Kyle Rittenhouse - The Truth in 11 Minutes

#2,351
#2,351
volinbham said:
Am I hearing correctly that the prosecutor picked up an AR15 and waived it around the courtroom with his finger on the trigger?

EDIT - found this picture. Has this man never taken a basic firearm safety course? This is a major no no.

WireAP_cce6d362539c4614ac9bfdba1eea6868_16x9_992.jpg
Click to expand...

Besides, Binger's carbine form is atrocious....those flared elbows...egads!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boca Vol, Rickyvol77, DynaLo and 1 other person
#2,357
#2,357
lawgator1 said:
No, absolutely not.
Click to expand...

I notice that all the people saying KR shouldn't have been there never say that about the people he scuffled with.

It's interesting that the prosecution's argument is that KR started this by showing up armed but if we are looking at root causes I'd argue that the armed protestors doing property damage are the root cause.

That said, it doesn't matter what set things in motion. It's about the various actions of the people once the altercation began.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MemphisVol77, Rickyvol77, NorthDallas40 and 3 others
#2,358
#2,358
volinbham said:
I notice that all the people saying KR shouldn't have been there never say that about the people he scuffled with.

It's interesting that the prosecution's argument is that KR started this by showing up armed but if we are looking at root causes I'd argue that the armed protestors doing property damage are the root cause.

That said, it doesn't matter what set things in motion. It's about the various actions of the people once the altercation began.
Click to expand...


False. The criminality is the totality of the actions of Rittenhouse. He didn't go outside to get the mail and find himself in a them or me situation. He went looking to create a them or me situation.
 
#2,359
#2,359
lawgator1 said:
False. The criminality is the totality of the actions of Rittenhouse. He didn't go outside to get the mail and find himself in a them or me situation. He went looking to create a them or me situation.
Click to expand...
Lololol
You have any proof of that?
Nope, just wishful thinking to fit your narrative
 
  • Like
Reactions: MemphisVol77, walkenvol, NorthDallas40 and 3 others
#2,360
#2,360
lawgator1 said:
False. The criminality is the totality of the actions of Rittenhouse. He didn't go outside to get the mail and find himself in a them or me situation. He went looking to create a them or me situation.
Click to expand...

You are attributing a motive to him that has not been established then using that motive to say he is the one that created a crime.

What of the motives of the people that attacked him? That's all excusable because you believe you can read his mind?

The big give away is that you've deemed him guilty despite the evidence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: walkenvol, NorthDallas40, 1vol8 and 4 others
#2,362
#2,362
lawgator1 said:
False. The criminality is the totality of the actions of Rittenhouse. He didn't go outside to get the mail and find himself in a them or me situation. He went looking to create a them or me situation.
Click to expand...

None of the people he shot went outside to get the mail and found themselves being gunned down. They purposely involved themselves in a dangerous situation AND tried to take a gun away from someone while either threatening to kill said person or physically assaulting them but yeah, they didn't involve themselves in any criminality.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MemphisVol77, walkenvol, NorthDallas40 and 4 others
#2,363
#2,363
lawgator1 said:
False. The criminality is the totality of the actions of Rittenhouse. He didn't go outside to get the mail and find himself in a them or me situation. He went looking to create a them or me situation.
Click to expand...
You... have... got... to... be... trolling... with... this... reply.
 
  • Like
Reactions: C-south
#2,364
#2,364
lawgator1 said:
No, absolutely not.
Click to expand...
So what do you suppose we do? Just let them keep destroying whatever they wish or match their intensity against them? That’s really the only two choices and you gotta pick one because cops are either understaffed, outnumbered or defunded. Let’s hear your solution.
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood
#2,365
#2,365
1vol8 said:
So what do you suppose we do? Just let them keep destroying whatever they wish or match their intensity against them? That’s really the only two choices and you gotta pick one because cops are either understaffed, outnumbered or defunded. Let’s hear your solution.
Click to expand...

Anyone paying attention has already moved to the suburbs and country. Let Darwin’s law run it’s course until all the business, people, and economy move out.
 
#2,366
#2,366
lawgator1 said:
False. The criminality is the totality of the actions of Rittenhouse. He didn't go outside to get the mail and find himself in a them or me situation. He went looking to create a them or me situation.
Click to expand...

Except there was no criminality. He’s free to go wherever the hell he wants and legally posses a firearm while he does it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Madscientistvol, DynaLo, Rickyvol77 and 2 others
#2,367
#2,367
lawgator1 said:
False. The criminality is the totality of the actions of Rittenhouse. He didn't go outside to get the mail and find himself in a them or me situation. He went looking to create a them or me situation.
Click to expand...
It’s called the “totality of circumstances” and the circumstances were hundreds of BLM protesters destroying another city and he showed up with a medi-pack and AR-15. If you wanted to help in that situation, would YOU show up unarmed? Hell no. So don’t play like the AR-15 was only brought to start chit. You can’t say that about someone armed that still tried to retreat. I think his actions that night were of someone that didn’t “want” to hurt anyone. I think the evidence shows he only wanted to help. And that he did.
 
#2,370
#2,370
WestTennesseeVol said:
Anyone paying attention has already moved to the suburbs and country. Let Darwin’s law run it’s course until all the business, people, and economy move out.
Click to expand...
Too many innocent lives lost that way. Too many innocent people losing their livelihood in the process. Too much money in damages. Someone needs to oppose BLM. Otherwise they will continue to run rampant. They want lawlessness? I say we give it to them. Only they won’t like what true lawlessness looks like and neither will we.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NCFisher
#2,371
#2,371
1vol8 said:
Too many innocent lives lost that way. Too many innocent people losing their livelihood in the process. Too much money in damages. Someone needs to oppose BLM. Otherwise they will continue to run rampant. They want lawlessness? I say we give it to them. Only they won’t like what true lawlessness looks like and neither will we.
Click to expand...

Fair enough.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1vol8
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top