Watch the video.He shot and killed a man - fired 3 shots - then ran away. A group of good samaritans ID'd him as the shooter and tried to legally detain him.
Section 75 of the Criminal Procedure Law (Enforcement Powers – Arrest) of 1996 allows anyone to detain a person who is witnessed carrying out certain suspected crimes. ... A person using these detention powers may use reasonable force if their request is not met as long as they do not cause the suspect bruising.
Rittenhouse then shot several citizens attempting to detain him legally.
He must be convicted and serve time.
Please tell us why. I mean he did not realize when battery was committed against him. He retreated until an attempt was made to disarm him. He at no point was the aggressor=self defense doesn't it?
Watch the video.Seems everyone here has a short memory. Rittenhouse shot 3 times and killed a man initially in front of a gas station. There was NOBODY threatening him with a weapon or anything. He then ran up to the dude he shot, looked at him briefly, ran away, got on his phone and said, "I just murdered someone".
"Self defense" my ass.
The guy who was shot at the gas station was chasing and threatening the kid. There's video evidence of that if you're actually interested in being informed.Seems everyone here has a short memory. Rittenhouse shot 3 times and killed a man initially in front of a gas station. There was NOBODY threatening him with a weapon or anything. He then ran up to the dude he shot, looked at him briefly, ran away, got on his phone and said, "I just murdered someone".
You're welcome to make the argument about the ensuing crowd that tried to detain him, but he shot the first dude in cold blood. PERIOD.
"Self defense" my ass.
Get your quote correct! He did not say he murdered anyone. I'd call you misquote a blatant lie, or did you even watch the video?Seems everyone here has a short memory. Rittenhouse shot 4 times and killed a man initially in front of a gas station. He then ran up to the dude he shot, looked at him briefly, ran away, got on his phone and said, "I just murdered someone".
You're welcome to make the argument about the ensuing crowd that tried to detain him, but he shot the first dude in cold blood. PERIOD.
"Self defense" my ass.
Get your quote correct! He did not say he murdered anyone. I'd call you misquote a blatant lie, or did you even watch the video?
View attachment 308399
Not really. It doesn't take a genius to watch any of the videos and understand that Rittenhouse didn't calculate/plan a targeted attack against the first guy he shot.Seems everyone here has a short memory. Rittenhouse shot 4 times and killed a man initially in front of a gas station. He then ran up to the dude he shot, looked at him briefly, ran away, got on his phone and said, "I just murdered someone".
You're welcome to make the argument about the ensuing crowd that tried to detain him, but he shot the first dude in cold blood. PERIOD.
"Self defense" my ass.
I think its funny when left wingers try to put right wingers in their position and ask what they do..not even realizing thats what makes us fundamentally different..we don't get into their stupid situations.If one of my family members was at that "protest" and tried to take the weapon from the kid, hit him in the head with a skateboard, kicked him in the head or tried to shoot him with a handgun, I'd say the Dumb MF got what he deserved.
But none of my family members are that stupid nor or they child molesters, wife beaters or have prior weapons charges so there's that.
Charges = conviction and guilt?
Not really. It doesn't take a genius to watch any of the videos and understand that Rittenhouse didn't calculate/plan a targeted attack against the first guy he shot.
This one too.That's pretty much what the Supreme Court told them way back in 2005, Castle Rock v. Gonzales.
Hmmm... A 17-year-old, breaking curfew, possessing an illegal firearm. Telling people on camera that he didn't have any "non-lethal" weapons.
And, oh by the way, the law prohibits deadly force against someone destroying property. In this case, property that wasn't even his.
OMG...... breaking curfew..... what kind of animal is this guy?Hmmm... A 17-year-old, breaking curfew, possessing an illegal firearm. Telling people on camera that he didn't have any "non-lethal" weapons.
And, oh by the way, the law prohibits deadly force against someone destroying property. In this case, property that wasn't even his.
Anyone who watches this objectively should question all the charges that have been filed outside of the weapon possession under 18.
"I just killed someone".
Charges filed by Kenosha County prosecutors accuse Kyle Rittenhouse of first-degree intentional homicide — Wisconsin's equivalent of first-degree murder.
So, yes, he murdered someone.
And he shot a child molester and a felon with a gun. Net positive?Give the kid a fair trial. The boy had his own issues with violence - solid young citizen beating up a girl...
Self Defense My Ass
Neither But I don’t wear pink now .... although I did wear some fluorescent pink during my teen years when that was popular..... Now it is just part of the trash talk between me and my brother in law about who is more manly( just in a fun way though)..... ex.... I will say something like go sit in the corner put on your pink shirt let a real man handle this.Did he claim it, or did he try and claim it?
Does a man wearing a pink tie make you feel uncomfortable? Or more to the point, would you feel uncomfortable wearing a pink tie?