Vol8188
revolUTion in the air!
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2011
- Messages
- 45,975
- Likes
- 43,347
What goes to trial and what doesn't is always going to be on a case by case basis. It seems like you're trying to build some sort of wall around your psyche in terms of saying it couldnt possibly be viewed any other way. Wisconsin law is complicated in terms of self defense and provocation.
Determining how the law applies in this case in court wasn't unreasonable. There's really no way to conclude the trial represents discrimination against white people unless you're participating in a victim mentality of your own.
Okay. Why do you believe this case should have went to trial? Is there any specific evidence you can point to that runs counter to the self defense claim?
I see you ignored the other part. Are you agreeing with me that black men are in prison at higher rates because they commit the majority of homicides and violent crimes in general?
Last edited: