minutes

[txbo]

The elephant in the room is if it doesn't fit the narrative they have no interest in knowing, or even worse, absolutely know the facts and absolutely don't care.

A capital murder trial shouldn’t even be considered a political issue. It’s very sad.

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

What's the difference between LeBron James and Kyle Rittenhouse? Kyle doesn't miss his shots when under pressure.

Consider this stolen.

 

[volinbham]

And there it is

more erosion of faith in our institutions.

If government institutions (Justice) are corrupt (eg. the court decision in Kenosha is corrupt) then why on earth would Dems support giving them more power?

 

[AshG]

If you want me to believe the wrong verdict was reached, you're going to have to demonstrate judicial malpractice on behalf of the judge, a poorly formed written opinion by the judge, evidence of jury tampering, legal malpractice on behalf of either the defense or prosecution, etc. Give me something substantial beyond feelings.

I don't like that Rittenhouse was involved, I believe he should have stayed out of the area unless actually credentialed by the LEA on duty, but from what I can tell the appropriate verdict was carried out based on available evidence. Feelings are good, but sometimes they need to be turned off.

 

[hndog609]

And there it is

I find myself doubting this person is familiar enough with the case to realize that bringing genuine, widespread scrutiny might not go well at all for them. Keep people ignorant and continue making up ish would actually be the better plan. (for them anyway)

 

[hndog609]

A capital murder trial shouldn’t even be considered a political issue. It’s very sad.

I wish it was just sad. We're heading in the direction of "dangerous".

 

[midnight orange]

I’m not saying he’ll be convicted in Civil Court, just that it’s a much lower bar.

The jury could rule that Grosskeurtz (for example) was 49% in the wrong, and Rittenhouse was 51% in the wrong - and under the preponderance of the evidence threshold Rittenhouse would be liable.

Grosskeutz was a criminal perpetrator. Kyle was the victim. Crazier things have happened but I think it’s a stretch that the criminals will sue and win a judgement against the victim.

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

Consider this stolen.

I'm surprised you didn't steal the meme I posted the other day that says the same.

 

[volinbham]

And now Brandon has joined the fray - he started out fine but then someone wrote a statement for him.


Biden originally spoke to reporters shortly after a jury found Rittenhouse not guilty on all five criminal counts.

“I stand by what the jury has concluded,” Biden said outside of the White House. “The jury system works, and we have to abide by it,” the president said.


Shortly afterward, the White House issued a written statement by Biden.


“While the verdict in Kenosha will leave many Americans feeling angry and concerned, myself included, we must acknowledge that the jury has spoken,” Biden said.

So the POTUS is angry about the verdict. What a world.

 

[Vol8188]

The other 98% is the best page on Facebook. If you think Q people are dumb, just check out this page.

 

[RikidyBones]

And now Brandon has joined the fray - he started out fine but then someone wrote a statement for him.


Biden originally spoke to reporters shortly after a jury found Rittenhouse not guilty on all five criminal counts.

“I stand by what the jury has concluded,” Biden said outside of the White House. “The jury system works, and we have to abide by it,” the president said.


Shortly afterward, the White House issued a written statement by Biden.


“While the verdict in Kenosha will leave many Americans feeling angry and concerned, myself included, we must acknowledge that the jury has spoken,” Biden said.

So the POTUS is angry about the verdict. What a world.

Yeah that's not a great comment.

 

[Vol8188]

If you want me to believe the wrong verdict was reached, you're going to have to demonstrate judicial malpractice on behalf of the judge, a poorly formed written opinion by the judge, evidence of jury tampering, legal malpractice on behalf of either the defense or prosecution, etc. Give me something substantial beyond feelings.

I don't like that Rittenhouse was involved, I believe he should have stayed out of the area unless actually credentialed by the LEA on duty, but from what I can tell the appropriate verdict was carried out based on available evidence. Feelings are good, but sometimes they need to be turned off.

