Latest Coronavirus - Yikes

Actually he got it from his "expert" medical team who acted naively in believing - as late as March 19 - that they could trust the information coming from China, and the WHO.
As long as Trump did nothing wrong; we all agree with him that that is the only thing that's really important.
 
Hey, while I have you how come you didn't respond yesterday when I asked you to clarify that BLM and Antifa were idiots for protesting as well
Because they're not idiots just for protesting. They become idiots when they are disruptive. These people had the stated goal of being disruptive. So how about those White Nationalist in Charlottesville being idiots for protesting? Do you ever have anything to bring other than whataboutisms.? It gets old.
 
Just pay a woman that looks like this to stand close enough for him to smell her hair and see her neck and he's done.
beautiful-hair.jpeg

Of coarse, she may be to old......:oops:
To be fair. I dont think I would do much differently.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandman 423
You're still missing the point.

Why would you expect Trump to have powers/abilities that Obama didnt have?

Obama dealt with his pandemic and didnt clean up or prep afterwards for the next shift coming in.
It's not me who is missing the point. You can discover the point by answering the two questions I asked.
Why did Obama not get it?
Why did Trump not get it?
See if you can find the common thread in the two answers.
And to answer your question, I expect Trump to have at least similar powers/abilities.
He had the ability to see the threat and request appropriate funding - which is what Obama did.
Obama was denied by a republican house, that's on them far more than on Obama.
Trump could have requested what was needed, and then it would have been on the house to respond.
As is, each time the ball was dropped..............................
 
Because they're not idiots just for protesting. They become idiots when they are disruptive. These people had the stated goal of being disruptive. So how about those White Nationalist in Charlottesville being idiots? Do you ever have anything to bring other than whataboutisms.? It gets old.
No, its not whataboutisms. It's simply pointing out the hypocrisy. White Nationalist, so you're bringing this up because you assume based on my beliefs I'm White. Isn't that in itself racist and stereotypical? By the way, the White Nationalist who terrorized this state are the sorriest, lowest form of life on the planet and I hope they never rear their ugly heads again. Antifa, same thing all they want to do it cause disruption and they to are sorry sacks of sh!t. BLM was founded on a lie and over shadows the true racial injustices that take place in America. So, thank you again for making racial assumptions and showing your true colors.
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood
It's not me who is missing the point. You can discover the point by answering the two questions I asked.
Why did Obama not get it?
Why did Trump not get it?
See if you can find the common thread in the two answers.
And to answer your question, I expect Trump to have at least similar powers/abilities.
He had the ability to see the threat and request appropriate funding - which is what Obama did.
Obama was denied by a republican house, that's on them far more than on Obama.
Trump could have requested what was needed, and then it would have been on the house to respond.
As is, each time the ball was dropped..............................
So the buck stops with the house for Obama but then the buck stops with Trump....

Sounds like you are saying Obama had no responsibility either. And that from the last "adult" in the white house
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols
It goes back to that quote of "accuse the other side of what you are guilty of".

It wasnt a failing of capitalism that did any of this. It was the socialism that corrupted the capitalism to such a manner it could be sustained. But they wont see that akd will continue to make the same mistake.
Socialism only steps in where capitalism fails (or is inadequate).
 
LA Times says Ad Revenue ‘nearly eliminated’ as it Furloughs Workers

The Los Angeles Times, claiming “advertising revenue has been nearly eliminated” because of the coronavirus, said it will furlough business-side employees and slash pay for senior executives by 5 percent to 15 percent.

sized-los-angeles-times.jpg


The furloughs are slated to start April 19 and will last up to 16 weeks, according to a memo from the newspaper’s president, Chris Argentieri. The company said it will also suspend 401(k) contributions for non-union employees.

The cuts also apply to the San Diego Union Tribune, but not the community weeklies, according to a spokesman for California Times, which also owns the LA Times.

The cuts so far do not include the 600 rank-and-file editorial types who unionized with the News Guild and hammered out its first-ever contract at the paper only last October. The Guild said in a Twitter post that it was “troubled” by the cuts on the business side and planned to meet with management soon to “urge full support for our operations during this global emergency.”

Argentieri, in a memo to employees Tuesday, wrote, “Due to the unexpected effects of COVID-19, our advertising revenue has nearly been eliminated. While we’ve made significant progress in growing our digital subscriber base and developing other sources of revenue, it is not yet enough to offset the losses. The economy is in crisis and it’s become clear that we need to make some difficult changes in order to meet this challenge.”

https://nypost.com/2020/04/15/la-ti...ue-nearly-eliminated-as-it-furloughs-workers/
 
So the buck stops with the house for Obama but then the buck stops with Trump....

Sounds like you are saying Obama had no responsibility either. And that from the last "adult" in the white house
I'm saying the buck stops where it stops.
It's pretty clear to me where it stopped in each scenario.
 
How ESPN is selling their top talent on Significant Pay Cuts

ESPN is asking its top 100 on-air personalities to take a 15-percent pay cut for the next three months — Stephen A. Smith, Scott Van Pelt and Dick Vitale are among those who have agreed, The Post has learned.

ESPN executives are selling the idea to its highest paid employees, like Smith, Van Pelt and Mike Greenberg, that taking the temporary pay cut will help others keep their paychecks during the coronavirus pandemic.

“We are asking about 100 of our commentators to join with our executives and take a temporary salary reduction,” ESPN said in a statement. “These are challenging times, and we are all in this together.”

https://nypost.com/2020/04/13/how-espn-is-selling-significant-pay-cuts-to-their-top-talent/
 
No, its not whataboutisms. It's simply pointing out the hypocrisy. White Nationalist, so you're bringing this up because you assume based on my beliefs I'm White. Isn't that in itself racist and stereotypical? By the way, the White Nationalist who terrorized this state are the sorriest, lowest form of life on the planet and I hope they never rear their ugly heads again. Antifa, same thing all they want to do it cause disruption and they to are sorry sacks of sh!t. BLM was founded on a lie and over shadows the true racial injustices that take place in America. So, thank you again for making racial assumptions and showing your true colors.
I really didn't want you to answer the question but I hope you got it out of your system.
 

VN Store



Back
Top