gladiator06
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2014
- Messages
- 182
- Likes
- 196
So far, I don't see the Lady Vols being anywhere close to being a Final Four team. However, the season is young.
We will find out exactly how good the freshmen are, and exactly how good the Lady Vols are as a team, after the TEXAS game on December 10th.
Texas still hasnt reached a Final Four under Aston. I dont see them as some benchmark and dont consider them to be an elite team. They recruit well, but she hasnt won any Big XII regular season or tournament titles in her previous 5 seasons.
While that may be true, they are still the first team that has players of the caliber of Tennessee.
I didn't see their games over Thanksgiving, but I have a hard time getting excited about beating a Marquette team that was considered a cupcake by Tennessee fans when they played in UConn's conference. Texas will be a good measuring stick for how they rate with actually talented teams.
I consider Marquette talented lol
Marquette is ranked #20. So I'd call that a good team too.
Tennessee is an elite program with elite level talent. Marquette is not. Marquette is more talented than some of the other scrub mid-major teams that get pounded by top 10 teams, but Tennessee's performance against them should not be a barometer for how good or how bad this team is.
Tennessee is an elite program with elite level talent. Marquette is not. Marquette is more talented than some of the other scrub mid-major teams that get pounded by top 10 teams, but Tennessee's performance against them should not be a barometer for how good or how bad this team is.
The LVs started the season ranked 14th in the AP poll and I believe were 12th when they played Marquette.
The polls reflect that the team was down a likely AA player in Diamond and their anticipated starting PG and were relying heavily on freshmen players at the start of the season.
That was a good win, particularly under the circumstances of the OT (with Nared , Westbrook, and Davis fouling out).
Hmmm 🤔 I think its more about the willingness to not hang their head and stay in a game like unlike their predecessors who also has elite talent but lost to scrub power 5 teams.
I won't disagree with you there. But I haven't lowered my standards for the team to the extent that I'll be celebrating that they didn't fold like a cheap suit against a team with significantly less talent.
Tennessee has a stockpile of talent on their team. Their preseason ranking has more to do with the fact that their similarly talented teams the last 2 years have fallen way below expectations. They are being punished by the pollsters and forced to earn their way back into the top 10. But make no mistake...this is a team with top 10...maybe top 5 talent. They just need the results to match.
Like I said, I'm not going to pretend that Marquette is anywhere close to the stratosphere of Tennessee. Their best player was ranked #91 on Hoopgurlz, and no other player on their roster was a top 100 player on Hoopgurlz. They would have been lucky to have someone like Kamara Harris on their team, and she can't even get off the Tennessee bench.
It's a win, but Marquette was overmatched talent-wise in this game no matter what their preseason rankings were.
Tennessee has a stockpile of talent on their team. Their preseason ranking has more to do with the fact that their similarly talented teams the last 2 years have fallen way below expectations. They are being punished by the pollsters and forced to earn their way back into the top 10. But make no mistake...this is a team with top 10...maybe top 5 talent. They just need the results to match.
Like I said, I'm not going to pretend that Marquette is anywhere close to the stratosphere of Tennessee. Their best player was ranked #91 on Hoopgurlz, and no other player on their roster was a top 100 player on Hoopgurlz. They would have been lucky to have someone like Kamara Harris on their team, and she can't even get off the Tennessee bench.
It's a win, but Marquette was overmatched talent-wise in this game no matter what their preseason rankings were.
Uhhhh NO!!! Do me a favor and see the truth. it's staring you directly in your face. Here's more truth for you. The LVs will not win another national championship and will become similar to ODU and La Tech, unless the AD replaces Holly. Players will start to realize their game won't get much better under CHW, as they realized playing at ODU and LT. The boosters screamed for someone to stop the bleeding at both these programs and their were people, like yourself, who continued believing things were getting better and that the programs would turn around. After a few years, the program did turn around...it headed further South because the higher rated recruits stopped coming. So, NOOOO I will not delete my account, I'll be right here for the duration.
Yes recruiting over the last couple years has been better, but the same thing happened at the two aforementioned programs. A couple good years recruiting, and then a fall off, and then a couple more good years...and then BOOM!!! 9 of the 10 players on the roster today are 6' or taller. All four recruits coming next year are 6' or taller. Help me to understand where the LV will get lateral quickness to stop the opposing teams shorter guards???? Didn't anyone learn anything from the 2008 recruiting class (Johnson, Strickland, Manning, Brewer, Gray) - NOPE!
There's a reason Hayes has been to the charity stripe 60 times already this year (2x that of any other LV) - shorter and faster laterally. Taller guards can't stay in front of her, so they reach and we get free points, assuming we make the free throw. Conversely, our taller guards reach and the opposing team gets free points.
I would like to see the LVs win a NC as much as anyone. Hell, at this point I'd settle for a final four.I believe the talent is as good as anyone. I also believe the talent was as good or better last year.
ANYWAYS, my predictions will prove correct. Time will tell.