Or how about any facts whatsoever that point to guilt. That’s the real issue here. They had zero facts to support their position so they leaned on “judge bad” or “white supremacy”

 

[85SugarVol]

He h


He has the hardest to win case of any of them. He approached Rittenhouse on video with a loaded weapon, he raised his hands in the air, so Rittenhouse didn’t fire and stepped back. Then he points his weapon at Rittenhouse and gets shot in the arm that’s holding the gun and nowhere else. No other shots.

What evidence would possibly be in his favor?

I thought he was clearly not guilty of murder. Most were in agreement from the Criminal side.
And I’m not trying to argue that he should be found liable in Civil court. Just that it’s a lower bar.

Sub one of the other knuckleheads for Grosskeurtz, it matters not.
>50% remains the threshold - much more in play than “beyond a reasonable doubt”.

 

[txbo]

I wish it was just sad. We're heading in the direction of "dangerous".

After the trial, Kyle's attorney said that he wasn't defending a cause. He was defendind his client. Many, many wanted the outcome of this case to be about a cause with no regard to the defendant's fate on one side or the pain of the dead men's families on the other side.

 

[Electric Orange]

2 more weeks...

Keep hope alive... LOL

 

[Carl Pickens]

Here’s a great example of the liberal mentality
TikTok

 

[Vol8188]

I thought he was clearly not guilty of murder. Most were in agreement from the Criminal side.
And I’m not trying to argue that he should be found liable in Civil court. Just that it’s a lower bar.

Sub one of the other knuckleheads for Grosskeurtz, it matters not.
>50% remains the threshold - much more in play than “beyond a reasonable doubt”.

You would still require some evidence. Seriously, what do they have? Am I missing something?

 

[FLVOL_79]

What's the difference between LeBron James and Kyle Rittenhouse? Kyle doesn't miss his shots when under pressure.

 

[lawgator1]

Kenosha is a small town, less than 100k people. He worked there, he dad lived there, so yes I would call it his neighborhood. You wouldn’t?

No, in this context the only thing that would justify his waking around armed would be an imminent threat on people in his home.

Once we start having people making their own judgments about when they are justified in intervening like this, well, just think about that door and how widely you really want it opened.

 

[Franklin Pierce]

Biden calls for calm but says Rittenhouse 'not guilty' verdict leaves him 'angry and concerned'

 

[Vol8188]

Their neighborhoods? I was under the impression he was not in his neighborhood.

Because the media focused on his mother. He father lived in Kenosha and he spent a lot of his time in Kenosha.

 

[McDad]

The boy should be convicted and spend 10+ years in prison. This was no "self defense".

You made the right decision to stop posting here.

 

[McDad]

He shot and killed a man - fired 3 shots - then ran away. A group of good samaritans ID'd him as the shooter and tried to legally detain him.

Section 75 of the Criminal Procedure Law (Enforcement Powers – Arrest) of 1996 allows anyone to detain a person who is witnessed carrying out certain suspected crimes. ... A person using these detention powers may use reasonable force if their request is not met as long as they do not cause the suspect bruising.

Rittenhouse then shot several citizens attempting to detain him legally.

He must be convicted and serve time.

Oof.

 

[Vol8188]

No, in this context the only thing that would justify his waking around armed would be an imminent threat on people in his home.

Once we start having people making their own judgments about when they are justified in intervening like this, well, just think about that door and how widely you really want it opened.

ummmm…people can only carry in their home? That’s not how this works. But it’s cool, keep supporting the policies white supremacy.

And yes, I agree with the second part. We can’t have people trying to intervene like this and take the law into their own hands. That’s why I do not condone the actions of any of the three men who attacked Rittenhouse when he had fallen to the ground.

 

[txbo]

No, in this context the only thing that would justify his waking around armed would be an imminent threat on people in his home.

Once we start having people making their own judgments about when they are justified in intervening like this, well, just think about that door and how widely you really want it opened.

No one ever has to justify their legal activities in the United States of America.