Volsfaninva917
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2009
- Messages
- 21,217
- Likes
- 33,549
That's really a terrible graph to use to make your point.
It is unless you believe positive test = death. Bulk numbers are uselessIs it though? The EU has 446m people, the US has 328m.
Perhaps you can find a graph here that will better meet your expectations.
Is it though? The EU has 446m people, the US has 328m.
Perhaps you can find a graph here that will better meet your expectations.
View attachment 289548
Things that make you go hmmmmm
The President of Tanzania has a video talking about the fact that they sent swabs from PawPaw fruit and goats, among other things, that came back as positive for Covid-19.
Aren’t there some reports stating that positive antibody tests are being reported as positive Covid-19 tests?
From the CDC on antibody testing.
“If you test positive
Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
- A positive test result shows you might have antibodies from an infection with the virus that causes COVID-19. However, there is a chance a positive result means that you have antibodies from an infection with a virus from the same family of viruses (called coronaviruses), such as the one that causes the common cold.”
Regardless of whether you test positive or negative, the results do not confirm whether or not you are able to spread the virus that causes COVID-19. Until we know more, continue to take steps to protect yourself and others.
The U.S. failed the test.
![]()
It would appear is if one follows the other, wasn't it you who was talking about the 'big picture' the other day?
They are doing fewer tests than us. As far as a raw number. I posted about this a while back.It would appear is if one follows the other, wasn't it you who was talking about the 'big picture' the other day?
They are doing fewer tests than us. As far as a raw number. I posted about this a while back.
So if you take them doing fewer tests on more people you are going to see......lower positives! Funny how that works.
I want them to tell me exactly how many are hospitalized for covid..... I don’t care about positive cases bc I have seen the same person test positive for months with this illness and never be sick..... I also don’t want hospitalizations to be called a covid hospitalization if they are they for a heart issue and happen to test positive but show no symptoms.It would appear is if one follows the other, wasn't it you who was talking about the 'big picture' the other day?
Europe for the most part stayed locked down longer than we did. For example in the UK, they just opened stores and dentist offices a couple weeks ago:I am one who thinks the count of positives is not important. However, what I find interesting about this graph is it shows counts from March 1 to June 24. Even during the most restrictive portion of our response, the line never dipped below 20k. Since this is a 7 day rolling, it means harsh restrictions accounts for about 1500 per day better than where we are on june 24.
Is it worth it (as long as hospitals are not overwhelmed and fatalities are stable / continue to fall)?
Not sure this is true when the vast majority of new cases are younger people.
The press and fear peddlers should really be brave enough to track and report current active cases and hospitalization rates. That is the true measure of the problem. They won’t though, because then this becomes a nothing burger.
Sheer number of positive cases is a damn near worthless metric to be used for anything other than peddling fear to the masses.