Kyle Rittenhouse - The Truth in 11 Minutes

[Vol8188]

I looked for comments by both that supported the riots and found nothing. Maybe you can link a couple.
If they supported the rioters, then I disagree with them.
If they didn't but you think they did........that's just more proof of how you guys have been brainwashed.

Are you doubting my claims? Here’s Cuomo specifically saying protests do not have to be peaceful. Idk how you are unaware of this clip.

Nolte: Watch CNN's Chris Cuomo Encourage More Riots in Democrat-Run Cities

 

[luthervol]

The difference between hurricane damage and riot damage is one is preventable.

I'm not supporting riots. Never have.
What I have said is arrest and prosecute any and all of them.
I'm only giving you guys some much needed perspective.
The whole right wing bs of a summer of riots and cities burning with massive destruction is total crap.

 

[Vol8188]

If he was trying to stop what he thought to be an active shooter, then more power to him. Don't really know the story of the guy.
But carrying with an expired permit kind of makes him a dumbass gun nut in my opinion.

How can you be an active shooter if you didn’t shoot anyone until they hit you with a skateboard and tried to take your gun?

You realize to be an “active shooter” you’d need to be actively shooting right? Not just, someone attacks you, you shoot them and then stop. That’s not an active shooter

 

[luthervol]

Are you doubting my claims? Here’s Cuomo specifically saying protests do not have to be peaceful. Idk how you are unaware of this clip.

Nolte: Watch CNN's Chris Cuomo Encourage More Riots in Democrat-Run Cities

I would have loved to seen the rest of the comment. Brietbart conveniently cut it off after he said peaceful.
If he supports rioters (which he in no way does), then he is an idiot.
If you believe he supports rioters (which he in no way does), then you have been brainwashed.

 

[luthervol]

How can you be an active shooter if you didn’t shoot anyone until they hit you with a skateboard and tried to take your gun?

You realize to be an “active shooter” you’d need to be actively shooting right? Not just, someone attacks you, you shoot them and then stop. That’s not an active shooter

I think he knew he had already shot a couple of people in the past few minutes.

 

[Vol8188]

I would have loved to seen the rest of the comment. Brietbart conveniently cut it off after he said peaceful.
If he supports rioters (which he in no way does), then he is an idiot.
If you believe he supports rioters (which he in no way does), then you have been brainwashed.

Lol “if he supports rioters” so you agree that he may? But “if you believe he supports rioters then you have been brainwashed”

So you agree he may support rioters? By your own definition are you brainwashed? You’re welcome to find a longer clip. I’ll look too. But I highly doubt he says anything that fixes that sick comment that protests do not have to be peaceful.

Given he supports protests and doesn’t believe they have to be peaceful, how can you not conclude he supports non-peaceful protests aka riots?

 

[Vol8188]

I think he knew he had already shot a couple of people in the past few minutes.

So we agree he was no actively shooting? And actually what Gaige admits in the trial is he thought Rittenhouse said he was a cop or that he was working with the cops. Yet he still drew his gun on Rittenhouse when he was not actively shooting anyone

 

[VolStrom]

I'm not supporting riots. Never have.
What I have said is arrest and prosecute any and all of them.
I'm only giving you guys some much needed perspective.
The whole right wing bs of a summer of riots and cities burning with massive destruction is total crap.

Are you serious Clark? So the looting, fires and general destruction was made up? If you think that, you've lost your ever loving mind.

 

[InVOLuntary]

That's so asinine.
My take is Rittenhouse was stupid and his stupidity led to two deaths. (deaths of people who were also stupid)
As I said from the beginning...........stupid on stupid.

So should people be able to go pretty much anywhere they want in a free society? Did he have a right to be there?

And, his stupidity didn't lead to anyone's death. The people that chose to attack him and chase him are responsible for their own deaths. If a guy tight ropes across the grand canyon and falls to his death, is it the rope's fault, gravity's fault, the hard ground below's fault?

 

[Electric Orange]

I'm not supporting riots. Never have.
What I have said is arrest and prosecute any and all of them.
I'm only giving you guys some much needed perspective.
The whole right wing bs of a summer of riots and cities burning with massive destruction is total crap.

2020–2021 United States racial unrest - Wikipedia.
According to a September 2020 estimate, arson, vandalism and looting caused about $1–2 billion in insured damage between May 26 and June 8, making this initial phase of the George Floyd protests the civil disorder event with the highest recorded damage in United States history.

