Latest Coronavirus - Yikes

your thinking makes me thing of this for some reason:

conflate_3.jpg
The nitrates alone in one can would kill the rona.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FLVOL_79
The post was talking about the side effects of the drug in question . As you pointed out to bolster my statement , nothing we use is without side effects it’s the degree of the damage vs the outcome of doing nothing that is in question with this drug . To me liver and kidney hits far outweigh death . 🤷‍♂️

You keep missing the point. There's no evidence that death is being avoided by using the drug, there is evidence however of organ damage.

I don't understand why this is that hard to digest.

Also, side effects do not equate to "damage", in fact many drugs are prescribed off label because the side effects have intended effects elsewhere.
 
Knocking what down? If it worked, would they spend all this time and money looking for other drugs?

The idea that it time to move past HDCL. Doctors, people trained in medicine, are using it. What is your training in?

Some success does not equal all out cure. So yes, people would still be looking for new drugs and treatments. Anymore stupid questions?
 
You keep missing the point. There's no evidence that death is being avoided by using the drug, there is evidence however of organ damage.

I don't understand why this is that hard to digest.

Also, side effects do not equate to "damage", in fact many drugs are prescribed off label because the side effects have intended effects elsewhere.

How would you go about collecting that evidence?
 
You keep missing the point. There's no evidence that death is being avoided by using the drug, there is evidence however of organ damage.

I don't understand why this is that hard to digest.

You keep missing the point , there are Hospitals currently using this drug to successfully treat patients that are actually coming off of vents and going home . The only difference in administering a studied drug that you can look up the side effects on and this one is the ability of the Drs to acknowledge the effects before prescribing it . Hit to the vitals vs death . Simple choice for me , how about you if you are faced with the choice of taking it or not ? 👈🏼
 
  • Like
Reactions: allvol123
Hoad's etymology gives 'whilst' as a derivation of 'whiles', an adverbial form of 'while'. The 't' on the end is parasitic (cf. among~amongst, amid~amidst, etc.). 'Whilst' started to be used as a conjunction, equivalent to 'while', in the 13th century.
In modern British English, 'whilst' is supposedly a more formal variant of 'while'. It is also, in my experience, particularly beloved of students who write bad essays.


Dominic Watt, Department of Linguistics & Phonetics, University of Leeds​
We won the war of independence against the British giving me the right to say the damn word however I want.
 
I know how but they chose to do the study at the VA instead of at the hospitals using it . 🤔

It's a legitimate question. I don't know how evidence that a drug prevents death could be collected.

A guy given the drug might have lived without it so no evidence. A guy dies after taking it does it prove it doesn't prevent death?
 
Well duh. Lol. I obviously understand it if you're not sick. If you're sick and not sure what it was wouldn't you get tested? If not, why. I'm just curious because I don't get it.
If you're sick and not getting tested on purpose you're a dummy.
 
It's a legitimate question. I don't know how evidence that a drug prevents death could be collected.

A guy given the drug might have lived without it so no evidence. A guy dies after taking it does it prove it doesn't prevent death?

Correct but you know through logic that you would study the hospitals using the drug to cover all data and that a VA is the wrong place to study that drug unless you are looking for specific results .
 

VN Store



Back
Top