C1500
You're the ketchup to my mustard.
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2014
- Messages
- 1,849
- Likes
- 3,609
That very well could be true. However, if that attorney doesn’t know for a fact that he has hired competent legal cousel to handle any civil actions (and such counsel would be attending the interview), then he should STRONGLY advise him not to speak to anyone without such legal counsel present.Maybe I am wrong on this, but I though the interview I seen with Richards when ask about bringing any other lawsuits he said he was a defense attorney and would not be working with them and had a trial in 3 days.
I took it that after today he wouldn't be his counsel. I could have misunderstood though, we had a lot of noise at work today.
Hopefully you saved that nugget for after the funeral.
That very well could be true. However, if that attorney doesn’t know for a fact that he has hired competent legal cousel to handle any civil actions (and such counsel would be attending the interview), then he should STRONGLY advise him not to speak to anyone without such legal counsel present.
Got to respect the jury's decision and there is nothing to be done about the past.
I do sincerely hope this does not embolden others to do what Rittenhouse did in the future. Just asking for trouble.
Oh the great place that is Twitter.
View attachment 413142
View attachment 413143
View attachment 413144
View attachment 413145
I always thought of the death penalty being a deterrent but after watching real crime shows and how they can manipulate confessions...even to the point of lying about evidence its changed my opinions...don't be poor white "trash" or a minority when some locales need to quiet the community and take down a wanted poster...once they get someone then the search for other suspects end...and I'm generally pro policeIf you watched the KR trial you should be against the death penalty. corrupt prosecutors kill innocent people.