Of course this is from the pro alt right hate group, Wikipedia...

 

[Vol423]

Are you serious Clark? So the looting, fires and general destruction was made up? If you think that, you've lost your ever loving mind.

He never had one to lose.

 

[Caculator]

The 'Mamet Principle', pretending an action is something other than what is visible in their action, is the go-to defense of all leftist ideologues. That method of deflection is how Democrats attempt to become the victim from the consequences of their own violent rhetoric.

 

[0nelilreb]

lol..........
Do you agree that the right to vote does not give you the right to vote as often as you wish?
Do you agree that the right to vote does not give you the right to vote in any election you wish?

Yes I do , you are guaranteed the right to “ Vote “ , just like you are guaranteed the right to keep and bear arm(s)

 

[MemphisVol77]

So you see, there is a continuum.
The continued use of the term "cities burning" is absurd. It's intended to paint a picture far worse than the reality.
It worked on the right.
Some of you nuts think BLM were protests were basically violent riots....and that's plain ignorant.

That's so asinine.
My take is Rittenhouse was stupid and his stupidity led to two deaths. (deaths of people who were also stupid)
As I said from the beginning...........stupid on stupid.

 

[0nelilreb]

I'm not supporting riots. Never have.
What I have said is arrest and prosecute any and all of them.
I'm only giving you guys some much needed perspective.
The whole right wing bs of a summer of riots and cities burning with massive destruction is total crap.

I like perspective , but I know bullsh!t when I see and hear it ..

 

[1vol8]

I'm not supporting riots. Never have.
What I have said is arrest and prosecute any and all of them.
I'm only giving you guys some much needed perspective.
The whole right wing bs of a summer of riots and cities burning with massive destruction is total crap.

Tell that to the thousands of business owners that can no longer operate, the 11 dead and hundreds beaten. My guess is they would all disagree that its “total crap”.

 

[UT_VOLS13]

Tell that to the thousands of business owners that can no longer operate, the 11 dead and hundreds beaten. My guess is they would all disagree that its “total crap”.

He does not care!

 

[luthervol]

Lol “if he supports rioters” so you agree that he may? But “if you believe he supports rioters then you have been brainwashed”

So you agree he may support rioters? By your own definition are you brainwashed? You’re welcome to find a longer clip. I’ll look too. But I highly doubt he says anything that fixes that sick comment that protests do not have to be peaceful.

Given he supports protests and doesn’t believe they have to be peaceful, how can you not conclude he supports non-peaceful protests aka riots?

No I do not agree.
I am 100% certain he does not support rioters.

 

[luthervol]

Are you serious Clark? So the looting, fires and general destruction was made up? If you think that, you've lost your ever loving mind.

It happened, just not on some grand cataclysmic scale. The right did their best to convince you it was a far bigger issue than it really was while at the same time ignoring the coverage of the 93% peaceful protests.
That's been my point all along.

 

[luthervol]

2020–2021 United States racial unrest - Wikipedia.
According to a September 2020 estimate, arson, vandalism and looting caused about $1–2 billion in insured damage between May 26 and June 8, making this initial phase of the George Floyd protests the civil disorder event with the highest recorded damage in United States history.

Of course this is from the pro alt right hate group, Wikipedia...

I already said it was 1-2 billion. That hasn't been disputed.
Hurricane Irma was 65 billion.

 

[Vol8188]

No I do not agree.
I am 100% certain he does not support rioters.

He supports protests. He says those protests do not have to be peaceful. Non-peaceful protests are riots.

Which part of that do you disagree with?

 

[Vol8188]

I already said it was 1-2 billion. That hasn't been disputed.
Hurricane Irma was 65 billion.

The difference is one of those was preventable. “A natural disaster was more expensive” does not excuse poor behavior.

 

[luthervol]

Yes I do , you are guaranteed the right to “ Vote “ , just like you are guaranteed the right to keep and bear arm(s)

You are guaranteed one vote and only in some elections.
Not unlimited votes in any election in which you choose to vote.

 

[luthervol]

Tell that to the thousands of business owners that can no longer operate, the 11 dead and hundreds beaten. My guess is they would all disagree that its “total crap”.

It was horrible for those.
Just as a car crash is horrible for the person in the crash.

 

[luthervol]

He supports protests. He says those protests do not have to be peaceful. Non-peaceful protests are riots.

Which part of that do you disagree with?

I would like to see his whole comment, not the piece Brietbart conveniently cut in mid sentence.