Kyle Rittenhouse - The Truth in 11 Minutes

Thanks for the answer.
My opinion: 5/95, and I'm being generous.

We're talking about a nut who was so emotionally invested that he drove to the protest with a loaded gun.
There is no way in hell he wasn't fully aware of the meaning of that sign.
I'm sure he visited all of those right-wing nut sites.
Lol you are so mad. It’s hilarious yet again your emotions make you think illogically. But then again you actually thought he broke the law
 
Thanks for the answer.
My opinion: 5/95, and I'm being generous.

We're talking about a nut who was so emotionally invested that he drove to the protest with a loaded gun.
There is no way in hell he wasn't fully aware of the meaning of that sign.
I'm sure he visited all of those right-wing nut sites.
Were the people there to protest also "nuts"? KR had as much right to be there as the protesters. His freedom is the same as their freedom. It doesn't hinge on whether you or anyone else agrees with his beliefs. Let's pretend for one moment that KR is a "white supremacist". So what? While I strongly disagree with those beliefs, he has the right to believe as he believes.

Just going on what I've read, the FBI tapes clearly show that KR did not initiate the violence. The fact he needed to defend himself suggests he wasn't wrong to be armed. Could he have just "not been there"? Sure. So could the people who attacked him. You seem to totally ignore that.
 
Democrats look foolish complaining about the verdict. It's ridiculous. They're fomenting increased division with their rhetoric. They have the right to feel as they do, but as elected officials, they also have the responsibility to respect the law. This should never have been made political.
 
Huber’s trashy girlfriend defending the felonious domestic violent perp was especially laughable.
Apparently some GF like to get their ass kicked. They keep going back to the same situation with the abuser or the next abuser.
It happens a lot.
 
What you and your boys don’t understand is the right dont see black or white. They only see wrong or right. I understand you wanted the little white boy convicted but that didn’t make him wrong and the color of his skin would not have changed that. You guys are just looking for a reason. Had the AGGRESSORS been black, BLM would pushed that narrative that he shot them because of that one factor. But because they weren’t, you spin it racial simply because it was a BLM riot.

If you hypocrites just want a reason, here’s one and let me say this as clear as I possibly can. WE DONT LIKE DOMESTIC TERRORIST. Relay the word to grow some balls and bring the riot to the country.
 
The whole chain of events was set off by the first man. There is a very real argument that the two other men shot honestly thought they were confronting an "active shooter" and had no idea of KR's intentions, which the footage shows was self-defense. I don't remember all the names, but IIRC, the first man to attack KR and be shot had recently been released from the hospital after a suicide attempt. It's not a huge leap in logic to say he may have still been suicidal and that's why he engaged in the events that kicked off the shootings. Why else attack a man with a gun who has done nothing to provoke it? Simply having a gun is not provocation. After those first shots, you have a melee situation. People are yelling, probably running, lots of confusion. So it's very possible the other two that were shot thought they were doing something noble. But KR is under no obligation to allow himself to be beat down or hurt, even if their intentions were good. It seems to me, and this is JMO, the real culpable party was the first man to attack KR. But he's dead, so he can't really be held responsible.
 
I did not follow this trial. Does anyone know if there was testimony about who the people who got shot were, where they came from, how they got to WI, were they part of a group, what was their funding source, etc.?
 
Still a very disturbing narrative being pushed by the left. Because someone is carrying a pistol/rifle that means they want to shoot someone.

"He wouldn't have been armed if he didn't want to shoot someone"
"It can't be self defense if you have a gun with you"

And the media in general continuing to say mistruths as fact. Still hearing incorrect statements on the tv and reading them on msm websites about who was shot, how things progressed, and what actions were taken by all parties involved.
 
Democrats look foolish complaining about the verdict. It's ridiculous. They're fomenting increased division with their rhetoric. They have the right to feel as they do, but as elected officials, they also have the responsibility to respect the law. This should never have been made political.

A guilty verdict was never about Kyle. It was always about guns and self defense and striking fear into those that carry firearms. Just like their J6 crap isn’t about any insurrection. That’s all about scaring the right to keep them from protesting anything.
 

VN Store



Back
Top