volbeast33
You can count on Carlos!
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2009
- Messages
- 34,530
- Likes
- 106,091
We shouldn't lock ourselves in a bunker.
There's no credibility in using Trump as a source because he has no credibility. The survival rate is 95%. I bet even a low IQ guy like yourself can do simple percentage calculation
I got thrown out of English class for being too loud and read that story while I was in the hall. She asked me what I did with my time and I told her, she made me stand up in front of the class and give an instant report lol....she said that because I did a good job she was adding it to the reading list from then onFollow it up with Vonnegut's Harrison Bergeron.
3 million? Where did you get that low-ball number? California alone has 25 millionTrump's prediction on the number of virus cases here in the US was only off by a factor of approx. 300,000.
He predicted 11. We are over 3 million. And counting.
I certainly don't need a lesson about social media. I forgot more about real life than you could possibly know about it
Those are all good arguments. The school versus daycare point is particularly meritorious.
I am simply pointing out that some blindly imposed mandate to open schools on the theory that its blanket safe to do so is just not true.
A few reasons:
1) I value freedom and believe that each individual should be responsible for making decisions for himself or herself. This includes whether to stay at home, wear PPE, social distance, etc.
2) A few weeks into the shutdown it became evident this disease was riskiest for the elderly population and the all or none approach was overkill
3) The cure was actually worse than the disease. The economic impacts will be with us for decades, and it didn’t have to be that way.
Since we're just rounding up, today's death rate is .01%
No, the death rate from today's numbers.2,800,000 or thereabouts is the number of cases. Population say 340,000,000 So the government death rates are tied to per 100,000 of population. This makes sense to you? Not to me. The severity, intentionally, of the disease gets diminished when the number of deaths is measured against 337,000,000 people who don’t have the disease. The true death rate of the disease is 130,000 deaths resulting from the reported 2,800,000 cases, or 130,000/2,800,000. Within that context the data has to be reduced to whatever subsets you want to look at. Number of deaths of those over 70 for example divided by number of cases of those over 70 etc etc Yesterday the overall was 4.8% of those who have contracted the disease died in the U.S. And that too is inaccurate to the extent of the lag time of deaths
You are right, 2 reasons: No one would collapse the economy over a flu and younger people have much more of a chance of dying from the flu that COVID